Re: [Issue 1977] integral arithmetic operation only on int?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1977 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 1924] Allow pragma(msg) in CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|spec

[Issue 1924] Allow pragma(msg) in CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 08:52 --- I think we need separate notation for this. Generating a compiler message while compiling a function is conceptually different from generating a compiler message while evalua

[Issue 1924] Allow pragma(msg) in CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment

Re: [Issue 1977] integral arithmetic operation only on int?

Don wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1977 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Issue 1924] Allow pragma(msg) in CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 11:17 --- To date, every use of writefln I've seen has been run time. So it doesn't seem particularly ambiguous at least to me, --

[Issue 1924] Allow pragma(msg) in CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 --- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 11:13 --- >From the names pragma(msg) and pragma(writefln), it isn't clear at all that one's while compiling and one's while evaluating. Better would be to name it something like "ctfe

Re: [Issue 1977] integral arithmetic operation only on int?

"Andrei Alexandrescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Could you paste your comment into bugzilla so we have the discussion tracked there? Thanks. Has the automatic relaying of newsgroup posts to Bugzilla been discontinued, or does it only work if the email address

[Issue 1924] Allow pragma(msg) in CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 12:05 --- (In reply to comment #7) > To date, every use of writefln I've seen has been run time. So it doesn't seem > particularly ambiguous at least to me, That's because at the momen

[Issue 1924] Allow pragma(msg) in CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 --- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 12:43 --- Sorry, I was far less than clear. writefln in all cases we use it in now executes with the code path, e.g. when the code is executed rather than generated. pragma is compile

Re: [Issue 1977] integral arithmetic operation only on int?

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Stewart Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has the automatic relaying of newsgroup posts to Bugzilla been discontinued, > or does it only work if the email address it's sent from is registered? > > It was probably the right thing to do considering the excessive qu

[Issue 2474] New: Recursive lazy arguments are inlined incorrectly

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2474 Summary: Recursive lazy arguments are inlined incorrectly Product: D Version: 2.021 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: n