Re: opDispatch returning this not working in a hierarchy

On 2/1/2012 8:00 PM, Daniel L. Alves wrote: I don't know if this is really a bug or some gotcha of the language that I don't get. I'm sorry if it happens to be the later. This n.g. is mainly for bugzilla notifications. Questions like this should go into the digitalmars.D.learn n.g. But to a

Re: opDispatch returning this not working in a hierarchy

There are some issues with mixing opDispatch and property syntax. Try: base.items().printValue( true ); This list is not for posting bug reports, it's just for bugzilla issues. Please post this kind of thing to d.learn or open a bug report at http://d.puremagic.com/issues/ "Daniel L. Alves" w

[Issue 4397] const/CTFE does not work

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4397 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 4881] _d_arrayliteralT() called in instances where a blit should suffice

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4881 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 2526] (D1 only) non-const initializer to constant accepted inside template

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2526 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nfx...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from yebbli

[Issue 2356] array literal as non static initializer generates horribly inefficient code.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2356 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@invisibleduck.org --- Comment #8 from

[Issue 5367] Array of closures assign problem

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5367 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 3389] gdb: using -gc is mandatory but not well documented

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3389 Brad Roberts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 4932] Add opUnary("&") address-of support

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4932 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com --- Comm

[Issue 4149] refs displayed as pointers in gdb

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4149 --- Comment #15 from Brad Roberts 2012-02-01 21:03:43 PST --- Please stop cluttering this bug report with discussion about the meaning of -g, that's a solved problem. This report is about preserving 'ref'ness through the backend and dwarf deb

[Issue 4044] [Tracker] Bad debug information and DWARF errors

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4044 Brad Roberts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 4044] [Tracker] Bad debug information and DWARF errors

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4044 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #

[Issue 7416] 2.058 regression: fails to instantiate a constrained function template with a nested function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7416 --- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-01 21:20:39 PST --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/960f6fd4404750ab2d637f66d63ff70c98f5b73c

[Issue 7416] 2.058 regression: fails to instantiate a constrained function template with a nested function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7416 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 5448] Array of AAs literal doesn't work

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5448 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull CC|

[Issue 7419] [2.058/CTFE] Constructor of struct is overwritten inside a unittest with -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7419 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #

[Issue 5498] wrong common type deduction for array of classes

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5498 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, rejects-valid CC|

[Issue 7419] [2.058/CTFE] Constructor of struct is overwritten inside a unittest with -inline

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7419 --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright 2012-02-01 22:00:23 PST --- Looking at that git commit, if I add back in the following code that was elided: 3450a3451,3459 > > #if 1 > if (op==TOKconstruct && this->e1->op==TOKvar && this->e2->op != TOKthis

[Issue 5567] arrays can't call aliased functions as member functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5567 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 4525] Regression(2.020) Array member call syntax can't find matches in current class

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4525 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com --- Comment #8 from yeb

[Issue 3742] Please add support for 'Lightweight Profiling' which adds a set of user-controlled counters to the AMD64 architecture

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3742 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 660] Incorrect protection error message

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=660 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #2 from Don 2012-02-01 22:32:25

[Issue 7423] New: Regression (2.057): Hex Literals are no longer treated as unsigned.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7423 Summary: Regression (2.057): Hex Literals are no longer treated as unsigned. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: re

[Issue 7423] Regression (2.057): Hex Literals are no longer treated as unsigned.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7423 Adam Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P1 CC|

[Issue 7423] Regression (2.057): Hex Literals are no longer treated as unsigned.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7423 Brad Roberts changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bra...@puremagic.com --- Comment #1 fro

[Issue 7423] Regression (2.057): Hex Literals are no longer treated as unsigned.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7423 --- Comment #2 from Adam Wilson 2012-02-01 22:59:38 PST --- This is the cmdline used: dmd -c -d -o- -Isrc -Iimport -Hfimport\core\bitop.di src\core\bitop.d It's lifted straight out of the Druntime win32.mak file. Although I think the old DI ge

[Issue 7423] Regression (2.057): Hex Literals are no longer treated as unsigned.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7423 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com Seve

[Issue 7423] Regression (2.057): Hex Literals are no longer treated as unsigned.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7423 --- Comment #4 from Adam Wilson 2012-02-01 23:17:09 PST --- Well, as long as it gets fixed I suppose categorization doesn't matter. My DI generation patch is sunk until this is fixed, and given that dynamic libraries work now, it'll be more imp

[Issue 7423] Regression (2.057): Hex Literals are no longer treated as unsigned.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7423 --- Comment #5 from Brad Roberts 2012-02-01 23:21:05 PST --- >From what you've said so far, you have local changes and those changes broke something? Sounds like you've got some debugging to do. At a minimum, you'll need to show what you cha

<    1   2