[Issue 2567] Option To Not Treat Warnings As Errors
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2567 --- Comment #1 from cbkbbej...@mailinator.com 2009-05-10 01:06 --- Created an attachment (id=354) -- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=354action=view) Patch against 1.043 --
std.getopt RangeError
Currently, using std.getopt will result in a RangeError if parameters
are improperly omitted on the command line. Since this is a reasonable
user-error, it does not seem like something to crash on during release.
The problem is here:
if (!isDelegateWithLessThanTwoParameters !val
!incremental) {
// eat the next argument too
val = args[i];
args = args[0 .. i] ~ args[i + 1 .. $];
}
It just needs a check to see if args.length is high enough for this to
happen. And the documentation should note the exception it throws;
currently it says only a ConvError is thrown.
-[Unknown]
[Issue 2957] pardon the junk bug
http://d-new.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2957 Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #7 from Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com 2009-05-10 01:02:38 PDT --- yay -- Configure issuemail: http://d-new.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
Brad Roberts wrote: Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it to a new host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm Seattle time. The process shouldn't take all that long, but I'll estimate an hour just to give myself some padding time. Later, Brad Ok.. I've changed the dns entry to the new server, so as soon as it propagates around the world, the new site will be active. I'm sure it's not perfect yet.. but it's good enough to open up. Please file bug reports against puremagic.com if you find something wrong or missing. I haven't fully incorporated all of the customizations I'd made to the previous version, but at least the posting to the newsgroups part works again. Later, Brad
[Issue 2958] New: std.getopt RangeError on missing arg
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2958
Summary: std.getopt RangeError on missing arg
Product: D
Version: 2.030
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: bugzi...@digitalmars.com
ReportedBy: unkn...@simplemachines.org
Currently, using std.getopt will result in a RangeError if parameters are
improperly omitted on the command line. Since this is a reasonable user-error,
it does not seem like something to crash on during release.
The problem is here:
if (!isDelegateWithLessThanTwoParameters !val !incremental) {
// eat the next argument too
val = args[i];
args = args[0 .. i] ~ args[i + 1 .. $];
}
It just needs a check to see if args.length is high enough for this to happen.
And the documentation should note the exception it throws; currently it says
only a ConvError is thrown.
-[Unknown]
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
known bugzilla issue #1
I know I need to suppress the last couple lines of bugzilla posts with the Configure and why the mail is being received parts. How that part is generated changed a lot between the old and new versions of bugzilla so it'll take me a tad more work to fix that up. This part: -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- Later, Brad
bugzilla email
A while ago the inbound mail into bugzilla from replies to this group broke. I figured out why, but the fix wasn't pleasant -- the perl code wasn't compatible with a perl upgrade (5.8 - 5.10). The migration I did tonight ought to make it possible for me to put that mechanism back together.. however I figured I'd take a poll. Who found it useful and/or desirable? It's been disabled long enough that I figured I should see if it's worth re-instating. Thanks, Brad
Re: bugzilla email
Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote in message news:mailman.33.1241944005.13405.digitalmars-d-b...@puremagic.com... A while ago the inbound mail into bugzilla from replies to this group broke. I figured out why, but the fix wasn't pleasant -- the perl code wasn't compatible with a perl upgrade (5.8 - 5.10). The migration I did tonight ought to make it possible for me to put that mechanism back together.. however I figured I'd take a poll. Who found it useful and/or desirable? It's been disabled long enough that I figured I should see if it's worth re-instating. Thanks, Brad I didn't know there was ever such a feature :) Personally, I'm fairly accustomed to adding replies on the actual web-page interface.
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote in message news:mailman.31.1241943078.13405.digitalmars-d-b...@puremagic.com... Brad Roberts wrote: Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it to a new host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm Seattle time. The process shouldn't take all that long, but I'll estimate an hour just to give myself some padding time. Later, Brad Ok.. I've changed the dns entry to the new server, so as soon as it propagates around the world, the new site will be active. I'm sure it's not perfect yet.. but it's good enough to open up. Please file bug reports against puremagic.com if you find something wrong or missing. I haven't fully incorporated all of the customizations I'd made to the previous version, but at least the posting to the newsgroups part works again. Later, Brad Whooo, it's very pretty :)
samples of D2 can't be compiled
Hi, inorder to learn D, I try to compile some samples of D2.029, but failed. I found the reason was that some functions had been changed. For example, in listener.d, the std.conv.toUshort(args[1]) is not appeared in D2 any more, std.conv.to!(ushort)(string) should be used instead. I mean, if are there some bugs in D2's phobos lib? And, if I run all.sh in samples/d on Linux, there are some many errors. Can these will to be corrected? Thanks zsx
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 Anyone else notice this?
