http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3769
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code, patch
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3769
--- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-02-05 02:17:54 PST ---
Better test case, works for both D1 and D2:
---
const char[][ 89 ] ENUM_NAME = [ 1:N0 ];
void bug3769()
{
switch(`Hi`.dup) {
case ENUM_NAME[1]:
}
}
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3373
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3692
Leandro Motta Barros l...@stackedboxes.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3692
--- Comment #3 from Leandro Motta Barros l...@stackedboxes.org 2010-02-05
04:42:50 PST ---
Just one additional detail:
In the program where I noticed this problem for the first time, as suggested by
others, I worked around the bug by using a
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
--- Comment #15 from Witold Baryluk bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl 2010-02-05
05:28:30 PST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Exception handling is for error conditions, not flow control. If someone is
actually constructing exceptions for some other
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3188
--- Comment #14 from Witold Baryluk bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl 2010-02-05
05:41:54 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
That's one reason. The other reason is that it can do many things that a
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3511
Witold Baryluk bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2853
Witold Baryluk bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3771
Summary: warn or disallow method as property usage without
@property attribute
Product: D
Version: 2.040
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3771
--- Comment #1 from Witold Baryluk bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl 2010-02-05
06:23:04 PST ---
Similary with array methods without brackets:
a.find = b;
auto c = a.toUpper;
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3221
Witold Baryluk bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3692
--- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-02-05 06:23:12 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Just one additional detail:
In the program where I noticed this problem for the first time, as suggested
by
others, I worked around the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3221
--- Comment #3 from Witold Baryluk bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl 2010-02-05
06:24:01 PST ---
Similary to the bug3771
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3692
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, patch
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3155
--- Comment #3 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2010-02-05 12:04:44 PST ---
Yeah, I think gdc is also gradually approaching 2.020 where druntime was
introduced and will face the same problem.
They are currently upgrading to 2.016.
--
Configure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3666
Nick Sabalausky cbkbbej...@mailinator.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3511
--- Comment #2 from Kyle Foley k-fo...@onu.edu 2010-02-05 14:30:22 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Yes, this is interesting feature but I think it should be marked to be so,
be
some kind of attributed:
struct A {
private int x_ =
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3649
Andrey bigas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bigas...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3649
iorlas denis.tomi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2835
iorlas denis.tomi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||4yb...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3773
Summary: Incorrectly returning an enum error points turns enum
line iso error line
Product: D
Version: 0.155
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3774
Summary: should not be able to implicitly cast to private base
class
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3775
Summary: Compiler segfaults on cast(string) stdin.byLine.
Product: D
Version: 2.040
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3029
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3029
Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bra...@puremagic.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3029
--- Comment #5 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-02-05 22:09:00 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Why keep the backwards compatibility in D2?
Yes. With things like the recent change to ModuleInfo, you can't even update
the compiler one
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3769
Kosmonaut kosmon...@tempinbox.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
28 matches
Mail list logo
