http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4082
--- Comment #2 from Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de 2012-08-15 01:06:15 PDT ---
Since it all applies to FuncDeclaration::semantic3(...), I'll add this case:
void b(Test t) nothrow {
}
struct Test {
~this() {
throw new
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4082
--- Comment #3 from Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de 2012-08-15 02:12:57 PDT ---
It also happens when I add a switch statement and the goto is a 'goto case
...'. It seems the BEgoto flag has a viral effect. I'll try to fix it.
int x;
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4082
--- Comment #4 from Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de 2012-08-15 03:05:26 PDT ---
Ok I think I have fixed it. The original case was due to try-finally-statements
not checking their finally section for thrown exceptions. And the goto made it
so
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8547
Summary: Pure Functions Compilation - Not consistent errors
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8547
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Cousens daniel...@bigpond.com 2012-08-15 04:55:41
PDT ---
To be clear, an error was expected for both, not just one.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8548
Summary: relocation R_X86_64_32 against can not be used when
making a shared object
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8549
Summary: Bad error message with const methods
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8550
Summary: std.container.InlinedArray
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6946
Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marco.le...@gmx.de
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8530
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8550
Daniel Cousens daniel...@bigpond.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1759
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8551
Summary: Endless Split
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8530
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Kozak kozz...@gmail.com 2012-08-15 07:29:25 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
If you want to check for NaN, then use std.math.isNaN. As I understand it,
there
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8548
Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@maxim-fomin.ru
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8548
--- Comment #2 from wbr...@gmail.com 2012-08-15 08:09:12 PDT ---
dmd.2.060.zip
dmd2/linux/bin64/dmd
import std.stdio;
void main(string[] args)
{
writeln(hello world);
writefln(args.length = %d, args.length);
foreach (index, arg;
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8530
Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuc...@ubuntu.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3309
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8550
Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8384
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2012-08-15
13:24:08 PDT ---
Another case of confusion due to format treating C strings as pointers:
http://stackoverflow.com/q/11975353/21501
I still think that the current
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8384
--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2012-08-15
13:48:30 PDT ---
Sorry, I don't think that your categorical point of view is constructive. As
long as D will interface with C libraries and programs, people will
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8384
--- Comment #12 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2012-08-15
13:56:00 PDT ---
I would like to stress out a point that I hope could clear up my view of the
logic that writeln/format should use.
Printing/formatting memory
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8553
Summary: templated interface methods (virutal?) and linker
missing symbols
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8384
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-08-15 13:57:15
PDT ---
Anyone who does not understand that char* is _not_ a string will continue to
make mistakes like trying to concatenate a char* to a string (
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8384
--- Comment #14 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2012-08-15
14:01:42 PDT ---
First of all, you are conflating ignorance between the two string types with my
arguments. Users who are aware that D has its own way of handling
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8554
Summary: ddemangle is doing nothing on 64 bit linux
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8384
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-08-15 14:06:49
PDT ---
I'm saying that we shouldn't treat char* differently from int* just because
some newbies expect char* to act like a string. And if you know D, then you
know
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8384
--- Comment #16 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2012-08-15
14:08:44 PDT ---
Well, then how about removing the pointer-printing feature entirely, and issue
a compile-time error on all pointer types?
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8384
--- Comment #17 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2012-08-15
14:12:50 PDT ---
And if you know D, then you know that char* is _not_ a string,
and I don't see how you could expect it to be treated as one.
I don't think this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8384
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8384
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-08-15 14:40:14
PDT ---
Well, then how about removing the pointer-printing feature entirely, and issue
a compile-time error on all pointer types?
So, you're suggesting that we
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8555
Summary: Round Robin and Infinite Ranges
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8550
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-08-15 15:34:34 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
This is called small array optimization except for size of array is hardwired
so that the whole struct fits a couple of words. I suggest to just
33 matches
Mail list logo
