[Issue 8928] Poor error message for derived class without constructor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8928 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-11-01 23:13:41 PDT --- Well, it really doesn't match the definition of synthesized at all, so I have to wonder about whoever picked it for C++. Regardless, using it in an error message like that isn't going to be clear to most programmers. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8498] modifying foreach range iterator fails in CTFE
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8498 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-11-01 23:49:34 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/b52dca5a53def60352dbcbf4f398c10abb2cb6b1 Fix issue 8498 modifying foreach range iterator fails in CTFE This was caused by ignoring assignment to ref variables. (These guys can only be created by the inliner, or by lowering, such as happens in foreach). Also fixes bug 7658: assignment to ref in foreach. Also fixes bug 8539: nested functions, ref parameter, -inline. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8498] modifying foreach range iterator fails in CTFE
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8498 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7658] [CTFE] assignment to reference in foreach fails without error message
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7658 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||yebbl...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 17:59:10 EST --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/b52dca5a53def60352dbcbf4f398c10abb2cb6b1 Fix issue 8498 modifying foreach range iterator fails in CTFE This was caused by ignoring assignment to ref variables. (These guys can only be created by the inliner, or by lowering, such as happens in foreach). Also fixes bug 7658: assignment to ref in foreach. Also fixes bug 8539: nested functions, ref parameter, -inline. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8539] -inline failure involving CTFE, nested functions, a ref parameter
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8539 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 18:00:34 EST --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/b52dca5a53def60352dbcbf4f398c10abb2cb6b1 Fix issue 8498 modifying foreach range iterator fails in CTFE This was caused by ignoring assignment to ref variables. (These guys can only be created by the inliner, or by lowering, such as happens in foreach). Also fixes bug 7658: assignment to ref in foreach. Also fixes bug 8539: nested functions, ref parameter, -inline. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8539] (D1 only) -inline failure involving CTFE, nested functions, a ref parameter
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8539 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||CTFE, ice, pull Version|D2 |D1 Summary|-inline failure involving |(D1 only) -inline failure |CTFE, nested functions, a |involving CTFE, nested |ref parameter |functions, a ref parameter --- Comment #2 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 18:01:26 EST --- Fixed D2, causes an ICE with D1: src\testx.d(6): Error: CTFE internal error: illegal reference value 0 Assertion failure: 'IsRefValueValid(newval)' on line 6243 in file 'interpret.c' abnormal program termination -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7688] Ddoc should give a list of inherited members
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7688 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 01:28:10 PDT --- I almost like Qt's documentation engine. For example: http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/qmenubar.html It lists overriden methods in 'Reimplemented' sections, and has a link to the inherited class. The latter could be incorporated via Issue 198 (man that's an ancient request). But I would prefer if we could list inherited (non-overriden) methods in some kind of html tree control that is minimized by default but can be expanded rather than having to click to open the base-class page. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2837] OPTLINK and LARGEADDRESSAWARE
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2837 --- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-11-02 01:30:36 PDT --- Generally, a program that consumes all of memory can bring the system to a halt. So only if your program really needs it should it be turned on. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 198] DDoc: superclass/interface decl expansion
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=198 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com AssignedTo|bugzi...@digitalmars.com|nob...@puremagic.com --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 01:54:21 PDT --- We could introduce DDOC_PSUPER_SYMBOL for base classes but also for enum base types. Can anyone chime in on whether this will be useful to have? I've got a pull ready if we're game. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3445] DDoc usually omits attributes (including pure nothrow)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3445 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 02:11:51 PDT --- Only case left is the template one, which is dup of Issue 194. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 194 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 194] DDoc: method-attributes ignored within templated class
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=194 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johnch_a...@hotmail.com --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 02:11:35 PDT --- *** Issue 2516 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 02:11:51 PDT --- *** Issue 3445 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 194] DDoc: method-attributes ignored within templated class
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=194 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johnch_a...@hotmail.com --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 02:11:35 PDT --- *** Issue 2516 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 02:11:51 PDT --- *** Issue 3445 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8933] New: -property switch and opDispatch for methods and properties
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8933
Summary: -property switch and opDispatch for methods and
properties
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: johnch_a...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #0 from johnch_a...@hotmail.com 2012-11-02 02:14:39 PDT ---
When the -property compiler switch is in effect, opDispatch cannot be used for
both methods and properties.
