http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
--- Comment #37 from Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de 2011-03-23
00:56:13 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #36)
What's the status of Windows stack trace integration?
Note that Benjamin's code needs to be updated by adding an opApply
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5765
--- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-03-23 03:42:32 PDT ---
OK, although I don't think that the case with Ackermann code is so bad. It's
basically giving you a compile-time warning that the function blows up very,
very easily.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5769
Summary: struct elaborate constructor should make rvalue
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5769
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-03-23 05:47:01 PDT ---
Fixing thi bug is difficult for me.
DMD internally behavior is...
1.Elaborate constructor returns this reference internally.
- see CtorDeclaration::semantic()
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5765
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-03-23 05:55:03 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The thing I'm really worried about is this:
BigInt a, b, c;
a = (a ^^ b) % c;
This is an attempt to do modular exponentiation, which comes up
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5770
Summary: Template constructor bypass access check
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5765
--- Comment #5 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-03-23 06:57:19 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
The thing I'm really worried about is this:
BigInt a, b, c;
a = (a ^^ b) % c;
This is an attempt to do
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5771
Summary: Template constructor auto ref and do not work
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5765
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-03-23 10:55:03 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
That's a false consistency. T ^^ int is the common operation, not T ^^ T.
Really. BigInt ^^ BigInt isn't a BigInt. It's too big to be
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5772
Summary: Tuple containing typedefed value causes error in
format.d
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5773
--- Comment #1 from Magnus Lie Hetland mag...@hetland.org 2011-03-23 13:17:29
PDT ---
Perhaps this is just me being stupid -- trying to sort things that can't be
compared? However, if I use a custom struct (instead of a tuple) I get an
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5765
--- Comment #7 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-03-23 13:35:05 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
That's a false consistency. T ^^ int is the common operation, not T ^^ T.
Really. BigInt ^^ BigInt isn't a
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5774
Summary: [64 bit] relocation truncated to fit with __gshared
array, while(), and $
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5775
Summary: body keyword is unnecessary
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5773
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5776
Summary: DMD assert. failure on topN with custom
comparison/data in inner function
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5775
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5775
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5773
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kenn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5773
--- Comment #4 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-03-23 16:13:23 PDT ---
The overlapping array copy exception should be the same as issue 5705.
Not sure about the segfault, as I can't reproduce a segfault (only the same
overlapping array copy
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5765
--- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-03-23 16:40:37 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
They are not system languages. The comparison is irrelevant.
Well, Lisp was used plenty as a system language. D wants to be a multi-purpose
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4500
--- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-03-23 18:02:28 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=933)
Fixed scoped
I tried to fix this issue.
It succeeded, but resulting code includes ugly hack.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4500
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k.hara...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5777
Summary: Move semantics require full spec NRVO
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5778
Summary: Missing attributes.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: websites
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5779
Summary: Bad value range propagation for ternary operator
Product: D
Version: D1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5779
Vladimir thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5779
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5780
Summary: handles[patch] std.traits.hasIndirections incorrectly
handels static arrays
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
29 matches
Mail list logo
