[Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat

2012-10-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 Alex R�nne Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat

2012-10-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 --- Comment #14 from Iain Buclaw 2012-10-10 00:09:13 PDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Can we close this? I do believe so yes. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this ma

[Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat

2012-10-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 Alex R�nne Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@lycus.org --- Comment #13 f

[Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat

2012-07-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 d...@dawgfoto.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@dawgfoto.de --- Comment #12 fro

[Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat

2012-07-25 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 --- Comment #11 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-25 20:46:01 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/commit/ccaa0ef2cc6a42f6d03d8072de372

[Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat

2012-06-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 --- Comment #10 from jfanati...@gmx.at 2012-06-30 11:15:15 PDT --- Fixed. Pull request: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/257 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are r

[Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat

2012-04-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 jfanati...@gmx.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jfanati...@gmx.at --- Comment #9 fr

[Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat

2011-04-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 --- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw 2011-04-17 22:24:37 PDT --- struct_stat64 in std.file is still present and should be removed. :o) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mai

[Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat

2011-02-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 --- Comment #7 from Sohgo Takeuchi 2011-02-01 03:14:10 PST --- As walter says, since lstat64 is not defined for FreeBSD, I have reported at http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5512 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/iss

[Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat

2011-02-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #

[Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat

2011-01-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #859 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat

2011-01-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 Sohgo Takeuchi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||so...@sohgo.dyndns.org --- Comment #4

[Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat

2011-01-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw 2011-01-03 06:47:56 PST --- Created an attachment (id=859) patch for 5206 Patch against my tree. Updates stat_t for version(linux), adds definition of __WORDSIZE (needs review, probably better to define it on a

[Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat

2010-12-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuc...@ubuntu.com --- Comment #2 from I

[Issue 5206] stat_t is not the same as struct stat

2010-11-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206 --- Comment #1 from Jesse Phillips 2010-11-11 21:48:11 PST --- I did try to compare the Structures, and only one thing came out as being different (after I discovered __USE_FILE_OFFSET64 was supposed to always be set). The struct has a if(fals