[Issue 911] expression.c:4257: virtual Expression* DotIdExp::semantic(Scope*): Assertion `0' failed.

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=911 --- Comment #7 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-05-04 05:29 --- This all works for me on both DMD1.042 and 2.029 Windows. Can someone who observed the original bug confirm that it is fixed? --

[Issue 2917] std.date fails for all years before 1970

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2917 --- Comment #1 from ghaec...@idworld.net 2009-05-04 05:39 --- Created an attachment (id=348) -- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=348action=view) patch for std.date.d v. 2.029 fixes issues with negative time values

[Issue 911] expression.c:4257: virtual Expression* DotIdExp::semantic(Scope*): Assertion `0' failed.

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=911 clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1984] Assertion failure: 'e1-type' on line 1198 in file 'constfold.c'

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1984 --- Comment #2 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-05-04 07:11 --- Reduced test case shows it's a problem with CTFE and AA literals. immutable bool [int] map = [ 4:true, 5:true ]; int foo () { foreach (x; map.keys) {} return 3;

[Issue 302] in/out contract inheritance yet to be implemented

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=302 --- Comment #12 from ma...@pochta.ru 2009-05-04 08:11 --- Caller can't check descendant contracts, which can succeed. --

[Issue 2913] aliasing a ref type is not possible

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2913 --- Comment #3 from ma...@pochta.ru 2009-05-04 08:44 --- dup of bug 2753? --

[Issue 2935] New: ICE(out.c) using struct with constructor as function default argument

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2935 Summary: ICE(out.c) using struct with constructor as function default argument Product: D Version: 2.029 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW

[Issue 1994] Assertion failure: 't-deco' on line 597 in file 'mtype.c'

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1994 clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ac...@free.fr ---

[Issue 2589] assertion failure when a struct contains a forward referenced, aliased function member.

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2589 clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2934] New: .dup does not return empty string

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2934 Summary: .dup does not return empty string Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 2934] .dup does not return empty string

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2934 schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: [Issue 2934] .dup does not return empty string

2009-05-04 Thread Derek Parnell
On Mon, 4 May 2009 17:44:56 + (UTC), d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2934 schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: [Issue 2934] .dup does not return empty string

2009-05-04 Thread Steven Schveighoffer
On Mon, 04 May 2009 16:56:49 -0400, Derek Parnell de...@psych.ward wrote: On Mon, 4 May 2009 17:44:56 + (UTC), d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2934 schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: [Issue 2934] .dup does not return empty string

2009-05-04 Thread Derek Parnell
On Mon, 04 May 2009 17:16:45 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: what's not intuitive is comparing an array (which is a struct) to null. Hmmm ... interesting. I regard the array not as a struct but as a concept implemented in D as a struct. char[] arr1 = ; char[] arr2 = null; assert(arr1

[Issue 2936] New: std.regex.match() short string optimization

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2936 Summary: std.regex.match() short string optimization Product: D Version: 2.029 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: performance Severity:

[Issue 2863] Assertion failure: '0' on line 935 in file 'glue.c'

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2863 dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2251] ICE: Variadic templates and auto return types don't work together.

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2251 dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com ---

[Issue 2937] New: postblit not called for foreach arg over array of structs

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2937 Summary: postblit not called for foreach arg over array of structs Product: D Version: 2.029 Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 2937] postblit not called for foreach arg over array of structs

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2937 --- Comment #1 from crist...@zerobugs.org 2009-05-04 23:25 --- Created an attachment (id=349) -- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=349action=view) test case --

[Issue 2939] New: lazy evaluation not invoked for lambda function

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2939 Summary: lazy evaluation not invoked for lambda function Product: D Version: 2.029 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 2938] New: incorrect code generated for assignment to assoc array element

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2938 Summary: incorrect code generated for assignment to assoc array element Product: D Version: 2.029 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 2939] lazy evaluation not invoked for lambda function

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2939 --- Comment #2 from jarrett.billings...@gmail.com 2009-05-05 00:17 --- Also, this happens in D1 as well. I'm never clear on what should be done with the bug versions in these cases.. --

[Issue 2939] lazy evaluation not invoked for lambda function

2009-05-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2939 clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.029 |1.042 --- Comment #3