[Issue 5580] [64-bit] String switch statements broken in 64-bit mode
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5580 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #7 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-02-16 00:54:02 PST --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/f1c158eac6f9d1a28314c7e473c89be8b8a4f774 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/b3bb64d6ff00beddfc45c228941feedeb2e27842 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5593] Add dladdr to druntime for linux/FreeBSD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5593 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuc...@ubuntu.com --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2011-02-16 05:18:22 PST --- It's not a Posix standard as far as I'm aware, but it was first defined in SunOS, and all others followed suit. http://www.unix.com/man-page/OpenSolaris/3c/dladdr/ http://www.unix.com/man-page/Linux/3/dladdr/ http://www.unix.com/man-page/FreeBSD/3/dladdr/ http://www.unix.com/man-page/OSX/3/dladdr/ Regards -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5451] Three ideas for RedBlackTree
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5451 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com --- Comment #2 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-02-16 06:20:45 PST --- *** Issue 5586 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5594] New: MODEL doesn't work the same way for DMD, Phobos and Druntime
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5594 Summary: MODEL doesn't work the same way for DMD, Phobos and Druntime Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: dsim...@yahoo.com --- Comment #0 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-02-16 06:57:23 PST --- To build DMD as a 64-bit binary: make -flinux.mak MODEL=-m64 To build Phobos or Druntime as 64-bit: make -fposix.mak MODEL=64 These are not consistent and should be. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5596] New: SortedRange regression
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5596
Summary: SortedRange regression
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: dsim...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #0 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-02-16 07:46:16 PST ---
The following code works on 2.051 but not 2.052 beta:
import std.range, std.algorithm, std.functional;
alias SortedRange!(string[], a b) Set;
Set readTfList(string setFile) {
string[] raw;
return pipe!(sort, uniq, array, assumeSorted)(raw);
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5596] SortedRange regression
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5596 --- Comment #1 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-02-16 07:46:57 PST --- Forgot to paste in the error message. Here it is: d:\dmd2\windows\bin\..\..\src\phobos\std\range.d(5415): Error: this for _input needs to be type SortedRange not type SortedRange!(string[],a b) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5595] Compiler crash on heavy std.algorithm use
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5595 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #1 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-02-16 07:58:26 PST --- Confirmed. I'm on it. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5597] New: [64-bit] Illegal Instruction on Ancient Hardware
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5597
Summary: [64-bit] Illegal Instruction on Ancient Hardware
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: dsim...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #0 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-02-16 08:17:59 PST ---
The following code works on newer hardware, but terminates with Illegal
instruction on some ancient CPUs (details below):
import std.conv;
void main() {
string foo = 1.0;
parse!float(foo);
}
The ancient hardware in question (first CPU from cat /proc/cpuinfo):
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 4
model name :Intel(R) Xeon(TM) MP CPU 3.66GHz
stepping: 1
cpu MHz : 3657.816
cache size : 1024 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov
pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor
ds_cpl est tm2 cid cx16 xtpr
bogomips: 7321.85
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 128
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5401] std.socket updates and boost license
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5401 Masahiro Nakagawa repeate...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||repeate...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Masahiro Nakagawa repeate...@gmail.com 2011-02-16 08:27:57 PST --- http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/phobos/2010-July/001171.html I suggested std.socket replacement in Phobos ML. This improvement that creates Asio based new socket is still continuing with a view to event, but I don't have enough time ;( -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5595] Compiler crash on heavy std.algorithm use
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5595
--- Comment #2 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-02-16 08:28:43 PST ---
The regression was caused by a Phobos change, which has triggered a compiler
segfault in interpret.c.
In attempting to instantiate map!(to), 'to' is a symbol with no identifier.
(.ident is NULL).
