[Issue 6148] Make templates smarter about instantiating with implicitly convertible arrays

2015-06-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6148

Andrei Alexandrescu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|unspecified |D2

--


[Issue 6148] Make templates smarter about instantiating with implicitly convertible arrays

2012-01-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6148


Jonathan M Davis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


--- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis  2012-01-20 23:21:33 
PST ---
I believe that the recent changes to IFTI to make dynamic array types
tail-const for IFTI essentially fixes this. The issue with static arrays
remains, but I'm increasingly convinced that not havin static arrays
automatically treated as dynamic arrays with range-based functions is  _good_
thing, since they're not ranges, and slicing them can be dangerous. If
anything, I'd argue that static arrays should _never_ implicitly convert to
dynamic arrays and that they should always have to be explicitly sliced to do
the conversion.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 6148] Make templates smarter about instantiating with implicitly convertible arrays

2011-06-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6148


Steven Schveighoffer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||schvei...@yahoo.com


--- Comment #4 from Steven Schveighoffer  2011-06-12 
11:24:51 PDT ---
Also, see bug 4998 as a possible solution, it can be modified to include more
general cases besides literals.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 6148] Make templates smarter about instantiating with implicitly convertible arrays

2011-06-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6148



--- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis  2011-06-11 23:31:20 
PDT ---
Yeah. Bug# 5666 is related as well. Both bug# 4971 and bug# 5666 deal with
specific instances where this enhancement would fix the problem.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 6148] Make templates smarter about instantiating with implicitly convertible arrays

2011-06-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6148


kenn...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kenn...@gmail.com


--- Comment #2 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-06-11 23:23:31 PDT ---
Bug 5666?

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 6148] Make templates smarter about instantiating with implicitly convertible arrays

2011-06-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6148



--- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis  2011-06-11 20:06:08 
PDT ---
Related: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4971

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---