https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #31 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/cc2e825d85b0acab1630f709557cf982c8236a86
fix Issue 3449 - const and
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #30 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com ---
Final removing:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4042
--
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |pull
--- Comment #28
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #29 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-12-27 09:06:56 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #24 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-05-17 13:07:52 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #25 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-05-17 13:09:49 PDT ---
Commit pushed to 2.063 at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #22 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-03-10 00:57:23 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |All
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #21 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-27
17:23:46 PST ---
*** Issue 8193 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #19 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-12-26
14:27:45 PST ---
*** Issue 4203 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #18 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-11-22 03:30:39 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #17 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-07-26 06:14:15 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
How would the programmer suppress this warning because it's deliberate?
When I wrote that, I was thinking that the developer can
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
David Piepgrass qwertie...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #15 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-07-25 14:55:34 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
+1 from me. Implicit static and (worse) implicit enum are bad ideas, and the
worst part is that whether it's static or not depends on
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #16 from David Piepgrass qwertie...@gmail.com 2012-07-25 18:55:01
PDT ---
How would the programmer suppress this warning because it's deliberate?
When I wrote that, I was thinking that the developer can initialize in the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
Masahiro Nakagawa repeate...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #9 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-23
01:37:27 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
More strangeness: If you don't explicitly provide an initial value for
const/immutable members, they do contribute to the size
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|spec|
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #11 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-01-23 04:28:52 PST
---
(In reply to comment #9)
This is as designed. A const field without an initializer can be initialized
by
a constructor. A const field with an initializer does
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #12 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-01-23 05:16:02 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
I think that the *implicit static* variable is the worst
specification in D. 'const/immutable(not modifiable)' and
'static(not
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #8 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2011-11-24 04:14:00 PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
I believe the correct solution is to make const/immutable fields with
initializers into static members.
Changing this would alter the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #2 from Lars T. Kyllingstad bugzi...@kyllingen.net 2009-10-29
23:35:28 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
and in the case of const it is even considered well-defined
behaviour to change their value
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #3 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2009-10-30 06:39:03 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
and in the case of const it is even considered well-defined
behaviour to change their
33 matches
Mail list logo