Currently, we can just omit the switch and things work fine. But if the
behaviour of the switch becomes the norm, this issue will have to be addressed.
struct Demo {
@property auto opDispatch(string name, A...)(auto ref A args) {}
}
void main() {
Demo d;
d.test(1); // method call OK
d.test(1,2); // ditto
d.test = 4;// property setter OK
d.test(1,2,3); // error, properties can only have zero, one, or two parameter
}
If you omit the @property attribute from the opDispatch definition, the
compiler complains 'not a property d.opDispatch!(test)'.
Perhaps the simplest fix would be for opDispatch to be excluded from any
property rules altogether.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 2516] DDoc omits static on templates
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2516 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 02:11:33 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 194 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8929] long.min is a Voldemort literal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8929 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|long.min is a Voldermort|long.min is a Voldemort |literal |literal --- Comment #2 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-11-02 03:17:37 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) (In reply to comment #0) It cannot be named. My *guess* is interprets the decimal number into a long, and afterwards, the sign is applied. This chokes in this particular case, because the valid range for longs is [-2^^63, 2^^63-1], so the interpreted number overflows before the compiler has a chance to apply the sign: Yes, of course that's what's happening. It is a number you cannot write as a literal, you can only use a euphemism like long.min or -2L^^63. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8720] ICE: Assertion failure: '!vthis-csym' on line 727 in file 'glue.c'
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8720
tmn tmn.db...@mailinator.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice
CC||tmn.db...@mailinator.com
Summary|Assertion failure: |ICE: Assertion failure:
|'!vthis-csym' on line 727 |'!vthis-csym' on line 727
|in file 'glue.c'|in file 'glue.c'
--- Comment #1 from tmn tmn.db...@mailinator.com 2012-11-02 04:27:00 PDT ---
I get this with the following test case:
module b;
void call(alias fun)() {
fun(0);
}
module a;
import b;
class A {
void foo(int c) {
call!(a = c);
}
}
dmd b.d a.d
dmd: glue.c:727: virtual void FuncDeclaration::toObjFile(int): Assertion
`!vthis-csym' failed.
In addition, if I remove the class around the function foo, then I get the ICE
described in issue 2962:
module b;
void call(alias fun)() {
fun(0);
}
module a;
import b;
void foo(int c) {
call!(a = c);
}
dmd b.d a.d
a.d(5): Error: function a.foo compiler error, parameter 'c', bugzilla 2962?
dmd: glue.c:758: virtual void FuncDeclaration::toObjFile(int): Assertion `0'
failed.
