http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2237
Denis verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3960
--- Comment #19 from Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de 2012-02-09 01:15:45 PST
---
(In reply to comment #18)
Whether or not a parameter is used is unrelated to whether or not it has a
name.
You can't use an unnamed parameter, or can you?
What
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3960
--- Comment #20 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-02-09 03:09:09 PST ---
(In reply to comment #19)
Now the interface is happy, as is the compiler check, because we
made it clear, that we intended to ignore 'b'.
Indeed. Some C++
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3960
--- Comment #21 from Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de 2012-02-09 03:48:32 PST
---
You are right. Since local variables and parameters are related, it could be
that the person fixing this also thinks about the situation for function
parameters. A
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7469
--- Comment #1 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2012-02-09 04:36:14 PST ---
cat bug.d EOF
struct S128(T, int k=1)
{
}
version (A)
{
alias S128!(int) fooa;
alias S128!(int, 1) foob;
}
else
{
alias S128!(int, 1) fooa;
alias S128!(int)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7444
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-02-09 05:33:52 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
While I agree that the syntax should be enforced more strictly in general, I
still completely disagree with requiring [] on static array
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4088
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7444
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-02-09 06:31:34 PST ---
I'd like to provide an exhaustive test that should compile after fixing the
enhancement suggested by me and timon.
// X: Changed accepts-invalid to
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7444
--- Comment #4 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-02-09 07:01:17 PST ---
Maybe sa[] = da and da[] = da should be '// X' too.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2237
--- Comment #3 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-10 02:05:57 EST ---
Hmm, I think I must have put the wrong bug number in. I think this is a
duplicate of the D1 version of bug 2414. Now if only I could find the actual
bug... (I can
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7470
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5590
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE(e2ir.c): when using |Regression(2.036)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4269
--- Comment #16 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-02-09 07:55:58 PST ---
Even with the new patch, this example from comment 5 :
static if(is(typeof(X3.init))) {}
void X3(T3) { }
is an ICE(glue.c) for 2.047 on. It generated an error on 2.045
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4269
--- Comment #17 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-10 03:08:33 EST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Even with the new patch, this example from comment 5 :
static if(is(typeof(X3.init))) {}
void X3(T3) { }
is an ICE(glue.c) for 2.047
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5590
--- Comment #9 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-10 03:20:09 EST ---
For anyone interested in why this bug exists:
When the 'aa' of 'aa.values' reaches e2ir, it is an 'ArrayLiteralExp' but is
typed as the 'AssociativeArray' struct,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7363
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-09 08:35:01 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3960
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-02-09 08:42:51
PST ---
I know that Walter is against having warnings or errors for unused parameters
(he has _definitely_ said as much on the newsgroup), but he may feel
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7471
Summary: Improve performance of std.regex
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7407
timon.g...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7407
timon.g...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7472
Summary: __traits compiles/ is(typeof) don't work for invalid
type casts.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7473
Summary: [CTFE] Non-ref argument behaves as if it's a ref
argument
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7474
Summary: ICE cgcs.c 354 on instanciating a struct with field
and destructor as tuple
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7475
Summary: Regression(2.058 beta): Template member erroneously
inaccessible
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7476
Summary: Write(ln) functions no longer accept retro range
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7477
Summary: Enum structs without specified values
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4531
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=435
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joshuareu...@web.de
--- Comment #7
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6699
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7477
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6221
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=435
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5541
timon.g...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7478
Summary: dmd crashes while compiling
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7472
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
35 matches
Mail list logo