The segfault can be prevented in dsymbol.c, line 70, by checking for a null
identifier. But without knowing why we're getting a null identifier, I can't
recommend this as a valid patch.
int Dsymbol::equals(Object *o)
{ Dsymbol *s;
if (this == o)
return TRUE;
s = (Dsymbol *)(o);
-if (s ident-equals(s-ident))
+if (s s-ident ident-equals(s-ident))
return TRUE;
return FALSE;
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5594] MODEL doesn't work the same way for DMD, Phobos and Druntime
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5594 Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bra...@puremagic.com --- Comment #1 from Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com 2011-02-16 10:10:48 PST --- Worth noting, you don't need to build dmd as a 64 bit binary to have it generate 64 bit output. I do agree that consistency would be good. While fixing inconsistencies, there's a similar one for building phobos between the posix and win32 make files. posix.mak uses DRUNTIME_PATH and win32.mak uses DRUNTIME. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5597] [64-bit] Illegal Instruction on Ancient Hardware
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5597 --- Comment #1 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-02-16 10:59:07 PST --- BTW, I think this is related to the lahf instruction because it's apparently been a big problem in the past with old 64-bit CPUs not supporting it. Here's the cpuinfo for the oldest hardware this code does work on. The only difference in flags looks to be lahf. processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7330 @ 2.40GHz stepping: 11 cpu MHz : 2394.055 cache size : 3072 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 4 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority bogomips: 4788.11 clflush size: 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5597] [64-bit] Illegal Instruction on Ancient Hardware
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5597 --- Comment #2 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-02-16 11:00:45 PST --- Argh there really needs to be a way to edit these posts. I accidentally got the wrong box. The correct info for the oldest CPU it does work on is: processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7330 @ 2.40GHz stepping: 11 cpu MHz : 2393.892 cache size : 3072 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 4 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 4791.31 clflush size: 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5595] Compiler crash on heavy std.algorithm use
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5595
--- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-02-16 11:51:32 PST ---
Slightly reduced test case:
-
import std.algorithm;
import std.datetime;
import std.math;
void foo(A)(A x) {}
void readExp() {
int xxx;
double[] yyy;
map!(abs)(yyy);
map!(foo)(xxx);
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5591] EBX register not preserved when calling stdcall function pointer
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5591
hypothermia.fr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |critical
--- Comment #2 from hypothermia.fr...@gmail.com 2011-02-16 12:10:39 PST ---
After disassembly I found out that this code was generated(no -O switch):
//asm { mov EBX,3; } bar(4);
mov ebx, 3
push4
mov ebx, large fs:2Ch
mov esi, [ebx]
calldword ptr [esi+4F4h]
mov [ebp+var_20], ebx
//the next round ecx is used...
//asm { mov EBX,5; } bar(6);
mov ebx, 5
push6
mov ecx, large fs:2Ch
mov edx, [ecx]
calldword ptr [edx+4F4h]
mov [ebp+var_20], ebx
Why is DMD not preserving the EBX register in the first call? The worst thing
is that the compiler doesn't even know tha there's something in EBX... This
problem happened to me with when EBX had a this pointer and then DMD didn't
save it and after the function pointer call I got an exception!
I think this is a serious issue and should be looked at ASAP.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5591] EBX register not preserved when calling stdcall function pointer
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5591 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au --- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-02-16 12:22:07 PST --- Top priority for this one. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5597] [64-bit] Illegal Instruction on Ancient Hardware
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5597 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-02-16 13:09:53 PST --- When running it under gdb, can you verify that it actually does fail on the LAHF instruction? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5595] Compiler crash on heavy std.algorithm use
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5595
--- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-02-16 13:12:13 PST ---
Reduced test case shows it involves overload sets of templates. Segfaults as
far back as 2.012. Definitely not a regression.
test1.d ===
void bar(D)(D x) {}
test2.d ===
void bar(N)(N x) {}
test0.d ===
import test1, test2;
template map(fun...)
{
void map(R)(R r) {}
}
void foo(A)(A x) {}
void baz() {
int xxx;
char yyy;
map!(bar)(yyy);
map!(foo)(xxx);
}
---
dmd test0
segfault
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5598] New: rdmd does not fail on invalid filename
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5598 Summary: rdmd does not fail on invalid filename Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2011-02-16 13:21:13 PST --- rdmd thisFileDoesNotExist Produces thisFileDoesNotExist.d.deps, and no error messages. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5599] New: Rdmd: Switches after the filename have no effect
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5599
Summary: Rdmd: Switches after the filename have no effect
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2011-02-16
13:22:31 PST ---
module test;
void main() { }
unittest {
assert(0);
}
rdmd test.d -unittest
Expected behavior is:
rdmd -unittest test.d
core.exception.AssertError@test(5): unittest failure
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5597] [64-bit] Illegal Instruction on Ancient Hardware
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5597 --- Comment #4 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-02-16 13:25:06 PST --- Neither dmd nor the runtime uses LAHF, but they do use SAHF which I think is the same issue. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5595] Compiler crash on heavy std.algorithm use
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5595
--- Comment #5 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-02-16 14:23:24 PST ---
Another reduction, uses test1.d and test2.d from the previous comment. It's
clear that IFTI is not required. The issue is instantiating a tuple with an
overload set. If you change the baz(F...) to baz(F) you get:
test0.d(7): Error: template instance baz!(__anonymous) does not match template
declaration baz(F)
which shows that the overload set really doesn't have an identifier.
