http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6296
--- Comment #18 from Don 2011-09-16 03:02:04 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Still in dmd-1.x branch (tested after 23846ac and fe308a1).
> ---
> void f(A)(A) { }
> bool b = is(typeof( f(x) ));
> ---
Aargh, it was 6650 which was fixed, no
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3731
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara 2011-09-16 03:24:37 PDT ---
I think issue 3731 is same as issue 5080, and the yebblies patch is a bit
better than mine.
See also Don and Steven's comments in 5080.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1824
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #11 from Kenji Hara 20
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4909
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-16 04:49:47 PDT ---
See also:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=144557
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?ta
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1997
--- Comment #2 from Simen Kjaeraas 2011-09-16 08:17:12
PDT ---
It is worth noting here that the workaround is to use a free function:
struct Foo( T ) {
T data;
this( T value ) {
data = value;
}
}
Foo!T foo( T )( T value )
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4256
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Simen
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4961
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4909
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4909
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-16 09:58:00 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Regarding naming, searching google etc. for schwartz sort yields relevant
> results whereas key sort does not.
Schwartz sort is a common name and
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4909
--- Comment #4 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2011-09-16
10:20:10 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
>
> > Regarding naming, searching google etc. for schwartz sort yields relevant
> > results whereas key sort does not.
>
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6681
Summary: bogus duplicate union initialization or overlapping
initialization errors
Product: D
Version: D1 & D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4909
--- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-16 10:49:07 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (That you unsubtly insert a typo, thus
> underlining how you can't remember the right spelling?)
I have not done that on purpose, I am sorry.
Bu
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6275
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 201
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6275
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6682
Summary: Template function that has lazy parameter does not
inferred as pure
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: re
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6682
Kenji Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 201
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6683
Summary: Skipping declaration with goto resulted in nonsense
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6683
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simen.kja...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6683
--- Comment #2 from Adam D. Ruppe 2011-09-16
17:38:52 PDT ---
Is that saying "bugs in the compiler don't override the spec" or "goto over
initializations at your own risk"?
If it's the latter, this isn't a bug at all. (I can see how the compi
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6683
--- Comment #3 from Simen Kjaeraas 2011-09-16 17:47:46
PDT ---
It's the latter. Not only do you run the risk of your variables being garbage,
but your code might not compile on a future compiler. (not that this has ever
*not* been a problem wi
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6338
Jerry Quinn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jlqu...@optonline.net
--- Comment #2 fro
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6674
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6352
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3180
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Severity|normal
24 matches
Mail list logo
