On Friday, March 02, 2012 20:41:35 Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/02/2012 06:30 PM, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Hello,
For this code:
auto c = testc;
auto w = testw;
auto d = testd;
pragma(msg, typeof(c.front));
pragma(msg, typeof(w.front));
pragma(msg, typeof(d.front));
Hi,
I'm trying to send structs using std.concurrency. the struct contains
a Tid (the id of the sender) so that the receiver can send an answer.
say:
struct Foo
{
Tid tid;
string str;
}
// ...
Foo f = {
tid: thisTid,
str: hello!
};
std.concurrency.send(someThread, f);
//
Le samedi 03 mars 2012 à 02:39 +0100, Adam D. Ruppe a écrit :
On Saturday, 3 March 2012 at 01:36:51 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
int opIndex(int x) {
Make that
(int x, string file = __FILE__, int line = __LINE__)
and use file/line in there. The exception consturctors
do this, so
On 2012-03-02 20:30, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 18:10:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Both should work, and the man page is going to be for git-rebase.
Pretty much
all of the git commands can be used with or without a -.
On my system, the dashed commands are not
On 2012-03-03 03:30, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Hello,
For this code:
auto c = testc;
auto w = testw;
auto d = testd;
pragma(msg, typeof(c.front));
pragma(msg, typeof(w.front));
pragma(msg, typeof(d.front));
compiler prints:
dchar
dchar
immutable(dchar)
I thought all these would be either dchar
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, March 02, 2012 20:41:35 Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/02/2012 06:30 PM, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Hello,
For this code:
auto c = testc;
auto w = testw;
auto d = testd;
pragma(msg, typeof(c.front));
pragma(msg, typeof(w.front));
On 03/03/2012 04:36 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-03 03:30, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Hello,
For this code:
auto c = testc;
auto w = testw;
auto d = testd;
pragma(msg, typeof(c.front));
pragma(msg, typeof(w.front));
pragma(msg, typeof(d.front));
compiler prints:
dchar
dchar
Dear,
i do not understand what is wrong in my code and produce this:
-
$ ldc2 ../../lib/libdscience-ldc.a -I=../.. fasta.d
/usr/include/d/std/range.d(295): Error: static assert Cannot put a
Sequence into a LockingTextWriter
instantiatied in
On 03/03/2012 05:57 AM, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Consider a custom range of
char:
struct CharRange
{
@property bool empty();
@property char front();
void popFront();
}
typeof(CharRange.front) and ElementType!CharRange both return _char_
Yes, and I would expect both to the same type.
On 3/3/12, bioinfornatics bioinfornat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I think __LINE__ is size_t not int
I'd love to see a 2_147_483_648 line source file! :D
hi,
In ruby we can delegate some method. by example:
Ruby
class MineArray
include Forwardable
def_delegators: @array, :[], :[]=, :each_with_index, :length
def initialize( array )
@array = array
end
end
-
this code delegate opIndexAssign opIndex, length ...
Le samedi 03 mars 2012 à 17:42 +0100, bioinfornatics a écrit :
hi,
In ruby we can delegate some method. by example:
Ruby
class MineArray
include Forwardable
def_delegators: @array, :[], :[]=, :each_with_index, :length
def initialize( array )
@array = array
end
end
Le samedi 03 mars 2012 à 07:38 -0800, Ali Çehreli a écrit :
On 03/03/2012 06:11 AM, bioinfornatics wrote:
Dear,
i do not understand what is wrong in my code and produce this:
-
$ ldc2 ../../lib/libdscience-ldc.a -I=../.. fasta.d
On 03/03/2012 09:40 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
... but operating on
code points is _far_ more correct than operating on code units. It's also more
efficient.
[snip.]
No, it is less efficient.
On 03/03/2012 12:09 PM, Nicolas Silva wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to send structs using std.concurrency. the struct contains
a Tid (the id of the sender) so that the receiver can send an answer.
say:
struct Foo
{
Tid tid;
string str;
}
// ...
Foo f = {
tid: thisTid,
str: hello!
};
Any suggestions for using std.parallelism (like MPI for C/C++)
for server clusters? Alternatively, how might I use MPI with D?
On 2012-03-03 15:10, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/03/2012 04:36 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-03 03:30, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Hello,
For this code:
auto c = testc;
auto w = testw;
auto d = testd;
pragma(msg, typeof(c.front));
pragma(msg, typeof(w.front));
pragma(msg, typeof(d.front));
On 2012-03-03 17:50, bioinfornatics wrote:
Le samedi 03 mars 2012 à 17:42 +0100, bioinfornatics a écrit :
hi,
In ruby we can delegate some method. by example:
Ruby
class MineArray
include Forwardable
def_delegators: @array, :[], :[]=, :each_with_index, :length
def
Le samedi 03 mars 2012 à 19:18 +0100, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
On 2012-03-03 17:50, bioinfornatics wrote:
Le samedi 03 mars 2012 à 17:42 +0100, bioinfornatics a écrit :
hi,
In ruby we can delegate some method. by example:
Ruby
class MineArray
include Forwardable
On Saturday, 3 March 2012 at 16:50:45 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
can w do same in D ?
alias this does that, although it does for all unknown
methods, not specific ones:
struct A {
int[] data;
alias data this;
}
A a;
a[0] = 10; // this works like a.data[0] = 10;
alias this also lets
Le samedi 03 mars 2012 à 19:45 +0100, Adam D. Ruppe a écrit :
On Saturday, 3 March 2012 at 16:50:45 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
can w do same in D ?
alias this does that, although it does for all unknown
methods, not specific ones:
struct A {
int[] data;
alias data this;
}
A
Le samedi 03 mars 2012 à 19:18 +0100, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
On 2012-03-03 17:50, bioinfornatics wrote:
Le samedi 03 mars 2012 à 17:42 +0100, bioinfornatics a écrit :
hi,
In ruby we can delegate some method. by example:
Ruby
class MineArray
include Forwardable
On Saturday, March 03, 2012 13:21:05 bioinfornatics wrote:
Le samedi 03 mars 2012 à 02:39 +0100, Adam D. Ruppe a écrit :
On Saturday, 3 March 2012 at 01:36:51 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
int opIndex(int x) {
Make that
(int x, string file = __FILE__, int line = __LINE__)
On Saturday, March 03, 2012 18:38:44 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/03/2012 09:40 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
... but operating on
code points is _far_ more correct than operating on code units. It's also
more efficient.