Also, you can replace the (F...) with (alias F), and still get the segfault. So
it is not a problem with tuples; it's a problem with overload sets of
templates.
=
import test1, test2;
void foo(A)() {}
template baz(F...)
{
enum int baz = 1;
}
static assert(baz!bar == baz!foo);
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5526] Static templated functions don't work with CTFE
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5526 Vladimir thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Vladimir thecybersha...@gmail.com 2011-02-16 15:40:22 PST --- Oops, I stumbled upon the exact same bug a while ago. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 3959 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3959] can't mixin result of templated static struct method
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3959 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir thecybersha...@gmail.com 2011-02-16 15:40:23 PST --- *** Issue 5526 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5601] New: A template forward reference error
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5601
Summary: A template forward reference error
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-02-16 16:20:11 PST ---
A case of forward template forward reference (I am not sure this is actually a
bug):
import std.traits;
auto foo() {
alias ReturnType!foo T;
return 0;
}
void main() {}
DMD 2.052 shows (it's not a regression):
...\dmd\src\phobos\std\traits.d(122): Error: template instance forward
reference of foo
...\dmd\src\phobos\std\traits.d(105): Error: forward reference to foo
...\dmd\src\phobos\std\traits.d(122): Error: template instance
std.traits.staticLength!(foo) error instantiating
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5602] New: BigInts ignore leading spaces as in %5d
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5602
Summary: BigInts ignore leading spaces as in %5d
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-02-16 16:21:58 PST ---
import std.stdio, std.bigint;
void main() {
writefln(%10d, BigInt(10));
writefln(%10d, 10);
}
It prints:
10
10
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5603] New: Initialization syntax for dynamic arrays
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5603
Summary: Initialization syntax for dynamic arrays
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-02-16 16:23:03 PST ---
Fixed-sized arrays allow to specify an initialization value, or to not specify
one, or to leave the stack memory untouched, for special situations where
performance matters a lot:
// program #1
void main() {
int[5] a2 = void;
int[5] a1 = 1;
int[5][5] m2 = void;
int[5][5] m1 = 1;
}
Dynamic arrays don't allow to specify an initialization value (expecially after
the deprecation of 'typedef', that used to allow the definition of a new int
type with a different init value). DMD has no syntax to allocate an unitialized
array, and currently it is not able to avoid double initializations of dynamic
arrays, an example:
// program #2
void main() {
auto a1 = new int[5];
a1[] = 1;
}
Asm of program #2 (optimized built). __d_newarrayT performs a first
initialization to zero, __memset32 performs a second initialization:
__Dmain comdat
L0: sub ESP,01Ch
mov EAX,offset FLAT:_D11TypeInfo_Ai6__initZ
push 5
push EAX
call near ptr __d_newarrayT
mov 0Ch[ESP],EAX
mov 010h[ESP],EDX
push dword ptr 0Ch[ESP]
push 1
push EDX
call near ptr __memset32
add ESP,014h
add ESP,01Ch
xor EAX,EAX
ret
So to translate the program #1 for dynamic arrays you need something like this
(I am not sure this is fully correct. GC.disable are used because m1/m2 contain
uninitialized pointers):
// program #3
import core.memory: GC;
void main() {
uint ba1 = GC.BlkAttr.NO_SCAN | GC.BlkAttr.APPENDABLE;
int n1 = 5;
int[] a1 = (cast(int*)GC.malloc(int.sizeof * n1, ba1))[0 .. n1];
uint ba2 = GC.BlkAttr.NO_SCAN | GC.BlkAttr.APPENDABLE;
int n2 = 5;
int[] a2 = (cast(int*)GC.malloc(int.sizeof * n2, ba2))[0 .. n2];
a2[] = 1;
uint ba3a = GC.BlkAttr.APPENDABLE;
uint ba3b = GC.BlkAttr.NO_SCAN | GC.BlkAttr.APPENDABLE;
int n3 = 5;
GC.disable();
int[][] m1 = (cast(int[]*)GC.malloc((int[]).sizeof * n3, ba3a))[0 .. n3];
foreach (ref row; m1)
row = (cast(int*)GC.malloc(int.sizeof * n3, ba3b))[0 .. n3];
GC.enable();
uint ba4a = GC.BlkAttr.APPENDABLE;
uint ba4b = GC.BlkAttr.NO_SCAN | GC.BlkAttr.APPENDABLE;
int n4 = 5;
GC.disable();
int[][] m2 = (cast(int[]*)GC.malloc((int[]).sizeof * n4, ba4a))[0 .. n4];
foreach (ref row; m2) {
row = (cast(int*)GC.malloc(int.sizeof * n4, ba4b))[0 .. n4];
