Re: Bugzilla Downtime

2009-05-10 Thread Walter Bright
Thanks for taking care of this, Brad!

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

2009-05-10 Thread Jarrett Billingsley
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Brad Roberts wrote: > > I don't see that problem at all using windows firefox 3.0.10. > > I suggest flushing your cache.. make sure you've got current .css files. > > Later, > Brad Oh, nice, that worked!

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

2009-05-10 Thread Sean Kelly
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Brad Roberts wrote: Sean Kelly wrote: Jarrett Billingsley wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: http://d.p

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

2009-05-10 Thread Tomas Lindquist Olsen
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Brad Roberts wrote: > Sean Kelly wrote: >> Jarrett Billingsley wrote: >>> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) >>> >>> Indeed it is!  Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: >>> >>> http://d.pure

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

2009-05-10 Thread Tomas Lindquist Olsen
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Jarrett Billingsley wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >> >> Whooo, it's very pretty :) >> > > Indeed it is!  Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 > > Anyone else

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

2009-05-10 Thread Brad Roberts
Sean Kelly wrote: > Jarrett Billingsley wrote: >> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >>> Whooo, it's very pretty :) >>> >> >> Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: >> >> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 >> >> Anyone else notice t

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

2009-05-10 Thread Sean Kelly
Jarrett Billingsley wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 Anyone else notice this? It's kind of a mess on Safari. I'

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

2009-05-10 Thread Jarrett Billingsley
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > > Whooo, it's very pretty :) > Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 Anyone else notice this?

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

2009-05-10 Thread Nick Sabalausky
"Brad Roberts" wrote in message news:mailman.31.1241943078.13405.digitalmars-d-b...@puremagic.com... > Brad Roberts wrote: >> Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it >> to a new >> host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm >> Seattl

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

2009-05-10 Thread Brad Roberts
Brad Roberts wrote: > Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it to a > new > host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm > Seattle > time. The process shouldn't take all that long, but I'll estimate an hour > just > to give myself some

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

2009-05-09 Thread Brad Roberts
Stewart Gordon wrote: > Brad Roberts wrote: >> Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move >> it to a new host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at >> around 10 or 11pm Seattle time. > > > For those who aren't in Seattle, from what I can make of the informati

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

2009-05-09 Thread Stewart Gordon
Brad Roberts wrote: Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it to a new host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm Seattle time. For those who aren't in Seattle, from what I can make of the information on Wikipedia, that's around 05:

Re: Bugzilla Downtime

2009-05-09 Thread Jarrett Billingsley
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Brad Roberts wrote: > Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it to a > new > host.  I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm > Seattle > time.  The process shouldn't take all that long, but I'll estimate an ho