On Tuesday 15 March 2011 22:05:37 Ali Çehreli wrote:
> I am going over some sample programs in a text of mine and replacing
> std.cstream references with std.stdio. There are non-trivial differences
> with formatted input.
>
> The following program may be surprising to the novice:
>
> import std.
Ali Çehreli Wrote:
> Right? Is there a better way that I am missing?
>
> Thank you,
> Ali
No better way, the stated reason IIRC is that it is easier to remove the new
line then to append it back on.
I am going over some sample programs in a text of mine and replacing
std.cstream references with std.stdio. There are non-trivial differences
with formatted input.
The following program may be surprising to the novice:
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
write("What is your name? ");
stri
On 15/03/2011 1:57 a.m., Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:57:32 -0500, Spacen Jasset
wrote:
On 10/03/2011 12:18, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:19:55 -0500, Joel Christensen
wrote:
This is on Windows 7. Using a def file to stop the terminal window
comi
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:40:32 +0300, nedbrek wrote:
Hello,
I have some wrappers for C functions which I am exporting to D.
For D1, I can just use char*.
For D2, I get compiler errors when I try to assign string constants to my
char* variables. It seems the best way is to make them immutabl
On 3/16/11, bearophile wrote:
> I meant to suggest you to use the
> std.algorithm sort instead of the deprecated built-in one, because the
> built-in one is slow and it has bad bugs, like this one I've found:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2819
Thanks, I didn't know about the bug
Andrej Mitrovic:
> Correction: DMD complains about having parentheses, in fact it's an error:
> ngparser.d(28): Error: undefined identifier module ngparser.sort
>
> So I've had to remove them. And again that's that uninformative error
> message which I don't like.
Sorry, this time the uninformat
Hello,
I have some wrappers for C functions which I am exporting to D.
For D1, I can just use char*.
For D2, I get compiler errors when I try to assign string constants to my
char* variables. It seems the best way is to make them immutable(char).
1) If I make the functions take immutable(ch
On 3/15/11, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>
>>
>> I suggest to replace this:
>> sortedKeys.sort;
>>
>> With:
>> sortedKeys.sort();
>>
>
> Yes, I prefer it that way too.
Correction: DMD complains about having parentheses, in fact it's an error:
ngparser.d(28): Error: undefined identifier module ngparser.
On 3/15/11, bearophile wrote:
> Andrej Mitrovic:
>
>> I've also implemented an `allSatisfy` function which works on runtime
>> arguments. There's a similar function in std.typetuple, but its only
>> useful for compile-time arguments. There's probably a similar method
>> someplace in std.algorithm,
Andrej Mitrovic:
> I've also implemented an `allSatisfy` function which works on runtime
> arguments. There's a similar function in std.typetuple, but its only useful
> for compile-time arguments. There's probably a similar method someplace in
> std.algorithm, but I was too lazy to check. I tho
I thought about making a kind of code-golf contest (stackoverflow usually has
these contests). Only I would focus on improving each others code.
So here's my idea of the day: Parse the newsgroup archive files from
http://www.digitalmars.com/NewsGroup.html, and for each .html file output
another
On 2011-03-15 13:20:30 -0400, "Simen kjaeraas" said:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:36:04 +0100, Michel Fortin
wrote:
On 2011-03-15 10:42:46 -0400, Magnus Lie Hetland said:
I've got a function template along these lines:
Foo!T foo(T)(T[] bar, real function(T,T) baz) { ... }
The main reason
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:36:04 +0100, Michel Fortin
wrote:
On 2011-03-15 10:42:46 -0400, Magnus Lie Hetland
said:
I've got a function template along these lines:
Foo!T foo(T)(T[] bar, real function(T,T) baz) { ... }
The main reason I'm using this is that it seems necessary to use a
f
On 2011-03-15 10:42:46 -0400, Magnus Lie Hetland said:
I've got a function template along these lines:
Foo!T foo(T)(T[] bar, real function(T,T) baz) { ... }
The main reason I'm using this is that it seems necessary to use a
function, rather than a type (such as Foo), if you want the compil
I've got a function template along these lines:
Foo!T foo(T)(T[] bar, real function(T,T) baz) { ... }
The main reason I'm using this is that it seems necessary to use a
function, rather than a type (such as Foo), if you want the compiler to
deduce the compile-time parameters. (Right?)
Now .
16 matches
Mail list logo