[Issue 3986] Struct constructors bypass default initialization of member variables
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3986 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #2 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-03-27 00:34:11 PDT --- changeset 421 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4013] New: Inconsistent codeview debug info for classes derived from IUnknown
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4013
Summary: Inconsistent codeview debug info for classes derived
from IUnknown
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: r.sagita...@gmx.de
--- Comment #0 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-03-27 01:14:34
PDT ---
IUnknown and any class derived from it have inconsistent codeview debug info:
dmd -g -c lib
module lib;
interface IUnknown
{
void foo();
}
compiles to
$$TYPESsegment
00: LF_ARGLIST argcount=0
01: LF_VTSHAPE count=1 05
02: LF_CLASS count=1 typidx 1007 property=x dList vshape
1001 length=x lib.IUnknown
03: LF_CLASS count=0 typidx property=x0080 dList vshape
length=x IUnknown
04: LF_POINTER x000a typidx 1003
...
and later referencing the incomplete type 1003. Please note that the class is
called lib.IUnknown in one entry, but IUnknown in the other.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4013] Inconsistent codeview debug info for classes derived from IUnknown
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4013 Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch, wrong-code --- Comment #1 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-03-27 01:16:14 PDT --- This is caused by using sym-toPrettyChars() most of the time, but sometimes not on cpp-interfaces. I think toPrettyChars() should always be used. Here's a patch: Index: toctype.c === --- toctype.c(revision 419) +++ toctype.c(working copy) @@ -381,8 +381,12 @@ /* Need this symbol to do C++ name mangling */ -const char *name = sym-isCPPinterface() ? sym-ident-toChars() - : sym-toPrettyChars(); +const char *name = sym-toPrettyChars(); s = symbol_calloc(name); s-Sclass = SCstruct; s-Sstruct = struct_calloc(); -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4014] New: CodeView debug type info not linked in from library
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4014
Summary: CodeView debug type info not linked in from library
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: r.sagita...@gmx.de
--- Comment #0 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-03-27 01:33:12
PDT ---
If a class is defined in a library, the debug info describing that class is not
linked into an executable, if it does not reference the init-property.
Example:
module lib;
struct struc_lib
{
int a, b;
}
dmd -g -lib lib
module test;
import lib;
void main()
{
struc_lib slib;
}
dmd -g test lib.lib
This produces incomplete debug info for struc_lib.
Using
struc_lib slib = struc_lib.init;
helps.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2085] CTFE fails if the function is forward referenced
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2085
Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-03-27 05:53:06
PDT ---
Here's patch that invokes the semantic on the function if referenced.
Additioally, it needs to avoid duplicate semantic to be run later.
This patch also fixes #3499
Index: expression.c
===
--- expression.c(revision 421)
+++ expression.c(working copy)
@@ -2427,7 +2427,8 @@
f = s-isFuncDeclaration();
if (f)
{//printf('%s' is a function\n, f-toChars());
-
+if (!f-originalType f-scope) // semantic not yet run
+f-semantic(f-scope);
if (!f-type-deco)
{
error(forward reference to %s, toChars());
Index: func.c
===
--- func.c(revision 421)
+++ func.c(working copy)
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@
parent = sc-parent;
Dsymbol *parent = toParent();
-if (semanticRun == PASSsemanticdone)
+if (semanticRun = PASSsemanticdone) // BUG 2085
{
if (!parent-isClassDeclaration())
return;
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4017] New: const initializer cannot evaluate size of forward referenced alias
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4017
Summary: const initializer cannot evaluate size of forward
referenced alias
Product: D
Version: 2.041
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: patch, rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: r.sagita...@gmx.de
--- Comment #0 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-03-27 06:00:38
PDT ---
struct _A
{
uint data;
}
const A_SIZE = (A.sizeof);
alias _A A;
yields:
test.d(9): Error: size of type _A is not known
Here's the patch
Index: expression.c
===
--- expression.c(revision 421)
+++ expression.c(working copy)
@@ -6096,6 +6096,7 @@
#endif
else
{
+e1 = e1-semantic(sc);
e = e1-type-dotExp(sc, e1, ident);
if (!(flag e-op == TOKdotti))// let CallExp::semantic() handle
this
e = e-semantic(sc);
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1266] Cannot forward reference the typeof of the base type of a pointer whose base type is defined with typeof
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1266 Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de --- Comment #7 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-03-27 06:05:49 PDT --- Here's a patch, but I am not 100% sure, whether the scope is correct for the type aswell. Index: expression.c === --- expression.c(revision 421) +++ expression.c(working copy) @@ -7432,6 +7432,7 @@ error(can only * a pointer, not a '%s', e1-type-toChars()); return new ErrorExp(); } +type = type-semantic(e1-loc, sc); // correct scope? rvalue(); } return this; -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 461] Constant not understood to be constant when circular module dependency exists.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=461
Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-03-27 06:11:09
PDT ---
Semantics is not yet run on the SIZE identifier, so dmd does not know, it is
const. The patch invokes semantics if not yet run.
