Re: Bugzilla Downtime
Thanks for taking care of this, Brad!
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Brad Roberts wrote: > > I don't see that problem at all using windows firefox 3.0.10. > > I suggest flushing your cache.. make sure you've got current .css files. > > Later, > Brad Oh, nice, that worked!
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Brad Roberts wrote: Sean Kelly wrote: Jarrett Billingsley wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 Anyone else notice this? It's kind of a mess on Safari. I'll file a report :-) I don't see that problem at all using windows firefox 3.0.10. I suggest flushing your cache.. make sure you've got current .css files. You're right, a proper reload fixed it ! :) Yup. Same here.
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Brad Roberts wrote: > Sean Kelly wrote: >> Jarrett Billingsley wrote: >>> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) >>> >>> Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: >>> >>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 >>> >>> Anyone else notice this? >> >> It's kind of a mess on Safari. I'll file a report :-) > > I don't see that problem at all using windows firefox 3.0.10. > > I suggest flushing your cache.. make sure you've got current .css files. You're right, a proper reload fixed it ! :) > > Later, > Brad >
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Jarrett Billingsley wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >> >> Whooo, it's very pretty :) >> > > Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 > > Anyone else notice this? > Yup!
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
Sean Kelly wrote: > Jarrett Billingsley wrote: >> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >>> Whooo, it's very pretty :) >>> >> >> Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: >> >> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 >> >> Anyone else notice this? > > It's kind of a mess on Safari. I'll file a report :-) I don't see that problem at all using windows firefox 3.0.10. I suggest flushing your cache.. make sure you've got current .css files. Later, Brad
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
Jarrett Billingsley wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Whooo, it's very pretty :) Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 Anyone else notice this? It's kind of a mess on Safari. I'll file a report :-)
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > > Whooo, it's very pretty :) > Indeed it is! Save for an apparent rendering problem with Firefox: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2959 Anyone else notice this?
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
"Brad Roberts" wrote in message news:mailman.31.1241943078.13405.digitalmars-d-b...@puremagic.com... > Brad Roberts wrote: >> Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it >> to a new >> host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm >> Seattle >> time. The process shouldn't take all that long, but I'll estimate an >> hour just >> to give myself some padding time. >> >> Later, >> Brad > > Ok.. I've changed the dns entry to the new server, so as soon as it > propagates > around the world, the new site will be active. I'm sure it's not perfect > yet.. > but it's good enough to open up. Please file bug reports against > puremagic.com > if you find something wrong or missing. I haven't fully incorporated all > of the > customizations I'd made to the previous version, but at least the posting > to the > newsgroups part works again. > > Later, > Brad Whooo, it's very pretty :)
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
Brad Roberts wrote: > Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it to a > new > host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm > Seattle > time. The process shouldn't take all that long, but I'll estimate an hour > just > to give myself some padding time. > > Later, > Brad Ok.. I've changed the dns entry to the new server, so as soon as it propagates around the world, the new site will be active. I'm sure it's not perfect yet.. but it's good enough to open up. Please file bug reports against puremagic.com if you find something wrong or missing. I haven't fully incorporated all of the customizations I'd made to the previous version, but at least the posting to the newsgroups part works again. Later, Brad
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
Stewart Gordon wrote: > Brad Roberts wrote: >> Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move >> it to a new host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at >> around 10 or 11pm Seattle time. > > > For those who aren't in Seattle, from what I can make of the information > on Wikipedia, that's around 05:00 or 06:00 UTC. > > Speaking of which, does the version you're updating to include the fix > for bug 1047? I hope so > > Stewart. Right now: # date -u Sun May 10 00:15:21 UTC 2009 # date Sat May 9 17:15:21 PDT 2009 So, -7 hours. I know it has some time related changes, but I haven't searched for that one. You're welcome to check on it yourself. It's not like the bugzilla source or bug tracking system is a secret. Honestly, I've never once looked at any of the times in bugzilla. Occasionally I'll care about month and year, but time? It's just not meaningful data. Later, Brad
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
Brad Roberts wrote: Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it to a new host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm Seattle time. For those who aren't in Seattle, from what I can make of the information on Wikipedia, that's around 05:00 or 06:00 UTC. Speaking of which, does the version you're updating to include the fix for bug 1047? I hope so Stewart.
Re: Bugzilla Downtime
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Brad Roberts wrote: > Tonight I'm going to update bugzilla to the current release and move it to a > new > host. I'll put the existing copy in read-only mode at around 10 or 11pm > Seattle > time. The process shouldn't take all that long, but I'll estimate an hour > just > to give myself some padding time. > > Later, > Brad > And by Murphy's Law, everyone will find about three bugs at that time ;)