(Using DMD64 D Compiler v2.060 on Linux)
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8934] New: Lambda violates DMD assertion
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8934
Summary: Lambda violates DMD assertion
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: dimitri.saba...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Dimitri Sabadie dimitri.saba...@gmail.com 2012-11-02
04:38:54 PDT ---
I have found something interresting with lambdas. Consider this:
string modules[] = [ foo, bar, zoo ];
string line;
/* ... */
/* now line contains something not empty */
if (any!(a = a == line)(modules)) {
/* ... */
}
I get a DMD assertion crash on the if statement:
Assertion failure: '!vthis-csym' on line 727 in file 'glue.c'
Of course, the lambda syntax is, here,
(string a) = a == line
But sometimes a = a == line also works as inference type lambda! I don’t know
why it doesn’t here. Also, this works too:
(string a) { return a == line; }
Is it the old delegate literal syntax?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8934] Lambda violates DMD assertion
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8934 --- Comment #1 from Dimitri Sabadie dimitri.saba...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 04:40:29 PDT --- Just to precise — as the topic name does — DMD fails to say that the error is on the lambda expression in the if statement. Instead it prints internal shit assertions. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8899] Erroneous delegate usage and map template
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8899 --- Comment #1 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2012-11-02 05:04:41 PDT --- - issue 8934 shows same problem -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8934] Lambda violates DMD assertion
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8934 Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ma...@maxim-fomin.ru --- Comment #2 from Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru 2012-11-02 05:03:14 PDT --- Regarding lambdas - it is well-known issue which consists in treating lambda expression as voids: see issue 8899. Regarding internal compiler error - please provide exact code which shows problem. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8935] New: ICE(cod3.c, cod4.c): Returning string literal casted to static array
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8935
Summary: ICE(cod3.c, cod4.c): Returning string literal casted
to static array
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: ice
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: cbkbbej...@mailinator.com
--- Comment #0 from Nick Sabalausky cbkbbej...@mailinator.com 2012-11-02
05:07:39 PDT ---
char[1] foo()
{
return cast(char[1])a;
}
$ dmd test.d
Internal error: ..\ztc\cod3.c 528
Changing to zero-length moves the ICE to cod4.c:
char[0] foo()
{
return cast(char[0]);
}
$ dmd test.d
Internal error: ..\ztc\cod4.c 359
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8929] long.min is a Voldemort literal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8929 --- Comment #3 from David Eckardt david.ecka...@sociomantic.com 2012-11-02 05:16:23 PDT --- Although no surprise, it might be worth noting that mixin(static assert(long.min== ~ long.min.stringof ~ );); causes the signed integer overflow error, too. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 7354] ld: GOT load reloc does not point to a movq instruction
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7354
Shahid govell...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||govell...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Shahid govell...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 05:25:25 PDT ---
__gshared long var;
void main()
{
asm{ mov [var], RAX; }
}
---
This causes the same link error on OSX64
ld: GOT load reloc does not point to a movq instruction in _D7testabi4mainFZv
from testabi.o for architecture x86_64
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 3142] std.loader documentation missing
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3142 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 05:53:46 PDT --- I think this is now superseeded by the core.runtime.loader -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8808] Header generation must recreate folder structure if -Hd is used
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8808 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jaysis...@yahoo.com --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 05:59:22 PDT --- *** Issue 4495 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4495] The -Hd (import file generation directory) option for DMD doesn't work correctly in 2.047.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4495 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 05:59:22 PDT --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 8808 *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6248] HTOD leaves out const when translating C headers
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6248 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 06:04:03 PDT --- We have better (cross-platform) tools for .h conversion, not gonna wait for Walter. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6249] HTOD deletes files without notice
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6249 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 06:03:30 PDT --- I must have been very angry when I filed this. :p Anyway we have better (cross-platform) tools for .h conversion now. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6292] HTOD hides constants behind a comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6292 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 06:04:09 PDT --- We have better (cross-platform) tools for .h conversion, not gonna wait for Walter. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8936 Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@lycus.org --- Comment #1 from Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org 2012-11-02 15:13:50 CET --- I don't have a Windows machine available. Do you know where in druntime this search is being triggered? This is...kind of bad. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8546] std.array.overlap missing from ddoc
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8546 --- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-11-02 07:14:05 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/f7f8a1fc5c9cf2087a4d55b2c6b0a97b83c6cde3 Merge pull request #919 from AndrejMitrovic/Fix8546 [trivial] Fixes Issue 8546 - missing asterisk in ddoc. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8546] std.array.overlap missing from ddoc
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8546 Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@lycus.org --- Comment #2 from Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org 2012-11-02 15:14:32 CET --- Do we close this? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8936] New: Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8936
Summary: Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree
rooted in current directory
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P1
Component: druntime
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: verylonglogin@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-11-02
17:11:54 MSK ---
This is catastrophic Windows druntime issue.
