[Issue 7251] GC not working

2013-05-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251 Leandro Lucarella changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leandro.lucarella@sociomant

[Issue 7251] GC not working

2012-03-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251 Rob Jacques changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4 CC|

[Issue 7251] GC not working

2012-03-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251 --- Comment #6 from wfunct...@hotmail.com 2012-03-01 14:53:44 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) > No, it's inevitable that a mark-and-sweep GC on a 32 bit system won't work if > large numbers of false pointers are present. And this code: > >

[Issue 7251] GC not working

2012-03-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251 --- Comment #5 from Don 2012-03-01 03:39:55 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > Just wondering, why was this marked as "Resolved, Invalid" with no > > > comment? > > > > Huh? Comment

[Issue 7251] GC not working

2012-03-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251 wfunct...@hotmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |REMIND --- Comment #4 from wfun

[Issue 7251] GC not working

2012-03-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 7251] GC not working

2012-02-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251 wfunct...@hotmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVA

[Issue 7251] GC not working

2012-01-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7251 David Simcha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|