http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251
Leandro Lucarella changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leandro.lucarella@sociomant
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251
Rob Jacques changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251
--- Comment #6 from wfunct...@hotmail.com 2012-03-01 14:53:44 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> No, it's inevitable that a mark-and-sweep GC on a 32 bit system won't work if
> large numbers of false pointers are present. And this code:
>
>
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251
--- Comment #5 from Don 2012-03-01 03:39:55 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > Just wondering, why was this marked as "Resolved, Invalid" with no
> > > comment?
> >
> > Huh? Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251
wfunct...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |REMIND
--- Comment #4 from wfun
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251
wfunct...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVA
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251
David Simcha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|