Triggering code:
---
void main()
{
throw new Exception(Ex); // or Error, or any Throwable
// try throw new Exception(Ex); catch { } // same here
}
---
Want something really long? Lunch this on Windows:
---
import std.file;
void main()
{
chdir(`C:\`);
try
// Let's serach the whole C: drive!
throw new Exception(Ex);
catch { }
}
---
Since dmd 2.060.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8936 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 07:18:59 PDT --- My best bet is that new dbghelp.dll code which tries to find dbghelp.dll is causing the search. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8546] std.array.overlap missing from ddoc
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8546 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8937] New: import declaration statement without scope after `if` imports to a parent scope
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8937
Summary: import declaration statement without scope after `if`
imports to a parent scope
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: verylonglogin@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-11-02
17:23:59 MSK ---
---
void main()
{
{
static assert(!__traits(compiles, cos(0)));
if(false)
{
static assert(!__traits(compiles, cos(0)));
import std.math;
static assert( __traits(compiles, cos(0)));
}
static assert(!__traits(compiles, cos(0)));
if(true) // same for `if(false) { } else`
import std.math;
static assert(!__traits(compiles, cos(0))); // fails
static assert(!__traits(compiles, cos(0))); // fails
}
static assert(!__traits(compiles, cos(0)));
}
---
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8936] Throwing results in searching the whole directory tree rooted in current directory
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8936 --- Comment #3 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-11-02 17:33:05 MSK --- Call stack (thanks OllyDbg): --- AddressStack Procedure / arguments 0012E578 7C90D77A Includes ntdll.KiFastSystemCallRet 0012E57C 7C80ED62 ntdll.ZwQueryDirectoryFile 0012E888 7C8138B7 kernel32.FindFirstFileExW 0012EB1C 59C7117B kernel32.FindFirstFileA 0012EB20 0012EE90 FileName = .\D\dmd2.055\html\d\*.* 0012EB24 0012EC4C pFindFileData = 0012EC4C 0012EF9C 59C71636 dbghelp.59C7109F 0012F110 59C717C6 ? dbghelp.59C7149F 0012F15C 59C71839 ? dbghelp.59C716F4 0012F17C 59C7B424 ? dbghelp.FindExecutableImageEx 0012F1C0 59C816F7 ? dbghelp.59C7B2D1 0012F32C 59C820BF dbghelp.59C81652 0012F33C 59C82109 dbghelp.59C82061 0012F37C 59C75332 ? dbghelp.59C820D5 0012F3B0 59C84B93 dbghelp.59C75309 0012F408 59C84CC4 dbghelp.59C84B53 0012F4B4 59C8530F dbghelp.59C84C5E 0012F4DC 59C8356D dbghelp.59C852DF 0012F514 00421AF0 Includes dbghelp.59C8356D 0012FDA4 004219B3 test_d2.00421A0C 0012FDD0 0042178D test_d2.00421974 0012FDDC 004171F4 test_d2.00421778 0012FDEC 0041A546 test_d2.004171E0 0012FDF0 00410CEC test_d2.0041A530 0012FE08 0040B9FD test_d2.00410CC4 0012FE18 004082D4 test_d2.0040B9F0 0012FE20 00402082 test_d2.004082C8 0012FE54 0040823A test_d2.00402010 0012FE68 00407EBC test_d2.00408228 0012FE98 0040827D test_d2.00407E54 0012FEAC 00407EBC test_d2.00408248 0012FEDC 00407E40 test_d2.00407E54 0012FF84 00435311 test_d2.00407BF4 0012FF88 0001 Arg1 = 0001 0012FF8C 009303C4 Arg2 = 009303C4 0012FF90 00930400 Arg3 = 00930400 0012FF94 Arg4 = 0012FFC4 7C817077 Includes test_d2.00435311 --- `FileName` goes through the whole disk. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8938] New: static struct initializer allows to not explicitly initialize members with disabled constructor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8938
Summary: static struct initializer allows to not explicitly
initialize members with disabled constructor
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: verylonglogin@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-11-02
17:46:46 MSK ---
Current behavior:
---
struct S0 { @disable this(); }
struct S { int i; S0 s0; }
static assert(!__traits(compiles, { S0 s; }));
static assert(!__traits(compiles, { S0 s = S0(); }));
static assert( __traits(compiles, { S0 s = S0.init; }));
static assert(!__traits(compiles, {
struct S1 { S0 s0; this(int) { } }
}));
static assert(!__traits(compiles, { S s; }));
static assert( __traits(compiles, { S s = S(5, S0.init); }));
static assert(!__traits(compiles, { S s = S(); })); // assert failure
static assert(!__traits(compiles, { S s = S(5); }));// assert failure
static assert(!__traits(compiles, { S x = { }; })); // assert failure
static assert(!__traits(compiles, { S x = { i:1 }; })); // assert failure
---
It looks inconsistent because this is disabled:
---
struct S1 {
int i;
S0 s0;
// Error: constructor main.S1.this field s0 must be initialized in
constructor
this(int i) { this.i = i; }
}
---