[Issue 2960] New: CTFE rejects static array to dynamic array casts
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2960
Summary: CTFE rejects static array to dynamic array casts
Product: D
Version: 1.043
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: patch, rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: bugzi...@digitalmars.com
ReportedBy: kamm-removet...@incasoftware.de
Test case:
char[] foo(char[] source) { return ; }
const v = bar;
const r = foo(v);
Result:
Error: cannot evaluate foo(cast(char[])v) at compile time
This works in D2 because of changes to Cast in constfold.c. LDC backported the
changes by adding this code from the D2 frontend:
if (e1-op == TOKstring)
{
if (tb-ty == Tarray typeb-ty == Tarray
tb-nextOf()-size() == typeb-nextOf()-size())
{
return expType(to, e1);
}
}
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
Jarrett Billingsley wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 Anyone else notice this? It's kind of a mess on Safari. I'll file a report :-)
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
Sean Kelly wrote: Jarrett Billingsley wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 Anyone else notice this? It's kind of a mess on Safari. I'll file a report :-) I don't see that problem at all using windows firefox 3.0.10. I suggest flushing your cache.. make sure you've got current .css files. Later, Brad
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Jarrett Billingsley jarrett.billings...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 Anyone else notice this? Yup!
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote: Sean Kelly wrote: Jarrett Billingsley wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 Anyone else notice this? It's kind of a mess on Safari. I'll file a report :-) I don't see that problem at all using windows firefox 3.0.10. I suggest flushing your cache.. make sure you've got current .css files. You're right, a proper reload fixed it ! :) Later, Brad
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote: Sean Kelly wrote: Jarrett Billingsley wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 Anyone else notice this? It's kind of a mess on Safari. I'll file a report :-) I don't see that problem at all using windows firefox 3.0.10. I suggest flushing your cache.. make sure you've got current .css files. You're right, a proper reload fixed it ! :) Yup. Same here.
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote: I don't see that problem at all using windows firefox 3.0.10. I suggest flushing your cache.. make sure you've got current .css files. Later, Brad Oh, nice, that worked!
[Issue 2567] [patch] Option To Not Treat Warnings As Errors
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2567 Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||llu...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2009-05-10 14:15:38 PDT --- It seems that your patch has some small indentation issues, see http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=354action=diff#..\..\..\..\dmd.1.043\dmd\src\dmd/mars.c_sec4 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2346] ICE when comparing typedef'd class
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2346
--- Comment #3 from Charles Hixson charleshi...@earthlink.net 2009-05-10
14:56:04 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=355)
-- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=355)
Work in progress: analogous to a single level B+Tree
Internal error: e2ir.c 4339
This is code that was compiling using
Digital Mars D Compiler v2.029
dmd -c -Dddocs chunkf.d
until I did a little bit of refactoring.
It's not clear to me how to reduce this and still retain the error, but if I
comment out lines 115-116,
//foreach(Wrd w;freqWrd)
//{temp2 [w.name]=w.id;}
then the error message goes away. (Of course, it's useless for *my* purposes,
but I hope it narrows down what the error could be.)
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2933] Cannot return const/immutable with contracts (out/invariant) enabled
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2933 --- Comment #1 from Shin Fujishiro rsi...@gmail.com 2009-05-10 15:17:32 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=356) -- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=356) This patch should fix the problem. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2961] New: some sets of files compiled with (-w -inline -release) cause the linker error /PAGESIZE:16 is too small
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2961 Summary: some sets of files compiled with (-w -inline -release) cause the linker error /PAGESIZE:16 is too small Product: D Version: 2.029 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Optlink AssignedTo: bugzi...@digitalmars.com ReportedBy: one_mad_al...@hotmail.com I'm trying to get my port of the WIN32 headers working with Digital Mars D Compiler v2.029 (see the dsource project core32) the minium set I can find to reproduce the issue is set FLGS=-w -inline -release dmd %FLGS% -c win32/com/OAIDL.d -I.. . etc lib -c win32.lib d3d8types.obj d3d8caps.obj dxerr8.obj DOCOBJ.obj OBJIDL.obj extras.obj MSHTMHST.obj OLEIDL.obj OAIDL.obj EXDISP.obj Digital Mars Librarian Version 8.02n Copyright (C) Digital Mars 2000-2007 All Rights Reserved http://www.digitalmars.com/ctg/lib.html Error: /PAGESIZE:16 is too small N.B. this only appears with BOTH -release and -inline -release -O or -inline -O does not cause the error. as I'm not too sure what the error means I'm at a bit of a loss to make a small test file that reproduces the error. I've not attached any files as they can all be obtained from svn ci http://svn.dsource.org/projects/core32/trunk/ -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
Thanks for taking care of this, Brad!
Re: bugzilla email
Brad Roberts wrote: Who found it useful and/or desirable? I think it's useful and desirable, as otherwise there'll be two separate threads about each bug.
