I'm new, and trying to incorporate assert and enforce into my
program properly.
My question revolves around, the fact that assert is only
evaluated when using the debug switch. I read that assert throws
a more serious exception than enforce does, is this correct?
I'm trying to use enforce in
On 3/14/12, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> void foo(S s) // compiler decides to pass by ref
> {
> s = S(2);
> }
Well in this case it wouldn't pass by ref since it sees an assignment.
But I can see how this would become tricky business (e.g. "why is my
code slow all of a sudden"). const ref has
On Wednesday, March 14, 2012 01:36:40 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 14-03-2012 01:18, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 14, 2012 01:14:04 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> >> On 14-03-2012 01:10, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 22:03:45 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On Wednesday, March 14, 2012 01:43:54 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 3/14/12, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > As I understand it, auto ref is supposed to work with _any_ function. The
> > _compiler_ decides whether it's best to use a ref or a value.
>
> I never really understood the need for 'const ref'
On 14-03-2012 01:43, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/14/12, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
As I understand it, auto ref is supposed to work with _any_ function. The
_compiler_ decides whether it's best to use a ref or a value.
I never really understood the need for 'const ref' with structures. If
the co
On 3/14/12, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> As I understand it, auto ref is supposed to work with _any_ function. The
> _compiler_ decides whether it's best to use a ref or a value.
I never really understood the need for 'const ref' with structures. If
the compiler knows the size of a structure shouldn
On 14-03-2012 01:18, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, March 14, 2012 01:14:04 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 14-03-2012 01:10, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 22:03:45 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Did you see my other post? Maybe we could do something like this:
equals_t
Oops, I didn't see the replies, after my last message. I'll check
this out. Thanks!
On Tuesday, 13 March 2012 at 20:34:54 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
SciD is a scientific math library providing vectors/matrices of
arbitrary
sizes, but not useful at all for game development.
See gl3n for a game-orient
On Wednesday, March 14, 2012 01:14:04 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 14-03-2012 01:10, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 22:03:45 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> >> Did you see my other post? Maybe we could do something like this:
> >>
> >> equals_t opEquals()(const auto ref Sys
"Timon Gehr" wrote in message
news:jjokc7$t3j$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 03/13/2012 11:29 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> I'm reading through D's grammar spec, and maybe it's just not enough
>> sleep
>> or some such, but my brain is turning to mud:
>>
>> Is there a simple operator precidence cha
Alex R. Petersen:
> Most compilers implement booleans as native integers and narrow/expand
> them when storing/loading to/from memory, so it's unlikely to matter at all.
If you have the int value 25, this is a true value, in C you are free to use it
for its zero/nonzero quality. But if opEquals
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 18:29:03 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> I'm reading through D's grammar spec, and maybe it's just not enough sleep
> or some such, but my brain is turning to mud:
>
> Is there a simple operator precidence chart somewhere? (Also, for
> associativity: Assign and OpAssign are rig
On 14-03-2012 01:10, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 22:03:45 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Did you see my other post? Maybe we could do something like this:
equals_t opEquals()(const auto ref SysTime rhs) const pure nothrow
That would probably work (though I wouldn't use equa
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 22:03:45 Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> Did you see my other post? Maybe we could do something like this:
>
> equals_t opEquals()(const auto ref SysTime rhs) const pure nothrow
That would probably work (though I wouldn't use equals_t, since it seems like
an utterly point
On 03/13/2012 11:29 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I'm reading through D's grammar spec, and maybe it's just not enough sleep
or some such, but my brain is turning to mud:
Is there a simple operator precidence chart somewhere?
I don't think there is, but I think I can create one:
!
On 13-03-2012 23:35, bearophile wrote:
Alex R. Petersen:
It was an integer in the past (believe it or not). :) equals_t made the
transition easier.
Thank you for your answers, now I understand.
Using an int makes sense for opEquals, because if opEquals doesn't get inlined
then using int is s
Alex R. Petersen:
> It was an integer in the past (believe it or not). :) equals_t made the
> transition easier.
Thank you for your answers, now I understand.
Using an int makes sense for opEquals, because if opEquals doesn't get inlined
then using int is sometimes able to give you a bit more e
I'm reading through D's grammar spec, and maybe it's just not enough sleep
or some such, but my brain is turning to mud:
Is there a simple operator precidence chart somewhere? (Also, for
associativity: Assign and OpAssign are right-associative and everything else
is left-associative, correct?)
On 13-03-2012 22:08, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:02:19PM +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 13-03-2012 21:39, bearophile wrote:
Alex R. Petersen:
(Stylistic note: use equals_t instead of bool.)
What is equals_t?
See it's used here:
http://dlang.org/phobos/object.html
Bye
SciD looks nice, but it seems to be a bit too complicated for my
use. Are there any other alternatives?
