date:20101114

[Issue 3827] automatic joining of adjacent strings is bad

2010-11-14 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827 --- Comment #16 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-11-13 23:58:35 PST --- Sorry, missed out a line: if (e1-op == TOKcat (e2-op == TOKstring || e2-op == TOKnull) (((CatExp *)e1)-e2-op == TOKstring || ((CatExp *)e1)-e2-op ==

[Issue 5164] Error without line number using is (T...)

2010-11-14 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5164 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Compiler optimization breaks multi-threaded code

2010-11-14 Thread Michal Minich

There is one question on SO which seems like a serious problem for atomic ops. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4165149/compiler-optimization-breaks- multi-threaded-code in short: shared uint cnt; void atomicInc ( ) { uint o; while ( !cas( cnt, o, o + 1 ) ) o = cnt; } is compile with dmd

Re: Compiler optimization breaks multi-threaded code

2010-11-14 Thread Jonathan M Davis

On Sunday 14 November 2010 01:04:46 Michal Minich wrote: There is one question on SO which seems like a serious problem for atomic ops. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4165149/compiler-optimization-breaks- multi-threaded-code in short: shared uint cnt; void atomicInc ( ) { uint o;

[Issue 3516] Destructor not called on temporaries

2010-11-14 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3516 Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 5216] New: /+ parsed incorrectly in comments

2010-11-14 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5216 Summary: /+ parsed incorrectly in comments Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 4712] Issue of destructor for temporary instance of structs

2010-11-14 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4712 SHOO zan77...@nifty.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 5195] Forward references ignore const

2010-11-14 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5195 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 5125] Optional function purity/nothrowness

2010-11-14 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5125 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-14 11:27:06 PST --- Another idea: http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.Darticle_id=122087 -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 5217] Permit static+abstract

2010-11-14 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5217 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC

2010-11-14 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463 --- Comment #81 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-11-14 18:06:05 PST --- I obsoleted all the patches because they were outdated (too old dmd/Tango versions). I don't think it's very efficient to make new patches and post them here (I mean, there are

[Issue 3463] Integrate Precise Heap Scanning Into the GC

2010-11-14 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463 --- Comment #82 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2010-11-14 19:17:59 PST --- Maybe you should try with LDC's or GDC's issues trackers, as this is an implementation detail maybe it gets better reception there (but it would be hard to get