[Issue 3744] __traits getMember error in checking of second argument

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3744 --- Comment #1 from iorlas denis.tomi...@gmail.com 2010-01-27 00:14:04 PST --- I've tried to fix this problem and I've found this part of code, what can say about this problem: Object *o = (Object *)args-data[0]; Expression *e =

[Issue 3602] ICE(tocsym.c) compiling a class, if its super class has preconditions

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3602 --- Comment #2 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-01-27 00:46:38 PST --- This is crashing because the contracts are implemented as functions fdrequire, fdensure, which are NESTED functions of the function ('paint()') being called.

[Issue 3744] __traits getMember error in checking of second argument

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3744 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 3744] __traits getMember error in checking of second argument

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3744 --- Comment #3 from iorlas denis.tomi...@gmail.com 2010-01-27 01:41:07 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) e-optimize(WANTvalue|WANTinterpret) should have turned it into a TOKstring. If it's still a TOKvar, then the problem is in e-optimize or

[Issue 3744] __traits getMember error in checking of second argument

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3744 --- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-01-27 02:20:05 PST --- Just had a look at your test code. The problem lies here: foreach(string m; a){ __traits(getMember, Check, m) } m is not a compile-time constant. Of

[Issue 2712] error with passing an array slot as another array length to new

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2712 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 3597] Need single source for parser and documentation grammar.

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3597 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 3574] post-condition is not evaluated if there is no return statement

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3574 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 3744] __traits getMember error in checking of second argument

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3744 --- Comment #5 from iorlas denis.tomi...@gmail.com 2010-01-27 03:05:12 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) Just had a look at your test code. The problem lies here: foreach(string m; a){ __traits(getMember, Check, m) } m is

[Issue 1811] TypeInfo usage leads to seg fault at runtime

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1811 Alexey Ivanov aifg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 3709] Associative array of associative arrays gets confused

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3709 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Issue 3740] Regression: class with fwd reference of a nested struct breaks abstract

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3740] Regression: class with fwd reference of a nested struct breaks abstract

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||llu...@gmail.com

[Issue 3745] New: Linking error with associative array of arrays

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3745 Summary: Linking error with associative array of arrays Product: D Version: 2.039 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 3746] New: Misleding error message OP has no effect in expression XXX), in void function

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3746 Summary: Misleding error message OP has no effect in expression XXX), in void function Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 3746] Misleding error message OP has no effect in expression XXX), in void function

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3746 Witold Baryluk bary...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor --

[Issue 3746] Misleding error message OP has no effect in expression XXX), in void function

2010-01-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3746 Bernard Helyer blood.of.l...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|