On 07.04.2012 8:51, ReneSac wrote:
On Friday, 6 April 2012 at 01:33:10 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DMD runs just fine on 64-bit Windows.
Then why "32 bit Windows (Win32) operating system, such as Windows XP"
is put as a requirement? This should be corrected:
http://dlang.org/dmd-windows.html
Anywa
On Friday, 6 April 2012 at 01:33:10 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DMD runs just fine on 64-bit Windows.
Then why "32 bit Windows (Win32) operating system, such as
Windows XP" is put as a requirement? This should be corrected:
http://dlang.org/dmd-windows.html
Anyway, in the mean time I have setup G
On Friday, 6 April 2012 at 15:28:38 UTC, Paul wrote:
I was reading a wiki about D and it talked about Tango vs.
Phobos. I read some items on runtime vs. standard libraries as
well. I am bit confused about all of it. Are the standard
libraries compiled into every exe and then the runtimes lin
Paul:
I was reading a wiki about D and it talked about Tango vs.
Phobos. I read some items on runtime vs. standard libraries as
well. I am bit confused about all of it. Are the standard
libraries compiled into every exe and then the runtimes linked
as needed? Are they all or nothing entit
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 05:28:37PM +0200, Paul wrote:
> I was reading a wiki about D and it talked about Tango vs. Phobos. I
> read some items on runtime vs. standard libraries as well. I am bit
> confused about all of it. Are the standard libraries compiled into
> every exe and then the runtime
On Friday, 6 April 2012 at 15:18:35 UTC, Paul wrote:
I would like to start writing little Win GUI utilities. I
really want to stick with single .exeS that I can carry around
on a jump drive and don't have to install. Is D developed
enough, with various libraries and documentation to do this?
I was reading a wiki about D and it talked about Tango vs.
Phobos. I read some items on runtime vs. standard libraries as
well. I am bit confused about all of it. Are the standard
libraries compiled into every exe and then the runtimes linked as
needed? Are they all or nothing entities? In
I would like to start writing little Win GUI utilities. I really
want to stick with single .exeS that I can carry around on a jump
drive and don't have to install. Is D developed enough, with
various libraries and documentation to do this? If there are
still a lot of bugs and gotcha's maybe
On Friday, April 06, 2012 09:34:10 Minas wrote:
> Thank you, that made it run 300ms faster than the C version!
> Could this be a bug in dmd that I should report?
A bug? I don't think so. Something that the optimizer could do better?
Absolutely. The code is perfectly correct. It's just that the op
On Thursday, 5 April 2012 at 23:23:54 UTC, Kapps wrote:
On Thursday, 5 April 2012 at 17:22:38 UTC, Minas wrote:
First, you should compile with -O -release -inline and, in this
case, -noboundscheck.
return false;
Results in a 26 times performance increase for me, based off of
u
10 matches
Mail list logo