Index: optimize.c
===
--- optimize.c(revision 421)
+++ optimize.c(working copy)
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@
Expression *e = NULL;
if (!v)
return e;
+if (!v-originalType v-scope) // semantic() not yet run - BUG 461
+v-semantic (v-scope);
if (v-isConst() || v-isImmutable() || v-storage_class STCmanifest)
{
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2386] Array of forward referenced struct doesn't compile
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2386
Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-03-27 06:17:13
PDT ---
Here's a patch that simply invokes the semantics of the forward referenced
struct.
Index: struct.c
===
--- struct.c(revision 421)
+++ struct.c(working copy)
@@ -115,6 +115,8 @@
//printf(AggregateDeclaration::size() = %d\n, structsize);
if (!members)
error(loc, unknown size);
+if (sizeok != 1 scope)
+semantic(NULL);
if (sizeok != 1)
{error(loc, no size yet for forward reference);
//*(char*)0=0;
This patch also fixes #2654
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2654] Forward reference error with array of struct and circular import
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2654 Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de --- Comment #3 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-03-27 06:18:36 PDT --- Although the test case looks a bit different, the patch for #2386 also fixes this issue -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 945] template forward reference with named nested struct only
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=945
Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-03-27 06:22:43
PDT ---
Here's a patch that invokes the missing semantics. It also fixes issue #1055
Index: struct.c
===
--- struct.c(revision 421)
+++ struct.c(working copy)
@@ -178,6 +178,8 @@
error(cannot have field %s with same struct type, v-toChars());
}
#endif
+if (ts-sym-sizeok != 1 ts-sym-scope)
+ts-sym-semantic(NULL);
if (ts-sym-sizeok != 1)
{
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1055] union forward reference overlapping initialization error
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1055 Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de --- Comment #5 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-03-27 06:26:03 PDT --- although #945 seems completely unrelated, the patch there also fixes this issue including the dstress-tests. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 102] Forward reference nested class wheel.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102 --- Comment #13 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2010-03-27 06:29:36 PDT --- As much as I can see, all test cases in this report compile since dmd 1.054 and dmd 2.038. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 102] Forward reference nested class wheel.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #14 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-03-27 06:46:57 PDT --- (In reply to comment #13) As much as I can see, all test cases in this report compile since dmd 1.054 and dmd 2.038. Confirmed. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3912] pure static nested functions are not recognized as pure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3912 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-03-27 07:49:36 PDT --- Fixed DMD2.042. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3930] AAs horribly broken
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3930 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-03-27 07:50:20 PDT --- Fixed DMD2.042. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4018] New: Line Number not set at instatiation point
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4018
Summary: Line Number not set at instatiation point
Product: D
Version: 2.041
Platform: Other
URL: http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/template.html#TemplateVal
ueParameter
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com
CC: jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com 2010-03-27
09:30:37 PDT ---
The specification states that:
The __FILE__ and __LINE__ expand to the source file name and line number at the
point of instantiation.
