https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
Jack Stouffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@jackstouffer.com
Depends on|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
--- Comment #17 from Joseph Rushton Wakeling
2013-07-04 03:10:53 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> If not already present I suggest you to open an enhancement request that asks
> for your improvement of zip, and then we'll make this issue de
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
--- Comment #16 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-06-29 03:16:46 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> I think deprecating lockstep in favour of zip is a no-no unless
> one can do a systematic replace, 's/lockstep/zip/' and have the new code Just
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
--- Comment #15 from Joseph Rushton Wakeling
2013-06-29 02:50:34 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Glancing through the code, it looks like an issue of design difference
> rather than a bug per se.
The docs note that std.range.zip "offers m
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
--- Comment #14 from Joseph Rushton Wakeling
2013-06-29 02:48:35 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I see, for that I sometimes use a pattern like this:
Very cool! :-)
Nevertheless, I think deprecating lockstep in favour of zip is a no-no u
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
--- Comment #13 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-06-28 17:18:28 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> In my real application, the value of x was determined by some rather complex
> calculations for which i was a parameter, so copy doesn't work ei
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
--- Comment #12 from Joseph Rushton Wakeling
2013-06-28 15:51:51 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Such cases are better solved using the copy() algorithm.
I accept the point, but I still think that the code given shouldn't fail with
zip.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
--- Comment #11 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-06-28 13:57:42 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Thanks for the useful hint :-) In fact in the general case where I discovered
> this issue, the use case was more,
>
> foreach(i, ref x; l
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
--- Comment #10 from Joseph Rushton Wakeling
2013-06-28 13:21:31 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Let me add a note. For your specific use case it's better to use enumerate(),
> from Issue 5550 :
>
> auto arr1 = new double[10];
> fo
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
--- Comment #9 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-06-28 09:46:37 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> auto arr1 = new double[10];
> foreach(i, ref x; zip(iota(10), arr1))
> {
> x = i;
> }
> writeln(arr1);
>
> auto a
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
Joseph Rushton Wakeling changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joseph.wakel...@webdrake.ne
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
--- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-06-05 16:36:14 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> You might introduce a new template tomorrow, and then remove it a month later,
> so why should I even bother coding against such a library? Is Pho
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
--- Comment #6 from Andrej Mitrovic 2012-06-05
15:18:38 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Yes let's break code
>
> You can't assume Phobos will not change.
You might introduce a new template tomorrow, and then
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
--- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-06-05 15:04:06 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Yes let's break code and make new code more verbose, great idea.
Your answers have made those arguments of mine stronger, so thank you for your
us
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-06-05 15:01:26 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Yes let's break code
You can't assume Phobos will not change. Some parts of Phobos were designed
very quickly, and not at their best. We need dep
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
--- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic 2012-06-05
14:15:51 PDT ---
Yes let's break code and make new code more verbose, great idea.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mai
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-06-05 13:45:11 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Sorry, but I *do* use the index variable:
I didn't said that index variable is never useful and never used. I have said
its need is rare, in my ex
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8155
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comme
19 matches
Mail list logo
