http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|spec|patch
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2569
--- Comment #1 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-07-21 00:18:03 PDT ---
This isn't complicated. The only reason it doesn't work is that
BinExp::interpretAssignCommon in interpret.c doesn't deal with array assignment
AT ALL.
Adding a
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1956
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=718
--- Comment #5 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-07-21 07:14:26 PDT ---
In fact this bug is now 66% of the remaining dstress cases which ICE, and also
10% of the remaining dstress unexpected pass errors...
Of course, it's pretty ridiculous
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3198
Summary: wrong initializer for structs arrays
Product: D
Version: 1.046
Platform: x86
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: major
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2973
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2973
--- Comment #3 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2009-07-21 19:55:36 PDT
---
Couldn't you just stick an assert in there to make sure it doesn't wrap around?
I haven't tested, but I would think that even in debug mode, this would be
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2973
--- Comment #4 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2009-07-21
20:15:20 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Couldn't you just stick an assert in there to make sure it doesn't wrap
around?
I haven't tested, but I would think
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3202
--- Comment #1 from ZHOU Zhenyu rin...@gmail.com 2009-07-21 22:54:26 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Maybe the while loop should be put into pow(F, uint) instead of pow(F, int)
like the following:
what about:
pure nothrow F pow(F)(F x,