This is not the case for the code below:
---
import std.stdio;
void ODSfd(alias n)() {
writefln(%s:%s | %s = %d, __FILE__, __LINE__, n.stringof, n);
}
void ODSfs(alias n)() {
writefln(%s:%s | %s = %s, __FILE__, __LINE__, n.stringof, n);
}
void ODSfx(alias n)() {
writefln(%s:%s | %s = 0x%08x, __FILE__, __LINE__, n.stringof, n);
}
void main() {
int zbar = 5;
string foo = hi;
ODSfd!(zbar);
ODSfs!(foo);
ODSfx!(zbar);
}
---
Expected output:
file.d:17 | zbar = 5
file.d:18 | foo = hi
file.d:19 | zbar = 0x0005
Actual output:
file.d:4 | zbar = 5
file.d:7 | foo = hi
file.d:10 | zbar = 0x0005
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4018] Line Number not set at instatiation point
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4018 Justin Spahr-Summers justin.spahrsumm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||justin.spahrsumm...@gmail.c ||om --- Comment #1 from Justin Spahr-Summers justin.spahrsumm...@gmail.com 2010-03-27 11:44:50 CDT --- (In reply to comment #0) Note that the docs say that referring to template value parameters. The code you posted is intended behavior; you would have to add a couple value parameters to each one that default to __FILE__ and __LINE__ and print those out. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4018] Line Number not set at instatiation point
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4018
Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version|Linux |All
--- Comment #2 from Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com 2010-03-27
09:55:31 PDT ---
In that case, the below has the same result.
import std.stdio;
void ODSfd(alias n, string file = __FILE__, int line = __LINE__)() {
writefln(%s:%s | %s = %d, file, line, n.stringof, n);
}
void ODSfs(alias n, string file = __FILE__, int line = __LINE__)() {
writefln(%s:%s | %s = %s, file, line, n.stringof, n);
}
void ODSfx(alias n, string file = __FILE__, int line = __LINE__)() {
writefln(%s:%s | %s = 0x%08x, file, line, n.stringof, n);
}
void main() {
int zbar = 5;
string foo = hi;
ODSfd!(zbar);
ODSfs!(foo);
ODSfx!(zbar);
}
-
Expected Output:
linefile.d:17 | zbar = 5
linefile.d:18 | foo = hi
linefile.d:19 | zbar = 0x0005
Actual Output:
linefile.d:3 | zbar = 5
linefile.d:6 | foo = hi
linefile.d:9 | zbar = 0x0005
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2460] Ref functions can't be template functions.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2460 Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@kyllingen.net Severity|minor |major --- Comment #1 from Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net 2010-03-27 11:27:51 PDT --- Raising importance, since operator overloading is now done with templated functions, and this will become a major pain in the long run. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3987] [gdb] Invalid DWARF output for function pointers
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3987
--- Comment #1 from Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com 2010-03-27
12:01:39 PDT ---
Compile with:
$ dmd -c -gc test.d
$ gcc test.o -o test -m32
(Note: I had a dmd.conf in the same directory to make sure druntime/phobos
weren't included, I don't know if this is needed)
void function() foobar;
extern(C)void _Dmodule_ref(){}
extern(C)int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
return 0;
}
//void foo(){}
//void main(){}
Uncommenting either of the 2 functions at the bottom will trigger the bug, but
without them it does not happen. I have attached 3 files, which are the outputs
of the following 3 commands:
$ objdump --dwarf test dwarf2
$ objdump --dwarf test dwarf # With void main(){}
$ diff -u dwarf2 dwarf
Hopefully this should help figure out what's happening. Without reading into
the DWARF spec I cannot figure out what's wrong, but there's not a huge amount
of difference between them, so it shouldn't take too much effort for someone
who knows the spec to figure out what's wrong. The above was tested with dmd
2.042.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1188] Phobos doesn't correctly parse command-line arguments containing international characters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1188 --- Comment #2 from Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com 2010-03-27 12:02:38 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=590) objdump --dwarf test dwarf -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1188] Phobos doesn't correctly parse command-line arguments containing international characters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1188 --- Comment #3 from Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com 2010-03-27 12:03:10 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=591) objdump --dwarf test dwarf2 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1188] Phobos doesn't correctly parse command-line arguments containing international characters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1188 --- Comment #4 from Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com 2010-03-27 12:07:00 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=592) diff -u dwarf2 dwarf -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 1188] Phobos doesn't correctly parse command-line arguments containing international characters
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1188 Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rob...@octarineparrot.com --- Comment #5 from Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com 2010-03-27 12:08:48 PDT --- I have no idea why these patches were added to this issue, they were meant to be added to bug #3987... -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3987] [gdb] Invalid DWARF output for function pointers
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3987 --- Comment #2 from Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com 2010-03-27 12:12:48 PDT --- For some unknown reason (probably PEBKAC), the attachments were added to the wrong ticket... See: # objdump --dwarf test dwarf http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=590 # objdump --dwarf test dwarf2 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=591 # diff -u dwarf2 dwarf http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=592 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