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8939] New: ICE on passing by ref statically initialized const/immutable variable
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8939
Summary: ICE on passing by ref statically initialized
const/immutable variable
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: ice, rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: verylonglogin@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-11-02
17:56:39 MSK ---
---
void f(T)(ref T) { } // same for `auto ref`
const n = 1; // or `immutable`
void main()
{
f(n); // main.d(8): Error: constant 1 is not an lvalue
// And ICE: Assertion failure: '0' on line 1224 in file 'glue.c'
}
---
The bad thing is that it breaks `auto ref` too with same (incorrect now) not
an lvalue error before ICE.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8940] New: Able to modify const/immutable with passing to a templated function by `ref`
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8940
Summary: Able to modify const/immutable with passing to a
templated function by `ref`
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: verylonglogin@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-11-02
18:17:31 MSK ---
---
const int n; // or `immutable`
static this() { n = 3; }
void f(T)(ref int val)
{
assert(val == 3);
++val;
}
static assert(!__traits(compiles, f!void(n))); // fails
---
As a result of the fact `f!void(n)` compiles:
---
void main()
{
assert(n == 3);
f!void(n);
assert(n == 3); // may pass as compiler caches comparison result
assert(n != 4); // may pass but likely will fail
}
---
This also leads to ability to modify const/immutable data accidentally because
of incorrect overload selection:
---
void g(A...)(A args) { }
void g(A...)(ref A args) { assert(0); }
void main()
{
g(1); // ok
g(n); // triggers `assert(0)`
}
---
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8940] Able to modify const/immutable with passing to a templated function by `ref`
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8940 --- Comment #1 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-11-02 18:22:48 MSK --- May be connected with Issue 8939 - ICE on passing by ref statically initialized const/immutable variable -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8939] ICE on passing by ref statically initialized const/immutable variable
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8939 --- Comment #1 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-11-02 18:23:10 MSK --- May be connected with Issue 8940 - Able to modify const/immutable with passing to a templated function by `ref` -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8941] New: Documentation for the Yes struct in Phobos std.typecons appears incorrect
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8941 Summary: Documentation for the Yes struct in Phobos std.typecons appears incorrect Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: p.summerl...@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Peter Summerland p.summerl...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 08:37:57 PDT --- The docs say: Convenience names that allow using e.g. yes!encryption instead of Flag!encryption.yes and no!encryption instead of Flag!encryption.no. I could not get yes!encription to work. But Yes.encryption does work. Should the docs say Yes.encryption? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8942] New: `alias qualifier type` ignores qualifier in foreach over tuple
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8942
Summary: `alias qualifier type` ignores qualifier in
foreach over tuple
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: verylonglogin@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-11-02
18:39:32 MSK ---
Qualifier is ignored in foreach over tuple if there is no parantheses:
---
alias const int A0;
static assert(is(A0 == const int)); // passes
void main()
{
alias const int A1;
static assert(is(A1 == const int)); // passes
static struct S { int i; }
foreach(Unused; typeof(S.tupleof))
{
alias const(int) A2_;
static assert(is(A2_ == const int)); // also passes
alias const int A2;
static assert(is(A2 == const int)); // fails
// Error: static assert (is(int == const(int))) is false
}
}
---
As always, such (unexpected) template bugs are hard to figure out.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8943] New: Cannot get parent of an overload
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8943
Summary: Cannot get parent of an overload
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: samu...@voliacable.com
--- Comment #0 from Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com 2012-11-02 09:08:42
PDT ---
struct S
{
void foo();
}
// Just to be able to alias __traits
template AliasTuple(A...)
{
alias A AliasTuple;
}
alias AliasTuple!(__traits(getOverloads, S, foo)) Overloads;
alias AliasTuple!(__traits(parent, Overloads[0])) P; // fail
static assert(is(P[0] == S));
Error: argument foo has no parent
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8944] New: Loosing const from shared const type when unqualifying in foreach over tuple
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8944
Summary: Loosing const from shared const type when unqualifying
in foreach over tuple
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: verylonglogin@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-11-02
20:34:54 MSK ---
---
template TypeTuple(TList...)
{ alias TList TypeTuple; }
void main()
{
foreach(T; TypeTuple!(shared void*, const shared void*))
{
static if (is(T U == shared const U)) alias U TU;
else static if (is(T U == shared U)) alias U TU;
else static assert(0);
pragma(msg, T: , T, \nTU: , TU, \n);
static if(is(T P == P*))
static if(is(TU PU == PU*))
static assert(is(P == PU)); // fails on second iteration
T t;
bool b = is(typeof(cast(TU*) t = null)); // comment to hide a bug
}
}
---
Output:
---
T: shared(void*)
TU: shared(void)*
T: shared(const(void*))
TU: shared(void)*
main.d(16): Error: static assert (is(shared(const(void)) == shared(void))) is
false
---
Second `TU` should be `shared(const(void))*`.
As always, such (unexpected) template bugs are hard to figure out.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8945] New: Can't call static struct initializer or constructor without qualifier for templated inner struct
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8945
Summary: Can't call static struct initializer or constructor
without qualifier for templated inner struct
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: verylonglogin@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-11-02
21:01:28 MSK ---
---
struct S // or `class`, or `union`
{
struct S0(T) { int i; }
struct S1(T) { this(int){} }
}
void main()
{
auto cs01 = const S.S0!int(); // ok
auto cs02 = const S.S0!int(1); // ok
auto cs1 = const S.S1!int(1); // ok
auto s01 = S.S0!int(); // Error: struct S0 does not overload ()
auto s02 = S.S0!int(1); // Error: struct S0 does not overload ()
auto s1 = S.S1!int(1); // Error: struct S1 does not overload ()
}
---
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 198] DDoc: superclass/interface decl expansion
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=198 Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@me.com --- Comment #2 from Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com 2012-11-02 11:03:34 PDT --- I think this would be very useful. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8945] Can't call static struct initializer or constructor without qualifier for templated inner struct
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8945 Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor --- Comment #1 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-11-02 21:04:45 MSK --- An easy workaround: --- auto s01 = S.S0!int.init; auto s02 = cast(S.S0!int) 1; auto s1 = cast(S.S1!int) 1; --- -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8946] New: « any » function does not what it should do
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8946 Summary: « any » function does not what it should do Product: D Version: future Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: Phobos AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com ReportedBy: dimitri.saba...@gmail.com --- Comment #0 from Dimitri Sabadie dimitri.saba...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 11:07:46 PDT --- The any function calls find, which is really weird implemented because it returns a subrange, doing (re)allocation(s) on the fly. I think it’s way too much for just applying a predicate on a range. That’s why I have rewritten any as it would be (a simple loop and apply the predicate), and I’d propose a patch here for the std one. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8947] New: redBlackTree() of fixed size arrays
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8947
Summary: redBlackTree() of fixed size arrays
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: accepts-invalid, rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #0 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-11-02 12:40:52 PDT ---
I think redBlackTree() has problems with fixed size arrays:
import std.container: redBlackTree, RedBlackTree;
void main() {
int[2] a;
auto t1 = new RedBlackTree!(typeof(a));
t1.stableInsert(a); // OK
auto t2 = redBlackTree(a);
t2.stableInsert(a); // Error
t2.stableInsert(1); // No error, but it's wrong
}
DMD 2.061alpha gives:
test.d(7): Error: template
std.container.RedBlackTree!(int).RedBlackTree.stableInsert does not match any
