http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2095
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2095
--- Comment #26 from Jason House 2010-11-27
06:24:58 PST ---
If derived[] is implicitly converted to const(base)[], what happens when I
append another bade object to the array? Should it implicitly convert to
const(base[])?
--
Configure issu
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2095
--- Comment #27 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2010-11-27
06:32:03 PST ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> If derived[] is implicitly converted to const(base)[], what happens when I
> append another bade object to the array? Should it implicitly convert
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2095
--- Comment #28 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2010-11-27
10:10:58 PST ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > If derived[] is implicitly converted to const(base)[], what happens when I
> > append another bade object to the arr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4321
ibrahim YANIKLAR changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|nob...@puremagic.com|bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Commen
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5281
Summary: Equality among arrays of Bigints
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Pho
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2590
--- Comment #8 from Max Samukha 2010-11-27 12:03:42
PST ---
Though D is going to deprecate new/delete operators, it is worth noting that
the rule under discussion was adopted by C++ 15 years ago.
>From "Counting Objects in C++" article by Sco
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2590
--- Comment #9 from Max Samukha 2010-11-27 12:06:43
PST ---
A better formatted text: http://www.drdobbs.com/cpp/184403484
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail becau
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2095
--- Comment #29 from Jason House 2010-11-27
12:08:04 PST ---
Doesn't the following make x an lvalue?
const(base)[] x = derived_array;
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving th
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2095
--- Comment #30 from Stewart Gordon 2010-11-27 12:20:15 PST ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> Doesn't the following make x an lvalue?
>
> const(base)[] x = derived_array;
It does ... but appending to x won't alter derived_array. There was, how
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2656
--- Comment #15 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-27 14:25:07 PST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Let's give it a hope. Facts and reason do have to carry some weight. I'll
> commit octal to Phobos.
Even MISRA C disallows octal constants. They
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2656
Unknown W. Brackets changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bug...@unknownbrackets.org
--- C
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5282
Summary: Use memcmp or other appropriate optimizations for
array comparison where possible
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: N
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5283
Summary: Increase granularity of unit tests so that all
unittest blocks in a module run even after another
block fails
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Oth
14 matches
Mail list logo