[Issue 3679] template forward reference regression

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3679 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.032 |1.047 --- Comment #1 from

[Issue 918] (D1 only): Template order matter, version block change something with typedef, and another template bug.

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=918 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 2393] IFTI regression(D1 only) on (T:char)(T[]) vs (T:dchar)(T[])

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2393 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 3740] New: build tango error

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 Summary: build tango error Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 3679] template forward reference regression

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3679 --- Comment #2 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-01-25 02:07:38 PST --- The regression was caused by adding a couple of lines to ClassDeclaration::semantic(Scope *sc) in class.c in D1.047. I think this was probably part of the fix for bug

[Issue 2917] std.date fails for all years before 1970

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2917 --- Comment #4 from Glenn Haecker ghaec...@idworld.net 2010-01-25 02:59:44 PST --- Created an attachment (id=555) patch for std.date.d v.2.039 fixes issues with negative time values -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 2917] std.date fails for all years before 1970

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2917 --- Comment #5 from Glenn Haecker ghaec...@idworld.net 2010-01-25 03:12:00 PST --- Created an attachment (id=556) date_assert.d contains assertions for date.d v2.039 patch date_assert.d contains test cases, both to demonstrate what's wrong

[Issue 3740] Regression: class with fwd reference of a nested struct breaks abstract

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 3737] SEG-V at expression.c:6255 from bad code

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3737 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Issue 3741] New: std.date YearFromTime broken or very slow

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3741 Summary: std.date YearFromTime broken or very slow Product: D Version: 1.055 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 3737] SEG-V at expression.c:6255 from bad code

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3737 --- Comment #3 from BCS shro8...@vandals.uidaho.edu 2010-01-25 10:32:24 PST --- What version of DMD? I got it with 2.039 on both windows and linux. Might it already be fixed in SVN? -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 3737] SEG-V at expression.c:6255 from bad code

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3737 --- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-01-25 12:22:35 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) What version of DMD? I got it with 2.039 on both windows and linux. Might it already be fixed in SVN? I can reproduce it now. I think I had

[Issue 3737] SEG-V at expression.c:6255 from bad code

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3737 --- Comment #5 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-01-25 13:01:07 PST --- Reduced test case. Something to do with opDispatch. == int crayon; struct SIB(alias junk) { template Alike(V) { enum bool Alike = Q ==

[Issue 3742] New: Please add support for 'Lightweight Profiling' which adds a set of user-controlled counters to the AMD64 architecture

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3742 Summary: Please add support for 'Lightweight Profiling' which adds a set of user-controlled counters to the AMD64 architecture Product: D Version: future Platform:

[Issue 3742] Please add support for 'Lightweight Profiling' which adds a set of user-controlled counters to the AMD64 architecture

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3742 nick barbalich nick.barbal...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||performance

[Issue 3742] Please add support for 'Lightweight Profiling' which adds a set of user-controlled counters to the AMD64 architecture

2010-01-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3742 Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bra...@puremagic.com