http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4269
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|regression |normal
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4269
--- Comment #15 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-02-07 01:05:27 PST ---
So far my patch fixes the original bug report, and about 60% of Daniel's extra
test cases.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5915
--- Comment #5 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-02-07
02:04:31 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Where are you pasting the snippets of code? I'm using Opera (Win 7) and the
text from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4854
--- Comment #15 from Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com 2012-02-07 04:21:38 PST ---
I (In reply to comment #14)
Is anyone still running 10.5? That's two OSX versions ago.
I don't know. But I see now reason why we shouldn't support 10.5 as long as it
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7456
Summary: Purity strength not documented
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: websites
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7456
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7457
Summary: nested pure functions not specified
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7458
Summary: documentation claims non-existent limitation of nested
aggregate member functions
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7459
Summary: working around nested function declaration order
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: spec
Severity: enhancement
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7452
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Function using enforce()|Function using enforce()
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5076
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7452
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #2 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6332
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |pull
--- Comment #2 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5939
d...@dawgfoto.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@dawgfoto.de
--- Comment #10
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5939
--- Comment #11 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-02-07
15:31:45 PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
int base = 2;
map!(a = a + base)(new int[](10));
What we should do to solve this is to infer if a templated struct
==
Bug:
--
1) Console output buffer is not flushed when it should be.
==
Example Code:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7394
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Please report bugs to d.puremagic.com/issues. This list is not supposed to be
posted to directly by users. You sign up for it if you want to see all of the
updates to bugs on Bugzilla.
- Jonathan M Davis
On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 15:49:19 Kevin Brogan wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5939
--- Comment #12 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2012-02-07 19:06:25 PST ---
Ah, I didn't wanted to confuse here.
My example was a case for why Result could not be a static struct.
As such it shouldn't be default constructible.
David's example OTOH is a
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1448
Kevin ke...@brogan.ca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@brogan.ca
--- Comment #7
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7451
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
21 matches
Mail list logo