row[] = 1;
}
GC.enable();
}
So to avoid all that bug-prone mess I suggest to allow the fixed-sized array
syntax for dynamic arrays too:
// program #4
void main() {
auto a2 = new int[5] = void;
auto a1 = new int[5] = 1;
auto m2 = new int[][](5, 5) = void;
auto m1 = new int[][](5, 5) = 1;
}
An usage of unitialized memory:
http://research.swtch.com/2008/03/using-uninitialized-memory-for-fun-and.html
An Efficient Representation for Sparse Sets (1993), by Preston Briggs, Linda
Torczon:
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.30.7319
From programming pearls book:
http://books.google.it/books?id=kse_7qbWbjsCpg=PA207lpg=PA207dq=programming+pearls+uninitializedsource=blots=DfAXDLwT5zsig=X53xYgD0wdn_Rwl7tFNeCiRt4Nohl=enei=HWVcTa35EYOdOsLI5OYLsa=Xoi=book_resultct=resultresnum=1ved=0CBUQ6AEwAA
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5600] rdmd: Broken behavior with command-line input
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5600 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||and...@metalanguage.com AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|and...@metalanguage.com -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5598] rdmd does not fail on invalid filename
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5598 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||and...@metalanguage.com AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|and...@metalanguage.com -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5599] Rdmd: Switches after the filename have no effect
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5599 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||and...@metalanguage.com Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #1 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2011-02-16 19:32:34 PST --- This is as expected. Everything after the actual module name is passed to the module itself. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5596] SortedRange regression
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5596
--- Comment #2 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-02-16 19:33:35 PST ---
Here's a better-reduced test case. Also see the comments in the test case for
some insight into what's going on here.
import std.range;
// This alias is necessary but not sufficient to reproduce the bug. Even
// changing the white space in the comparison function, i.e. a b - ab,
// prevents this bug from being reproduced. Must have to do with multiple
// attempts to instantiate SortedRange with the same parameters.
alias SortedRange!(string[], a b) Set;
void main() {
string[] raw;
auto foo = assumeSorted(raw);
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5599] Rdmd: Switches after the filename have no effect
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5599 --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2011-02-16 19:35:25 PST --- My bad! -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5596] SortedRange regression
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5596 --- Comment #3 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-02-16 19:48:48 PST --- Also note that changing the comparison function in the assumeSorted line makes this bug go away, too. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5595] Compiler crash on heavy std.algorithm use
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5595
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-02-16 23:40:07 PST ---
I think my initial patch was basically correct. Overload sets are not equal to
other Objects.
int Dsymbol::equals(Object *o)
{ Dsymbol *s;
if (this == o)
return TRUE;
s = (Dsymbol *)(o);
-if (s ident-equals(s-ident))
+// Overload sets don't have an ident
+if (s ident s-ident ident-equals(s-ident))
return TRUE;
return FALSE;
}
The interesting thing, which I hadn't realized before, is that a template alias
parameter can be an overload set.
The question this raises is, are there other places in the code where it's
assumed that every DSymbol has an ident?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 5451] Three ideas for RedBlackTree
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5451 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2011-02-16 23:54:25 PST --- The default constructor problem should be easily solvable once RedBlackTree becomes a class, as it appears that it soon will, since Andrei has decided to make the containers in std.container classes instead of structs. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
