[Issue 8367] New: std.range.chain's template constraint is inadequate

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8367 Summary: std.range.chain's template constraint is inadequate Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

[Issue 8368] New: std.algorithm.sort's template constraint is inadequate

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8368 Summary: std.algorithm.sort's template constraint is inadequate Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 8276] [CTFE] ICE when reading variable from nested function

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8276 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #81 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-07-10 05:05:48 PDT --- (In reply to comment #80) (In reply to comment #79) - we have variadics that are really just C's variadics with typeinfo added We also have C's variadics.

[Issue 7247] All programs segfault before main

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7247 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 7258] std.array.array of const items

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7258 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |normal --- Comment #3

[Issue 7366] IFTI fails to consider bounds-checked implicit conversions for non-deduced parameter types

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7366 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4953] Regression(2.031): templates don't do implicit conversion properly

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4953 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch ---

[Issue 8366] Overriding const member function in conjunction with mutable overload causes a strange error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8366 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #3

[Issue 6744] Missing AA symbol with enum

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6744 Shahid govell...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||govell...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 8369] New: try/finally block and float division by zero

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8369 Summary: try/finally block and float division by zero Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 8370] New: invalid deprecation error with -release -inline -noboundscheck

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8370 Summary: invalid deprecation error with -release -inline -noboundscheck Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords:

[Issue 8364] Allow exclamation mark in template definition

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8364 --- Comment #4 from David Piepgrass qwertie...@gmail.com 2012-07-10 12:31:37 PDT --- Why? Because one syntax is easier to learn than two. Timon said when I wrote my very first function template in D, I used the proposed syntax and was

[Issue 8371] New: Add a function to make a range from a sequence of elements

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8371 Summary: Add a function to make a range from a sequence of elements Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 8372] New: -property is broken

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8372 Summary: -property is broken Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 8371] Add a function to make a range from a sequence of elements

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8371 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch --- Comment #1

[Issue 4183] @property doesnt work with delegate return type

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4183 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch

[Issue 8372] -property is broken

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8372 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8222] Optlink crashes when debug info is enabled

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8222 --- Comment #1 from Rene Zwanenburg renezwanenb...@gmail.com 2012-07-10 13:23:38 PDT --- Today I finally managed to work around the issue. The offending line was: auto list = _messageListeners.get(listener.type, new MessageListener[0]); But

[Issue 8372] -property is broken

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8372 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 8372] -property is broken

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8372 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-10 13:26:47 PDT --- How so? Your first example is the same as bug# 4183, the second one is an example of bug# 8162, and your third example is invalid. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 8372] -property is broken

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8372 --- Comment #4 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-07-10 13:33:51 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) How so? Your first example is the same as bug# 4183, bug# 4183 does not mention the -property flag. the second one is an example of bug# 8162, bug#

[Issue 8373] New: IFTI fails on overloading of function vs non function template

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8373 Summary: IFTI fails on overloading of function vs non function template Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 8371] Add a function to make a range from a sequence of elements

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8371 Christophe Travert christophe.trav...@normalesup.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8373] IFTI fails on overloading of function vs non function template

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8373 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8372] -property is broken

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8372 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-10 13:46:37 PDT --- bug# 4183 does not mention the -property flag. On re-reading, I see that you're right on that, but it's really the same bug. bug# 8162 does not mention

[Issue 8372] -property is broken

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8372 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 8162] [TDPL] -property fails to give an error when a property function is called with parens

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8162 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch --- Comment #6

[Issue 8373] IFTI fails on overloading of function vs non function template

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8373 --- Comment #2 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-07-10 13:55:43 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) This looks very similar to bug# 8316, but I'm not sure if it's the same thing. Thank you for looking that up, but it is a different issue. The

[Issue 8316] Regression with template functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8316 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-10 14:10:53 PDT --- See also bug# 8373 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 8374] New: One missed array literal interpretation as int[2]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8374 Summary: One missed array literal interpretation as int[2] Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity:

[Issue 8375] New: std.path.sep is deprecated

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8375 Summary: std.path.sep is deprecated Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857 --- Comment #83 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-07-10 15:47:32 PDT --- (In reply to comment #82) (In reply to comment #81) But no use case I can see for using a C-style variadic for a D class method. I dunno, maybe you want to pass

[Issue 8374] One missed array literal interpretation as int[2]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8374 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8374] One missed array literal interpretation as int[2]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8374 timon.g...@gmx.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Issue 8374] One missed array literal interpretation as int[2]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8374 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-07-10 17:49:56 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) The type of [1,2] is int[], not int[2]. Usually in my bug reports I add some cases where the code works, to avoid troubles like this one.

[Issue 7174] Cannot use property function call as static if condition

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7174 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8376] New: 64 bit codegen bug involving dynamically indexed static array and continue statement

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8376 Summary: 64 bit codegen bug involving dynamically indexed static array and continue statement Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: