http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
--- Comment #15 from wfunct...@hotmail.com 2011-08-06 23:39:13 PDT ---
Er, slight typo copy/pasting your own argument:
This:
... are that it's slightly cleaner because the comment tokens aren't there,
and that the compiler complains if you
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
--- Comment #14 from wfunct...@hotmail.com 2011-08-06 23:36:25 PDT ---
The _only_ things that this feature adds over using a comment are that it's
slightly cleaner because the comment tokens aren't there, and
the compiler complains if you
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2011-08-07 00:00:41
PDT ---
const, immutable, shared etc. have a large effect on the semantics of a
program. The compiler gives you additional guarantees as a result. e.g.
immutable
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
--- Comment #17 from wfunct...@hotmail.com 2011-08-07 00:22:55 PDT ---
const, immutable, shared etc. have a large effect on the semantics of a
program. The compiler gives you additional guarantees as a result. e.g.
immutable variables
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2011-08-07 00:39:42
PDT ---
And why would it matter that the function was ref instead of out? It's still
affecting the variable that's passed in either case. The fact that it's ref now
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
--- Comment #19 from wfunct...@hotmail.com 2011-08-07 00:45:04 PDT ---
The fact that it's ref now instead of out has no effect on the calling
function.
Yeah it does -- the caller now has to initialize it with something sensible
first.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2011-08-07 01:12:16
PDT ---
Well, I don't think that the feature adds enough of value to be worth adding to
the language. But it's not my decision. Discussion on the matter can help
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6445
Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6446
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-08-07 05:08:24 PDT ---
I have just compiled the latest DMD, druntime and Phobos, and I see some errors
still. Maybe it's my fault, I don't know.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6448
Summary: writef(%05d, BigInt) problem
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6449
Summary: Unused label warning
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5440
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2011-08-07 11:02:31 PDT ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/295
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
--- Comment #21 from wfunct...@hotmail.com 2011-08-07 11:16:43 PDT ---
Hmm... /maybe/ I'll try implementing it myself, although I'm not at all
familiar with the source code. Let's see how it goes, I'll post here if I get
anywhere.
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6450
Summary: struct tm definition too short in std.c.linux.linux
Product: D
Version: D1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6451
Summary: ICE(expression.c:4434): SymbolExp::SymbolExp(Loc, TOK,
int, Declaration*, int): Assertion `var' failed.
Product: D
Version: D1 D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6451
--- Comment #1 from Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com 2011-08-07
20:09:56 BST ---
Note that if you add the import as suggested by the error, the ICE goes away.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
--- Comment #22 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-08-07 13:30:59 PDT ---
I have a related but alternative proposal; to ask only for the out at the
calling point, make it obligatory if you compile with -warning and optional
otherwise (for a long
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6442
--- Comment #23 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-08-07 13:42:58 PDT ---
See also:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.Darticle_id=141999
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6445
--- Comment #4 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-08-07 13:41:31 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #0)
The following program uses over a gigabyte of memory at compile time. I
thought these kinds of issues were
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5689
--- Comment #1 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2011-08-07 17:37:49 PDT ---
Another case:
import std.random;
void main()
{
double r1=2*uniform(0.0, 1.0);
double r2=2*uniform(0.0, 1.0);
}
It only fails if both declarations are present.
20 matches
Mail list logo
