http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5931
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kenn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5932
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5907
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1330
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5760
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5867
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4865
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kenn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4865
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4040
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||samu...@voliacable.com
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5933
Summary: Cannot retrieve the return type of an auto-return
member function
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5891
--- Comment #3 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-05-06 02:21:58 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Of course the DMD bug should be fixed but Iota is too important to fail, so
this specific case has been worked around:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |regression
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
--- Comment #2 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-05-06 04:09:57 PDT ---
This is a pseudo-regression: it was never doing what it was supposed to. The
test case happened to give the correct results on a previous version, but only
because one
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5810
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5934
Summary: Finite recursive templates are not allowed
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5935
Summary: Non-tuple iteration with std.range.zip
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: patch
Severity: enhancement
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5934
--- Comment #1 from Maksim Zholudev maxim...@gmail.com 2011-05-06 07:55:47
PDT ---
The following code works, but such workarounds are annoying:
--
struct Foo
{
auto opUnary(string op)()
if(op == -)
{
return
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3869
Maksim Zholudev maxim...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maxim...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5934
Maksim Zholudev maxim...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5936
Summary: DMD Segfault when forward-referencing pure auto-return
member function with parameter.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4968
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-05-06 09:21:13 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=964)
test patch
This patch only fix comment#1 case, but not support more cases (array,
function, delegate, etc.)
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5935
kenn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kenn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5409
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-05-06 10:14:02 PDT ---
Don seems to agree in catching this bug statically:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.Darticle_id=135741
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5930
Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5935
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
--- Comment #2 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-05-06 11:21:47 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I'll take care of core.demangle. core.sys.* and core.stdc.* are interfaces
for
C libraries and I'd expect the user to refer to the documentation for
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5935
--- Comment #4 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-05-06 11:26:58 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I'm worried about this development. Before long we could get to the point
where
a lot of ranges get bloated to support two iteration methods because
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@me.com
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5931
Christopher the Magnificent ultimatemacfana...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|keyword new insists on
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5931
--- Comment #4 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-05-06 12:47:28 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
*Shouldn't* post-blit be invokable by calling File(file)? Wouldn't this be
a
desirable behavior?
Sorry, got distracted by the 'this.file = new
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5931
--- Comment #5 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-05-06 12:48:43 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
[snip]
At the line above marked DOESN'T WORK, the compiler refuses to allocate a
new
default-initialized File struct.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5937
Summary: Problem with map!delegate(iota(floating point))
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5937
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-05-06 15:18:27 PDT ---
A better example for the second (bar) case, the problem seems in iota():
import std.range, std.algorithm;
void main() {
auto range2a = iota(1, 5, 1);
int
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5490
--- Comment #12 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2011-05-06 16:10:49 PDT
---
GCC-4.6 offers two new warning switches to catch redundant code:
-Wunused-but-set-parameter and -Wunused-but-set-variable
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4968
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #964 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5938
Summary: ICE ztc\symbol.c 1043
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: regression
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5939
Summary: Cannot copy std.algorithm.map
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: regression
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5940
Summary: Cannot create arrays of std.algorithm.map
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
39 matches
Mail list logo