http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3679
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.032 |1.047
--- Comment #1 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=918
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2393
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3740
Summary: build tango error
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3679
--- Comment #2 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-01-25 02:07:38 PST ---
The regression was caused by adding a couple of lines to
ClassDeclaration::semantic(Scope *sc) in class.c in D1.047.
I think this was probably part of the fix for bug
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2917
--- Comment #4 from Glenn Haecker ghaec...@idworld.net 2010-01-25 02:59:44
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=555)
patch for std.date.d v.2.039 fixes issues with negative time values
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2917
--- Comment #5 from Glenn Haecker ghaec...@idworld.net 2010-01-25 03:12:00
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=556)
date_assert.d contains assertions for date.d v2.039 patch
date_assert.d contains test cases, both to demonstrate what's wrong
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3740
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3737
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3741
Summary: std.date YearFromTime broken or very slow
Product: D
Version: 1.055
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3737
--- Comment #3 from BCS shro8...@vandals.uidaho.edu 2010-01-25 10:32:24 PST
---
What version of DMD? I got it with 2.039 on both windows and linux. Might it
already be fixed in SVN?
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3737
--- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-01-25 12:22:35 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
What version of DMD? I got it with 2.039 on both windows and linux. Might it
already be fixed in SVN?
I can reproduce it now. I think I had
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3737
--- Comment #5 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-01-25 13:01:07 PST ---
Reduced test case. Something to do with opDispatch.
==
int crayon;
struct SIB(alias junk)
{
template Alike(V) {
enum bool Alike = Q ==
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3742
Summary: Please add support for 'Lightweight Profiling' which
adds a set of user-controlled counters to the AMD64
architecture
Product: D
Version: future
Platform:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3742
nick barbalich nick.barbal...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||performance
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3742
Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bra...@puremagic.com
16 matches
Mail list logo