[Issue 2567] Option To Not Treat Warnings As Errors

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2567 --- Comment #1 from cbkbbej...@mailinator.com 2009-05-10 01:06 --- Created an attachment (id=354) -- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=354action=view) Patch against 1.043 --

std.getopt RangeError

Currently, using std.getopt will result in a RangeError if parameters are improperly omitted on the command line. Since this is a reasonable user-error, it does not seem like something to crash on during release. The problem is here: if (!isDelegateWithLessThanTwoParameters !val

[Issue 2957] pardon the junk bug

http://d-new.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2957 Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

Brad Roberts wrote: Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it to a new host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm Seattle time. The process shouldn't take all that long, but I'll estimate an hour just to give myself some

[Issue 2958] New: std.getopt RangeError on missing arg

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2958 Summary: std.getopt RangeError on missing arg Product: D Version: 2.030 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

known bugzilla issue #1

I know I need to suppress the last couple lines of bugzilla posts with the Configure and why the mail is being received parts. How that part is generated changed a lot between the old and new versions of bugzilla so it'll take me a tad more work to fix that up. This part: -- Configure

bugzilla email

A while ago the inbound mail into bugzilla from replies to this group broke. I figured out why, but the fix wasn't pleasant -- the perl code wasn't compatible with a perl upgrade (5.8 - 5.10). The migration I did tonight ought to make it possible for me to put that mechanism back together..

Re: bugzilla email

Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote in message news:mailman.33.1241944005.13405.digitalmars-d-b...@puremagic.com... A while ago the inbound mail into bugzilla from replies to this group broke. I figured out why, but the fix wasn't pleasant -- the perl code wasn't compatible with a perl

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote in message news:mailman.31.1241943078.13405.digitalmars-d-b...@puremagic.com... Brad Roberts wrote: Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it to a new host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or

samples of D2 can't be compiled

Hi, inorder to learn D, I try to compile some samples of D2.029, but failed. I found the reason was that some functions had been changed. For example, in listener.d, the std.conv.toUshort(args[1]) is not appeared in D2 any more, std.conv.to!(ushort)(string) should be used instead. I mean, if are

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 Anyone else notice this?

[Issue 2960] New: CTFE rejects static array to dynamic array casts

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2960 Summary: CTFE rejects static array to dynamic array casts Product: D Version: 1.043 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: patch, rejects-valid

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

Jarrett Billingsley wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 Anyone else notice this? It's kind of a mess on

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

Sean Kelly wrote: Jarrett Billingsley wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 Anyone else notice this? It's

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Jarrett Billingsley jarrett.billings...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is!  Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox:

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote: Sean Kelly wrote: Jarrett Billingsley wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is!  Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox:

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote: Sean Kelly wrote: Jarrett Billingsley wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote: I don't see that problem at all using windows firefox 3.0.10. I suggest flushing your cache.. make sure you've got current .css files. Later, Brad Oh, nice, that worked!

[Issue 2567] [patch] Option To Not Treat Warnings As Errors

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2567 Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||llu...@gmail.com

[Issue 2346] ICE when comparing typedef'd class

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2346 --- Comment #3 from Charles Hixson charleshi...@earthlink.net 2009-05-10 14:56:04 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=355) -- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=355) Work in progress: analogous to a single level B+Tree

[Issue 2933] Cannot return const/immutable with contracts (out/invariant) enabled

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2933 --- Comment #1 from Shin Fujishiro rsi...@gmail.com 2009-05-10 15:17:32 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=356) -- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=356) This patch should fix the problem. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 2961] New: some sets of files compiled with (-w -inline -release) cause the linker error /PAGESIZE:16 is too small

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2961 Summary: some sets of files compiled with (-w -inline -release) cause the linker error /PAGESIZE:16 is too small Product: D Version: 2.029 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

Thanks for taking care of this, Brad!

Re: bugzilla email

Brad Roberts wrote: Who found it useful and/or desirable? I think it's useful and desirable, as otherwise there'll be two separate threads about each bug.