http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3544
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3551
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3478
--- Comment #5 from Walter Bright 2009-11-30
02:31:19 PST ---
I'll change the spec to say that it's illegal to have a void return expression
with no side effects.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3420
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3420
Vladimir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3481
--- Comment #10 from Sobirari Muhomori 2009-11-30
07:01:11 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I'm sorry to bring the bike shed discussion here, but I would like to consider
> ** exponentiation. The reason is that writing ^^ for people with key
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3559
Summary: DMD 1.048+ fails to take function pointer from
overloaded member functions
Product: D
Version: 1.051
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Se
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3560
Summary: foreach on closure corrupted
Product: D
Version: 2.036
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3561
Summary: math.abs signature accepts static arrays, but errors
internally.
Product: D
Version: 2.036
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywor
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3420
Leandro Lucarella changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||llu...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 fr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3420
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir 2009-11-30 14:01:19 PST
---
Ah, I see. This should be clarified in the documentation... Also, doesn't
anyone think that this could be too constricting? What if you have a directory
tree of data to import? Not to me
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3481
Leandro Lucarella changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||llu...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11 f
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3420
--- Comment #5 from Leandro Lucarella 2009-11-30 14:10:12
PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Ah, I see. This should be clarified in the documentation... Also, doesn't
> anyone think that this could be too constricting?
I do.
Maybe this can b
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3521
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3562
Summary: Static Array ops create duplicate method definitions
Product: D
Version: 2.036
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: link-failure
Sever
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3420
--- Comment #6 from Leandro Lucarella 2009-11-30 16:44:19
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=520)
Proof of concept patch
Here it is a proof of concept patch to allow directories in string imports
*safely*. The check is done as I said in commen
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3420
Leandro Lucarella changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Severity|regression
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3420
--- Comment #7 from Leandro Lucarella 2009-11-30 16:51:47
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=521)
Test cases
Here are some test cases, they are packed in a tarball because it includes a
directory structure.
Tests are in the directory d2, and
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3420
--- Comment #8 from Leandro Lucarella 2009-11-30 16:54:59
PST ---
BTW, the patch I consider the patch only a proof of concept because it lacks
Windows support (and testing on other unixes). Besides that, I think the patch
is not bad =)
--
Co
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3558
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #1 from Don 2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3558
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3558
--- Comment #3 from Walter Bright 2009-11-30
17:39:13 PST ---
Oops, I meant 3521 was fixed!
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3521
--- Comment #4 from Walter Bright 2009-11-30
17:39:56 PST ---
Fixed changeset 272.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2478
David Simcha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2504
--- Comment #2 from David Simcha 2009-11-30 20:36:16 PST ---
No, this is because, on the second run, the program has already reserved a
bunch of memory from the OS, so the GC doesn't run as often.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.co
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2504
--- Comment #3 from ZY Zhou 2009-11-30 21:24:04 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> No, this is because, on the second run, the program has already reserved a
> bunch of memory from the OS, so the GC doesn't run as often.
try this:
import std.
26 matches
Mail list logo
