http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5039
Summary: Cannot use invariant() with auto methods
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5040
Summary: opOpAssign should be automatically visible for types.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3092
--- Comment #6 from Manuel K�nig manuel...@gmx.net 2010-10-11 08:12:47 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=782)
Patch for this bug created with svn diff mtype.c, apply in the frontend
directory
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3092
--- Comment #7 from Manuel K�nig manuel...@gmx.net 2010-10-11 08:17:19 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=783)
Testcase for dstress, add to dstress/compile/t
I'm not sure about the numbering scheme in dstress, I just used the next free
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3092
--- Comment #8 from Manuel K�nig manuel...@gmx.net 2010-10-11 08:17:55 PDT ---
I have now fixed the bug, it's a trivial 7 line patch which teaches
TypeSArray::resolve(...) to recognize if it's indexing a type element. Without
the patch,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3278
Manuel K�nig manuel...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manuel...@gmx.net
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3278
Manuel K�nig manuel...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |diagnostic
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3279
--- Comment #2 from Manuel K�nig manuel...@gmx.net 2010-10-11 10:24:49 PDT ---
*** Issue 3278 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3085
Manuel K�nig manuel...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||samu...@voliacable.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1503
Manuel K�nig manuel...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2446
Manuel K�nig manuel...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3085
Manuel K�nig manuel...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3546
Manuel K�nig manuel...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manuel...@gmx.net
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4375
--- Comment #13 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-10-11 13:09:16 PDT ---
Just for reference this is what Wikipedia says about the Ada language:
Conditional statements are closed with end if, avoiding a dangling else that
could pair with the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5002
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Gibson metalcae...@gmail.com 2010-10-11 13:20:40
PDT ---
It will probably be deprecated, but at this time it isn't (there is no
alternative yet, anyway).
However I just realized that my idea for read() can't be
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4725
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-10-11 13:33:52 PDT ---
One test case for sum():
import std.algorithm: sum;
void main() {
bool[] array = [true, false, true, true];
assert(sum(array) == 3);
}
Currently this doesn't
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5041
Summary: Cannot check functor in template constraint
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: minor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5043
Summary: writeln with empty arrays should write something
useful
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5043
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3813
--- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-10-11 16:20:06 PDT ---
See also bug 5043
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5045
Summary: auto type inference for nest function
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
21 matches
Mail list logo