[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 --- Comment #17 from Manu --- Thank god! --

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 --- Comment #18 from Manu --- Only 7 years later ;) --

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 --- Comment #16 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commit pushed to stable at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/301a9ac2d27ed5524a0dafdd7ece43166502949b Merge pull request #2867 from rainers/cv_lexicalscope --

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 --- Comment #15 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/301a9ac2d27ed5524a0dafdd7ece43166502949b Merge pull request #2867 from rainers/cv_lexicalscope fix

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |D2 --

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 --- Comment #14 from Manu turkey...@gmail.com --- Where does this stand? I thought this was fixed recently? --

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||turkey...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 --- Comment #11 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2013-11-23 02:58:26 PST --- (In reply to comment #10) I think that it's unlikely that the linker will be considerably improved at this point. Barring merging cv2pdb into DMD, would

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch |pull --- Comment

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 pravic ehy...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ehy...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2012-01-21 13:49:51 PST --- So I guess we are kind of stuck. Is it really much worse than all the temporaries generated as local variables by dmd? Do you see another possibility to pass

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 --- Comment #8 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-21 13:56:03 PST --- Maybe we should defer this then until the linker can be improved. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2012-01-20 00:31:22 PST --- So you are fine with the workaround to emit symbols to be translated back to the block statements? This will create strange symbols @sblk and @send if you

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2012-01-19 13:42:22 PST --- I'd like to if there is a chance to avoid the ugly workaround regarding optlink: Will it be a large issue to add support for S_BLOCK32/S_END debug entries to

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 --- Comment #4 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-19 17:56:43 PST --- That would be a great deal of work, mainly because the optlink codeview code is a giant inscrutable mess. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2009-12-29 02:57:56 PST --- Created an attachment (id=536) add lexical scope to local symbols in codeview debug info The patch consists of two parts: 1. modify the parser to remember the

[Issue 3657] No lexical scope for local variables in debug info

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch