https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |D2
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #17 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-19 07:14:29 PST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> This is a bug in format. Even the partial fix I made for bug 5237, makes
> BigInt
> print correctly, without any change to the BigInt code.
>
>
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan M Davis 2010-11-18 14:32:17
PST ---
Well, then I think that we agree on the desired eventual functionality. But I
do think that in the interim, it would be a good idea to add string toString()
to BigInt with the i
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #14 from Don 2010-11-18 13:39:08 PST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> So, you don't want writeln(bi); or to!string(bi) to work?
No, that's not what I meant.
> I would think that
> ideally, BigInt would work exactly the same way tha
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan M Davis 2010-11-18 12:33:01
PST ---
Whoops. I meant %x, not %f for hex. Sorry about that.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan M Davis 2010-11-18 12:31:36
PST ---
So, you don't want writeln(bi); or to!string(bi) to work? I would think that
ideally, BigInt would work exactly the same way that integers do.
to!string(i) -> decimal
writeln(i
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #11 from Don 2010-11-18 12:01:39 PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> >
> > If it was just a question of inefficiency, I would have implemented it. The
> > issue is that it doesn't get the formatting strin
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #10 from Steven Schveighoffer 2010-11-18
10:20:08 PST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
>
> If it was just a question of inefficiency, I would have implemented it. The
> issue is that it doesn't get the formatting string.
> So
> BigInt
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #9 from Don 2010-11-18 08:42:45 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Second, it's they way things currently work. It's like saying you refuse to
> have const functions because they should be inout, but inout doesn't work.
> When to
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #8 from Steven Schveighoffer 2010-11-18
06:30:23 PST ---
Pardon me for saying so, but that's too short-sighted.
first, it's not just a writeln/format change, it's a compiler change too. The
compiler is the one who decides whether
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #7 from Don 2010-11-18 05:58:20 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> So BigInt's aren't printable via writeln in protest?
Yes. I refuse to play any part in propagating the toString() abomination.
BigInt wi
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schvei...@yahoo.com
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #5 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-11-18 00:57:38 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> What is worrying is that void toString is nowhere documented. Does std.format
> use it or what?
Should be: is it supposed to use it? Of course it doesn'
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
nfx...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nfx...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis 2010-11-18 00:24:35
PST ---
void toString()? Normally, it's string toString(). The only problem that I'm
aware of with regards to toString() design at the moment is the fact that it
must be _exactly_ string
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #2 from Don 2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Com
18 matches
Mail list logo