function template declaration
...\dmd2\src\phobos\std\container.d(5834): Error: template
std.container.RedBlackTree!(int).RedBlackTree.stableInsert cannot deduce
template function from argument types !()(int[2u])
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8948] New: Make error message more readable when assigning function pointers
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8948
Summary: Make error message more readable when assigning
function pointers
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: pull
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
ReportedBy: andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comment #0 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-11-02
13:22:39 PDT ---
void main()
{
void function() a;
void function(int) b;
b = a;
}
Before:
test.d(7): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (a) of type void
function(int, float, string) to void function(float, int, string)
After:
test.d(7): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (a) of type
void function(int, float, string)
to
void function(float, int, string)
This will make it easier to figure out why the types don't match.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 4090] No foreach type inference with const, ref etc modifiers
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4090 --- Comment #8 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 20:26:26 PDT --- Posted an additional pull request: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1249 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8945] Can't call static struct initializer or constructor without qualifier for templated inner struct
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8945 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 21:04:09 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1250 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8949] New: [CTFE] Internal Compiler Error
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8949
Summary: [CTFE] Internal Compiler Error
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: nob...@puremagic.com
ReportedBy: zan77...@nifty.com
--- Comment #0 from SHOO zan77...@nifty.com 2012-11-02 21:07:40 PDT ---
This code doesn't work:
string test()
{
import std.csv;
static struct Layout { string a, b; }
static struct MapData { string[string] map; }
MapData md;
foreach (data; csvReader!Layout(a,))
{
md.map[data.a] = data.b;
}
return md.map.get(b, null);
}
void main()
{
//import std.stdio;
//writeln(test()); // - OK
pragma(msg, test()); // - NG
}
Result:
main.d(9): Error: Internal Compiler Error: CTFE literal Layout(['a'],null).b
Assertion failure: '0' on line 353 in file 'ctfeexpr.c'
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6214] Don't influence foreach iteration on range
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6214
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 21:12:30 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
import std.stdio;
void main() {
foreach (i; 0 .. 10) {
i += 1;
write(i, );
}
}
The output:
1 3 5 7 9
In my opinion this is a bit bug-prone because in real code there is some risk
of modifying the iteration variable i by mistake. (Note: here I am not
talking about D for() loops. They are OK, their semantics is transparent
enough. foreach() loops are less transparent and they *look* higher level than
for() loops). I'd like the iteration variable to act as being a copy of the
true loop variable as in Python. If this is a bit bad for foreach performance,
then I'd like the compiler to forbid the mutation of the foreach iteration
variable inside the foreach body.
This is now progressing by fixing bug 6652. So I'll mark this as a dup of it.
Currently you can't solve the problem adding a const(int) to the iteration
variable:
import std.stdio;
void main() {
foreach (const(int) i; 0 .. 10) { // line 3
write(i, );
}
}
DMD 2.053 gives:
test.d(3): Error: variable test.main.i cannot modify const
This is a dup of bug 4090, and it is mostly fixed in 2.061head.
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 6652 ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 6652] foreach parameter with number range is always ref
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6652 --- Comment #23 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 21:12:30 PDT --- *** Issue 6214 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
[Issue 8943] Cannot get parent of an overload
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8943 Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, wrong-code --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-11-02 21:20:30 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1251 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