[snip.]
No, it is less efficient.
Operating on code points is more
On Saturday, March 03, 2012 14:57:59 Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
This discrepancy pushes the range writer to handle special string cases.
Yes it does. And there's _no_ way around that if you want to handle unicode
both correctly and efficiently. To handle it correctly, you must operate on
code
On 03/03/2012 08:46 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, March 03, 2012 18:38:44 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03/03/2012 09:40 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
... but operating on
code points is _far_ more correct than operating on code units. It's also
more efficient.
[snip.]
No, it is less
When I try to build LDC on Debian Squeeze I get the following
error when running cmake:
CMake Error at
/usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:70
(MESSAGE):
REQUIRED_VARS (missing: VERSION_VAR)
Does anyone here know what VERSION_VAR is and what should I set
it
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 03:52:55PM +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/3/12, bioinfornatics bioinfornat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I think __LINE__ is size_t not int
I'd love to see a 2_147_483_648 line source file! :D
It *could* happen if the source file was auto-generated... and the
On 03/03/2012 09:00 AM, bioinfornatics wrote:
Le samedi 03 mars 2012 à 07:38 -0800, Ali Çehreli a écrit :
On 03/03/2012 06:11 AM, bioinfornatics wrote:
Dear,
i do not understand what is wrong in my code and produce this:
-
$ ldc2
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:42:53PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
The current solution encourages correct usage (or at least usage which
is closer to correct, since it still isn't at the grapheme level)
without disallowing more optimized code.
[...]
Speaking of graphemes, is anyone
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 11:53:41AM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
If you want to iterate by char, then use foreach or use a wrapper
range (or cast to ubyte[] and operate on that).
Or use:
string str = ...;
for (size_t i=0; i str.length; i++) {
/* do
On 03/03/2012 01:42 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:42:53PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
The current solution encourages correct usage (or at least usage which
is closer to correct, since it still isn't at the grapheme level)
without disallowing more optimized code.
On 3/3/12, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
Of course, with D's templates, CTFE, and compile-time introspection
capabilities, I can't imagine when autogeneration would actually be
required, but we're talking about hypotheticals here.
It can be if you need an OOP D binding to a C/C++
Le samedi 03 mars 2012 à 19:18 +0100, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
On 2012-03-03 17:50, bioinfornatics wrote:
Le samedi 03 mars 2012 à 17:42 +0100, bioinfornatics a écrit :
hi,
In ruby we can delegate some method. by example:
Ruby
class MineArray
include Forwardable
import std.stdio;
void check() { writeln(check); }
struct Foo { bool isTrue = true; }
struct Bar { }
void test(T)(T t)
{
static if (is(T == Foo))
{
if (t.isTrue)
check();
}
else
{
check();
}
}
void main()
{
Foo foo;
Bar bar;
On Saturday, March 03, 2012 13:46:16 Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/03/2012 01:42 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:42:53PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
The current solution encourages correct usage (or at least usage which
is closer to correct, since it still isn't at
dear,
I have a little code who is able to delegate to an array see below code:
https://gist.github.com/1969776
It should realy great to have same into std.array and into std.range
(for reach different range )
On Saturday, March 03, 2012 13:46:16 Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/03/2012 01:42 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:42:53PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
[...]
The current solution encourages correct usage (or at least usage which
is closer to correct, since it still isn't at
04.03.2012 3:42, Andrej Mitrovic пишет:
[...code...]
I want to avoid writing check() twice. I only have to statically
check a field of a member if it's of a certain type (Foo).
One solution would be to use a boolean:
void test(T)(T t)
{
bool isTrue = true;
static if (is(T == Foo))
Ok, well a quick search shows socket.d:132 needs fixing. Also there's
two versioned out enforces in object_.d which use int line = __LINE__.
Interestingly, earlier versions of Phobos used int a lot (I guess in
pre-64bit compatible D days). I'm also seeing int used in Derelict,
pspemu, plot2kill
On Sunday, March 04, 2012 03:38:03 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Ok, well a quick search shows socket.d:132 needs fixing. Also there's
two versioned out enforces in object_.d which use int line = __LINE__.
Interestingly, earlier versions of Phobos used int a lot (I guess in
pre-64bit compatible D
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.364.1330825349.24984.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
import std.stdio;
void check() { writeln(check); }
struct Foo { bool isTrue = true; }
struct Bar { }
void test(T)(T t)
{
static if (is(T == Foo))
{
You're right it should be able do that dead-code elimination thing.
Slipped my mind. :)
On 3/4/12, Daniel Murphy yebbl...@nospamgmail.com wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.364.1330825349.24984.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com...
import std.stdio;
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
...snip...
I want to avoid writing check() twice. I only have to statically
check a field of a member if it's of a certain type (Foo).
One solution would be to use a boolean:
void test(T)(T t)
{
bool isTrue = true;
static if (is(T == Foo))
isTrue =
44 matches
Mail list logo
