[Issue 3378] [tdpl] ++x should be an lvalue

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3378 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3407] [tdpl] Compiling with -safe -release must keep all bound checks

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3407 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3390] [tdpl] out(result) contract should not be able to rebind result

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3390 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3537] New: Casting objects with alias this takes the subtype

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3537 Summary: Casting objects with alias this takes the subtype Product: D Version: 2.036 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 3538] New: Default value of alias template parameter is instantiated only once.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3538 Summary: Default value of alias template parameter is instantiated only once. Product: D Version: 2.036 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 3539] New: Template instantiation fails in an obscured way. See details.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3539 Summary: Template instantiation fails in an obscured way. See details. Product: D Version: 2.036 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 3433] [tdpl] Comparing structs for equality is not member-by-member

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3433 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3540] New: Another DWARF line number fix

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3540 Summary: Another DWARF line number fix Product: D Version: 1.051 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: patch, wrong-code Severity: normal

[Issue 3214] Incorrect DWARF line number debugging information on Linux

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3214 nfx...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||3540 --- Comment #3 from

Re: new D newsgroups

Walter wrote: It turns out, that the first step in getting the newsgroups here propagated is they have to be renamed. Ah, mass-marketing. A sign of a dead company. Rember Borland? Walter, surely you can relate. Borland circa 1993. Continued the downhill for 2 decades. Are you on the same

Re: new D newsgroups

AJ wrote: Walter wrote: It turns out, that the first step in getting the newsgroups here propagated is they have to be renamed. Ah, mass-marketing. A sign of a dead company. Rember Borland? Walter, surely you can relate. Borland circa 1993. Continued the downhill for 2 decades. Are you on

Re: new D newsgroups

Walter wrote: Matthew matthew@stlsoft.dot.org wrote in message news:c6kf86$2d9...@digitaldaemon.com... Why does the original D have to die (or be ignored)? I don't get it. It seems like a mistake to me. Because with a one letter name for the forum, it will never get propagated and (as