On Tuesday, 13 March 2012 at 20:14:14 UTC, Chris Pons wrote:
Thanks, I'll take a look. I'm new, so I might need some help
properly building this. I will post back if I have any problems.
O
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:02:19PM +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 13-03-2012 21:39, bearophile wrote:
> >Alex R. Petersen:
> >
> >>(Stylistic note: use equals_t instead of bool.)
> >
> >What is equals_t?
> >See it's used here:
> >http://dlang.org/phobos/object.html
> >
> >Bye,
> >bearophile
On 13-03-2012 21:55, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 19:28:26 Johannes Pfau wrote:
My std.uuid module doesn't compile with the latest dmd. I guess it's
because of a wrong opEquals signature, this is what I have now:
--
@safe pure nothrow bool opEquals(ref const UUID s
On 13-03-2012 21:39, bearophile wrote:
Alex R. Petersen:
(Stylistic note: use equals_t instead of bool.)
What is equals_t?
See it's used here:
http://dlang.org/phobos/object.html
Bye,
bearophile
It's just aliased to bool right now.
--
- Alex
Stride(T) row()
{
}
Stride!(T) row()
{
}
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 19:28:26 Johannes Pfau wrote:
> My std.uuid module doesn't compile with the latest dmd. I guess it's
> because of a wrong opEquals signature, this is what I have now:
>
> --
> @safe pure nothrow bool opEquals(ref const UUID s) const
> {
> return s.data == this.da
On 03/13/2012 09:30 PM, sclytrack wrote:
On 03/13/2012 09:06 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 14.03.2012 0:03, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:25:49PM +0100, Chris Pons wrote:
Does D have a math library that defines, points, vectors and
matrices including the appropriate functions(a
Alex R. Petersen:
> (Stylistic note: use equals_t instead of bool.)
What is equals_t?
See it's used here:
http://dlang.org/phobos/object.html
Bye,
bearophile
SciD is a scientific math library providing vectors/matrices of
arbitrary
sizes, but not useful at all for game development.
See gl3n for a game-oriented vector/matrix library:
https://bitbucket.org/dav1d/gl3n
Also, AFAIK, Manu is working on what should end up being
a Phobos module for game-ori
On 03/13/2012 09:06 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 14.03.2012 0:03, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:25:49PM +0100, Chris Pons wrote:
Does D have a math library that defines, points, vectors and
matrices including the appropriate functions(addition, dot product,
cross product, etc)?
What the title says. It seems that core.sync.mutex does, but not sure
about the synchronized statement.
--
- Alex
Thanks, I'll take a look. I'm new, so I might need some help
properly building this. I will post back if I have any problems.
On Tuesday, 13 March 2012 at 20:06:13 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 14.03.2012 0:03, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:25:49PM +0100, Chris Pons wrote:
Do
On 14.03.2012 0:03, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:25:49PM +0100, Chris Pons wrote:
Does D have a math library that defines, points, vectors and
matrices including the appropriate functions(addition, dot product,
cross product, etc)?
I'd like to know too.
I have a medium-sized D
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:25:49PM +0100, Chris Pons wrote:
> Does D have a math library that defines, points, vectors and
> matrices including the appropriate functions(addition, dot product,
> cross product, etc)?
I'd like to know too.
I have a medium-sized D project in the works, but right now
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:28:24AM -0700, Ali Çehreli wrote:
[...]
> We are getting a little off topic here but I've been following the
> recent unit test thread about writing to files. Unit tests should not
> have external interactions like that either. For example, no test
> should connect to an
Does D have a math library that defines, points, vectors and
matrices including the appropriate functions(addition, dot
product, cross product, etc)?
I'm starting my next game and I would like to know what my
options are. I plan on using SDL, I'm not exactly into OpenGL
yet, since I'm new and
On 03/13/2012 11:49 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/13/12, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Developers wouldn't
want that to happen every time a .d file is compiled.
Well luckily unittests don't run when you compile a .d file but when
you run the app! :)
Good point. :)
Our C++ unit tests are a part of a
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 19:13:06 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 3/13/12, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> > I've completely lost track of what happened with the whole toUTF16z
> > story
>
> Btw, to!string still doesn't work with wchar* arguments. I currently
> use this hack:
>
> wstring fromUTF16z(in wc
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 15:04:09 Ary Manzana wrote:
> How can you re-run just a failing test? (without having to run all the
> previous tests that will succeed?)
You can't, not without essentially creating your own unit testing framework.
D's unit testing framework is quite simple. If you comp
On 3/13/12, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> Developers wouldn't
> want that to happen every time a .d file is compiled.
