http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4540
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-01-10 23:54:43 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/8ab6ab22b7e7d160732d72c71e9953e750f6b1b
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5140
--- Comment #6 from Rob T 2013-01-10 23:24:01 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> See a better explanations and some examples of __function:
> http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Anonymous_recursion
>
I really would love to have the ability to perform
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9281
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9281
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara 2013-01-10 22:52:17 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Yes my fault, I try to simplify too much. Here is more detailed description
>
> Code which works on 2.060 and don`t compile on 2.061
>
[snip]
The reason wh
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9293
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9218
--- Comment #10 from Kenji Hara 2013-01-10 22:08:42 PST
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Ok, that workabout is not quite complete (perhaps this is a different bug
> now?). While it solves the code in the original comment, this code doesn't
> wor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9293
Summary: enum struct with StructInitializer reports weird error
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: n
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9249
--- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-01-10
20:58:23 PST ---
I've tried a version as old as 2.032 which has the same behavior. It's odd this
wasn't picked up before.
What I think should happen is opCast should be tried first, and if it can
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9249
Puneet Goel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Defining opCast disables|Defining opCast disables
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9249
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comme
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8628
Ellery Newcomer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5140
--- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-01-10 20:23:21 PST ---
If __FUNCTION__ gets approved, then probably the probability of __function
getting approved decreases. And I don't care for __FUNCTION__.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.p
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5140
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8628
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comme
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8807
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comme
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9047
--- Comment #6 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-01-10
15:07:59 PST ---
*** Issue 8354 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mai
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8354
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7662
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8157
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6227
--- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-01-10
14:59:00 PST ---
*** Issue 8157 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mai
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4286
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5507
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
Severi
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9292
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuc...@ubuntu.com
--- Comment #1 from I
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5176
--- Comment #27 from Walter Bright 2013-01-10
12:08:12 PST ---
> Oh yes it does:
You can test this with a far simpler program. Just write a function that calls
itself and run it under the debugger.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5176
--- Comment #26 from Walter Bright 2013-01-10
12:03:50 PST ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> How large are the guard pages on each OS?
Usually 4k. But the function prologs, when creating a stack frame larger than
4k, will do "probes" for each 4
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5176
--- Comment #25 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2013-01-10 11:46:07 PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Windows inserts a "guard page" that is hardware protected beyond the end of
> the
> allocated stack. A stack overflow runs into that guard page,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8727
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comme
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9292
Summary: hasNestedArgs wrong result for nested template literal
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8941
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8742
--- Comment #2 from David Eckardt 2013-01-10
10:43:28 PST ---
It sounds plausible to me that the code is invalid due to wrong nesting; I
didn't notice that, sorry.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9287
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comme
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9291
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5176
--- Comment #24 from Jacob Carlborg 2013-01-10 10:14:47 PST ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> How large are the guard pages on each OS?
>
> We should either restrict object size to a reasonable maximum, or insert
> runtime checks at least in @sa
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9291
Summary: [ICE] throwing undefined identifier with nothrow
crashes dmd
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5507
Brad Anderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@gnuk.net
--- Comment #2 from Brad
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857
--- Comment #88 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2013-01-10
09:14:02 PST ---
@Walter: would you preapprove this?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5176
--- Comment #23 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2013-01-10
09:12:28 PST ---
Oh there's also a confusion. The problem is not with the stack, it's with
accessing fields through null pointers. Getting back to the original example:
struct S {
char r
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5176
--- Comment #22 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2013-01-10
09:08:49 PST ---
How large are the guard pages on each OS?
We should either restrict object size to a reasonable maximum, or insert
runtime checks at least in @safe mode when accessing field
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9281
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Kozak 2013-01-10 07:42:45 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Did this really work with 2.060? I cannot reproduce the "works 2.060".
>
> Column.opAssign is an immutable member function, then we can call it from
> immu
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6057
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-01-10
07:37:02 PST ---
*** Issue has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mai
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8742
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comme
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8456
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8586
--- Comment #5 from jens.k.muel...@gmx.de 2013-01-10 07:32:51 PST ---
Me neither. Tested on Linux.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6107
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comme
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6538
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comme
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9289
--- Comment #5 from Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-10 07:03:04 PST ---
Well I see the second example from Kenji doesn't print any warnings, that's
certainly a problem. But the first example works just fine, it compiles issuing
a warning. That is wh
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9289
--- Comment #4 from Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-10 06:56:59 PST ---
I still don't understand why is it a good idea to treat deprecated language
features differently from deprecated symbols. Deprecated language features get
a warning but you only
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6743
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9281
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2013-01-10 06:22:48 PST ---
Did this really work with 2.060? I cannot reproduce the "works 2.060".
Column.opAssign is an immutable member function, then we can call it from
immutable object test1, but cannot call
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7522
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3865
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comment #
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7842
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8586
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9288
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-01-10 05:02:56 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/f6f57530a64c045c434a473efcd6492d6
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8078
Alex R�nne Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8078
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-01-10 05:02:00 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/8592a34d4b3f958af2bdadc30f158d67e
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9289
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9289
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2013
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9289
Leandro Lucarella changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leandro.lucarella@sociomant
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5176
--- Comment #21 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-01-10 01:46:38 PST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Windows inserts a "guard page" that is hardware protected beyond the end of
> the
> allocated stack. A stack overflow runs into that guard page,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9290
Summary: Ability to modify immutable as static array assignment
is allowed when it must not
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5176
--- Comment #20 from Don 2013-01-10 01:14:30 PST ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> (In reply to comment #17)
> > Windows inserts a "guard page" that is hardware protected beyond the end of
> > the
> > allocated stack. A stack overflow runs into
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8354
Puneet Goel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7019
Denis Shelomovskij changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||verylonglogin@gmail.com
--- C
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7152
Denis Shelomovskij changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7152
--- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-01-10 00:46:15 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/e418d1e1072d4bf7254e759cdc0ad975d45ceed
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6857
--- Comment #87 from deadalnix 2013-01-10 00:41:57 PST ---
(In reply to comment #85)
> I've had the opportunity to discuss the matter with Bertrand Meyer himself and
> with a graduate student of his. Bertrand didn't have a defined answer offhan
68 matches
Mail list logo