[Issue 4363] std.algorithm.Until is not a forward range

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4363 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from yebb

[Issue 4372] New: type of enumerator values reduced to base type in debug info

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4372 Summary: type of enumerator values reduced to base type in debug info Product: D Version: D1 & D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords

[Issue 4314] Expression array1 && array2 doesn't compile

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4314 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 2451] Adding structs that use opAssign or postblit to an AA is broken

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2451 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.

[Issue 4372] type of enumerator values reduced to base type in debug info

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4372 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Schuetze 2010-06-23 00:18:10 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=674) Recoverer enumerator type for debug info The type information is lost in toCType, but as the code generator probably relies on working with the bas

[Issue 4373] New: Importing class with 'auto foo()' causes DMD Bus error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4373 Summary: Importing class with 'auto foo()' causes DMD Bus error Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P

[Issue 4373] Importing class with 'auto foo()' causes DMD Bus error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4373 Lars T. Kyllingstad changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@kyllingen.net OS

[Issue 4374] New: Required do-while ending semicolon

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4374 Summary: Required do-while ending semicolon Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal Pr

[Issue 4375] New: Require explicit braces when 'else' is ambiguous

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4375 Summary: Require explicit braces when 'else' is ambiguous Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 4368] Fork() on OS X 2.047 results in a core.thread.ThreadException

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4368 Heywood Floyd changed: What|Removed |Added CC||soul...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from

[Issue 3839] std.range.iota cannot take 'long' arguments.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3839 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 4375] Require explicit braces when 'else' is ambiguous

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4375 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmail.com --- Comment #

[Issue 4375] Require explicit braces when 'else' is ambiguous

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4375 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-06-23 10:23:48 PDT --- Answer to Comment 1: >I don't believe that it cares at all about indentation at this point.< Right, with this code GCC generates the same warning/error: void foo() {} void

[Issue 4376] New: Cannot build static binaries; running dmd with flag -L-static fails to compile

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4376 Summary: Cannot build static binaries; running dmd with flag -L-static fails to compile Product: D Version: 2.041 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 4375] Require explicit braces when 'else' is ambiguous

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4375 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis 2010-06-23 11:41:41 PDT --- Ah, okay. I guess that that could be detected without regards to indentation. As such, it probably wouldn't require huge changes to implement, and I don't see a particular proble

[Issue 4363] Some std.algorithm ranges are not forward ranges (but should be)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4363 --- Comment #2 from Philippe Sigaud 2010-06-23 21:43:43 CEST --- (In reply to comment #1) Yeah, I meant to scan std.algo but one of my daughters got sick and... well. You could list other ranges that have the same problem, but in this case I

[Issue 4377] New: Support __gshared for easier D 2 compatibility

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4377 Summary: Support __gshared for easier D 2 compatibility Product: D Version: D1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 4378] New: Array Literals as Default Field Initializers Shared Across Instances.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4378 Summary: Array Literals as Default Field Initializers Shared Across Instances. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Seve

[Issue 4378] Array Literals as Default Field Initializers Shared Across Instances.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4378 Jonathan M Davis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdavisp...@gmail.com --- Comment #

[Issue 4378] Array Literals as Default Field Initializers Shared Across Instances.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4378 --- Comment #2 from David Simcha 2010-06-23 17:45:44 PDT --- Yeah, that's just a typo. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 4378] Array Literals as Default Field Initializers Shared Across Instances.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4378 --- Comment #3 from David Simcha 2010-06-23 17:46:59 PDT --- Forgot to mention, this also applies to classes, not just structs. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Issue 978] std.utf's toUTF* functions accept some invalid and reject some valid UTF

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=978 Shin Fujishiro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 4379] New: DMD chokes on large nested loop over tuple.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4379 Summary: DMD chokes on large nested loop over tuple. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: no

[Issue 4379] DMD chokes on large nested loop over tuple.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4379 --- Comment #1 from David Simcha 2010-06-23 19:57:24 PDT --- Actually, this appears to be related to the total size of the loop body being generated at compile time. Nesting has nothing to do with it. The cutoff appears to be (of all numbers)

[Issue 4260] windows & basename

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4260 Shin Fujishiro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 3937] os.path.dirname fails on absolute path

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3937 Shin Fujishiro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 4363] Some phobos ranges are not forward ranges (but should be)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4363 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Some std.algorithm ranges |Some phobos ranges are not

[Issue 4363] Some phobos ranges are not forward ranges (but should be)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4363 --- Comment #4 from yebblies 2010-06-23 22:18:24 PDT --- Changed the title to reflect that this report covers all of phobos, not just std.algorithm. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are