Well luckily unittests don't run when you compile a .d file but when
you run the app! :)
On 13-03-2012 19:43, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 March 2012 at 18:28:27 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
My std.uuid module doesn't compile with the latest dmd. I guess it's
because of a wrong opEquals signature, this is what I have now:
--
@safe pure nothrow bool opEquals(ref const U
On Tuesday, 13 March 2012 at 18:28:27 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
My std.uuid module doesn't compile with the latest dmd. I guess
it's
because of a wrong opEquals signature, this is what I have now:
--
@safe pure nothrow bool opEquals(ref const UUID s) const
{
return s.data == this.da
On 13-03-2012 19:28, Johannes Pfau wrote:
My std.uuid module doesn't compile with the latest dmd. I guess it's
because of a wrong opEquals signature, this is what I have now:
--
@safe pure nothrow bool opEquals(ref const UUID s) const
{
return s.data == this.data;
}
--
and
Am Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:28:26 +0100
schrieb Johannes Pfau :
> My std.uuid module doesn't compile with the latest dmd. I guess it's
> because of a wrong opEquals signature, this is what I have now:
>
> --
> @safe pure nothrow bool opEquals(ref const UUID s) const
> {
> return s.data ==
My std.uuid module doesn't compile with the latest dmd. I guess it's
because of a wrong opEquals signature, this is what I have now:
--
@safe pure nothrow bool opEquals(ref const UUID s) const
{
return s.data == this.data;
}
--
and
--
assert(UUID("---0
On 03/13/2012 11:04 AM, Ary Manzana wrote:
> On 3/13/12 2:21 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> On 03/09/2012 06:20 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>>
>> > The same story goes for unittests which can't be independently
>> > ran to get a list of all failing unittests
>>
>> D unittest blocks are for code correctn
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 19:00:29 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> I've completely lost track of what happened with the whole toUTF16z
> story, but anyway since it's in std.utf why doesn't it just forward to
> toUTFz?
There's a pull request which includes other changes to std.utf which has been
sitting
On 3/13/12, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> I've completely lost track of what happened with the whole toUTF16z
> story
Btw, to!string still doesn't work with wchar* arguments. I currently
use this hack:
wstring fromUTF16z(in wchar* s)
{
if (s is null) return null;
wchar* ptr;
for (ptr = ca
On 3/13/12 2:21 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/09/2012 06:20 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> The same story goes for unittests which can't be independently
> ran to get a list of all failing unittests
D unittest blocks are for code correctness (as opposed to other meanings
of the unfortunately ove
I've completely lost track of what happened with the whole toUTF16z
story, but anyway since it's in std.utf why doesn't it just forward to
toUTFz?
const(wchar)* toUTF16z(T)(T input)
if (isSomeString!T)
{
return toUTFz!(const(wchar)*)(input);
}
That way it can take any string argument and
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:13:23 Magnus Lie Hetland wrote:
> On 2012-03-12 17:24:56 +, Jonathan M Davis said:
> > The problem is that sort requires a random access range, and narrow string
> > (string and wstring) aren't, because they're variable length encoded. I'm
> > not sure that strings
On 03/09/2012 06:20 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> The same story goes for unittests which can't be independently
> ran to get a list of all failing unittests
D unittest blocks are for code correctness (as opposed to other meanings
of the unfortunately overused term "unit testing" e.g. the functi
Boy its really hard to navigate this forum for an old thread.
Seems like a lot has changed in D since this thread. Here is the
correct snippet if someone comes searching for "error: undefined
identifier splitter" like me :) (using DMD64 D Compiler v2.058)
import std.stdio, std.string, std.algo
On 2012-03-13 14:24:37 +, H. S. Teoh said:
Indeed. Would've thought const AA keys would be reasonable. (In
Python they're *required*... :)
[...]
I'm of the opinion that AA keys should be *implicitly* immutable.
Seconded, whole-heartedly.
--
Magnus Lie Hetland
http://hetland.org
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:02:02AM +0100, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote:
> On 2012-03-13 02:27:46 +, Simen Kjærås said:
>
> >Weird.
>
> Indeed. Would've thought const AA keys would be reasonable. (In
> Python they're *required*... :)
[...]
I'm of the opinion that AA keys should be *implicitly* im
On 2012-03-12 17:33:35 +, Ali Çehreli said:
You can use isNarrowString to either disallow or provide special
implementation for narrow strings (char[] and wchar[]):
Ah -- useful, thanks!
--
Magnus Lie Hetland
http://hetland.org
On 2012-03-12 17:24:56 +, Jonathan M Davis said:
The problem is that sort requires a random access range, and narrow string
(string and wstring) aren't, because they're variable length encoded. I'm not
sure that strings _can_ be efficiently sorted, because of that, but maybe
there's a sortin
On 2012-03-13 02:27:46 +, Simen Kjærås said:
Weird.
Indeed. Would've thought const AA keys would be reasonable. (In Python
they're *required*... :)
You get a different error message from what I get.
My reduced code:
[snip]
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7695
I guess
57 matches
Mail list logo
