Re: [Issue 8530] New: Float types default initializers doesn't work in class
On 8/10/2012 2:30 AM, Daniel Kozak wrote: Problematic code: Replying to bug reports in the newsgroup generally means your reply will be overlooked. Please reply on bugzilla.
Re: OPTLINK : Error 118: Filename Expected
On 8/8/2012 4:11 PM, anon wrote: Yet another obscure error message that makes no sense. I suspect it's the ( ) you have in the file names.
Re: Procedure entry point RtlCaptureContext could not be located
On 5/11/2012 12:39 PM, Steve Greene wrote:
Here is the complete message:
The procedure entry point RtlCaptureContext could not be located in the
dynamic link library KERNEL32.dll
Here is my program:
int main(char[][] args) {
return(0);
}
That's it. That's the whole thing. I recently read about the D language when I
was looking up some information for a C program I'm writing, and it looks very
interesting (I also use Perl heavily, and I liked some of the ideas about D;
seems kind of like C and some really good aspects of Perl in one language) so
I wanted to try it out, so I downloaded it. Unfortunately, apparently I can't
use it.
I'm on a Windows 2000 Professional SP4 machine.
1. This newsgroup is just an echo for bugzilla, bug reports should go to
bugzilla instead. Few read this group.
2. dmd no longer supports Win2K. It was necessary to drop support for it in
order to rely on numerous bug fixes in Windows since then.
Re: [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.
On 5/6/2012 2:19 AM, d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote: That is not this complicated. you need a final function that check the in contract, then call another virtual function that actually execute the function body and the out contract. With such a configuration, the in contract is checked and only then the virtual dispatch is done. It's not that simple. Several considerations have to be met: 1. Because of struct construction/destruction, you really only want to construct the parameter list *once*, but you're calling two functions with the same parameter list. 2. Variadic functions mean that one function cannot forward to another one using standard functions. (Perhaps a dirty magic thunk can work.) 3. The presence or absence of contracts must not change the ABI of the function. 4. The virtual table must be unchanged. 5. It's not so practical to jump into the middle of another function - things just aren't designed that way. 6. The caller now has to be aware of contracts in the called function, this was never necessary before.
Re: [Issue 6857] Precondition contract checks should be statically bound.
Please reply on bugzilla, replying here is most likely to be overlooked.
Re: opDispatch returning this not working in a hierarchy
On 2/1/2012 8:00 PM, Daniel L. Alves wrote: I don't know if this is really a bug or some gotcha of the language that I don't get. I'm sorry if it happens to be the later. This n.g. is mainly for bugzilla notifications. Questions like this should go into the digitalmars.D.learn n.g. But to answer your question, printValue is a template, and templates are not virtual. Also, DispatchBase.opDispatch knows nothing about DispatchDerived.
bugzilla hooked to github
Some of you may have noticed that Brad Roberts has configured bugzilla so it gets notifications from github when fixes get pushed. This makes things easier and more consistent.
Re: GC.collect() and GC.minimize() not releasing memory
Simen kjaeraas wrote: Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com wrote: On 24/12/2010 06:13, torhu wrote: This newsgroup is just for automated use by Bugzilla. snip Where is the official statement of this? Likely there is no hard official statement. However, http://www.digitalmars.com/NewsGroup.html states that it is for Bug reports for D compiler and library. Those use Bugzilla for bug reports, and free-floating posts in the newsgroup are not tracked like those in Bugzilla, giving them a lot less value. That's right. It's just not useful to post free floating posts here. Bug reports should go in bugzilla.
Re: [Issue 3192] Segfault(iasm.c) asm in a anonymous delegate
I'll put some comments in.
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
Thanks for taking care of this, Brad!
Re: bugzilla email
Brad Roberts wrote: Who found it useful and/or desirable? I think it's useful and desirable, as otherwise there'll be two separate threads about each bug.
Re: Russian and other national languages support
zorran wrote: Russian language not working in comments and strings by default with ANSI coding (code page) Compiler write error - invalid UTF-8 sequence D source code is expected to be in Unicode format (like UTF-8). Modern editors can be set to generate this format instead of using code pages. Having the source code in Unicode ensures global portability of the source code. If the code is written in one code page, then compiled or displayed with a different code page, the result is garbage.
