On 07/11/2012 07:50 PM, cal wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 July 2012 at 23:18:25 UTC, cal wrote:
I'm using the deimos libX11 bindings, DMD 2.058 OpenSUSE x86_64.
In Xlibint.d, my linker can't resolve '_XData16' (it's proto is on
line 624 of Xlibint).
Does anyone who knows X11 know what library I
Do the getMembers() and offTi() functions of TypeInfo_Class already
work? If yes who generates the information for them, or do I have to do
that manually with a template? Are there any examples on this? I
couldn't find anything in the documentation.
Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut
On 15-07-2012 15:43, Alexandr Druzhinin wrote:
Hello,
I need something like that -
http://digitalmars.com/techtips/class_objects.html, but more portable. I
saw it sometime ago, but now can not find anything.
Could someone help me.
This is how you do it in modern D:
import core.stdc.stdlib,
15.07.2012 20:50, Alex Rønne Petersen пишет:
This is how you do it in modern D:
import core.stdc.stdlib, std.conv;
class A {}
void main()
{
// allocate and initialize
auto size = __traits(classInstanceSize, A);
auto mem = malloc(size)[0 .. size];
auto a = emplace!A(mem);
On 15-07-2012 16:46, Alexandr Druzhinin wrote:
15.07.2012 20:50, Alex Rønne Petersen пишет:
This is how you do it in modern D:
import core.stdc.stdlib, std.conv;
class A {}
void main()
{
// allocate and initialize
auto size = __traits(classInstanceSize, A);
auto mem =
15.07.2012 22:03, Alex Rønne Petersen пишет:
You pass those after the 'mem' argument to emplace. So, for example:
auto a = emplace!A(mem, foo, bar, 'b', 'a', 'z');
thanks for your help!
On 15-07-2012 17:31, Alexandr Druzhinin wrote:
I make simple learning project and encounter the problem that when my
application exits I get access violations (yes, I use windows and
moreover - XP version :) ). I don't know the reason of errors, I'm sure
that exceptions are thrown by runtime,
I make simple learning project and encounter the problem that when my
application exits I get access violations (yes, I use windows and
moreover - XP version :) ). I don't know the reason of errors, I'm sure
that exceptions are thrown by runtime, not my code directly - its occurs
right
15.07.2012 22:33, Alex Rønne Petersen пишет:
It's really, really hard to say what's wrong from this information. You
need to post some reduced test case demonstrating the problem.
You're right, it's really hard. But I'd like to learn about using GC only.
Of course I'll try to reduce my
15.07.2012 22:33, Alex Rønne Petersen пишет:
test case:
class A {
}
__gshared A a;
void main(string[] args) {
a = new A;
}
every time after finishing application I get
core.exception.InvalidMemoryOperationError
I suspect the problem is misusing __gshared
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 05:30:55 Jay Norwood wrote:
I see from this other discussions that it looks like 2.059 ( or
maybe 2.060) does support something like 3.cm(). Not sure from
the discussion if it would also accept 3.cm as in the xtext/xtend
example.
Hi Jay,
I had a little fun
On 07/15/2012 05:40 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 05:30:55 Jay Norwood wrote:
I see from this other discussions that it looks like 2.059 ( or
maybe 2.060) does support something like 3.cm(). Not sure from
the discussion if it would also accept 3.cm as in the xtext/xtend
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 19:50:18 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/15/2012 05:40 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 05:30:55 Jay Norwood wrote:
I see from this other discussions that it looks like 2.059 ( or
maybe 2.060) does support something like 3.cm(). Not sure from
the
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 18:34:44 bearophile wrote:
Alex Rønne Petersen:
This is how you do it in modern D:
This seems fiddly and bug-prone (and eventually fit to go in the
D FAQ).
Maybe it needs to use an aligned_malloc, to avoid aligning
troubles in the class.
It'll probably become
Am 15.07.2012 21:06, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 18:34:44 bearophile wrote:
Alex Rønne Petersen:
This is how you do it in modern D:
This seems fiddly and bug-prone (and eventually fit to go in the
D FAQ).
Maybe it needs to use an aligned_malloc, to avoid aligning
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 11:56:57 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
What is enforced here? Why would it matter if anything is 'enforced'?
If you marked it as a property, then it's supposed to be abstracting a
variable and should be treated as one, just like if it's a normal function,
it should be
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 21:14:40 Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Am 15.07.2012 21:06, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 18:34:44 bearophile wrote:
Alex Rønne Petersen:
This is how you do it in modern D:
This seems fiddly and bug-prone (and eventually fit to go in the
D FAQ).
On 07/15/2012 09:41 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 11:56:57 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
What is enforced here? Why would it matter if anything is 'enforced'?
If you marked it as a property, then it's supposed to be abstracting a
variable and should be treated as one, just
On 07/15/2012 08:56 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 19:50:18 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/15/2012 05:40 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 05:30:55 Jay Norwood wrote:
I see from this other discussions that it looks like 2.059 ( or
maybe 2.060) does support
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 23:29:04 Timon Gehr wrote:
The current plan is (and has been for some time)
that -property will become the normal behavior,
It is obvious that -property is broken and will not become the normal
behaviour.
It is obvious that -property needs to be fixed before it
On 07/15/2012 11:11 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
There are two levels to enforcement. Neither exist without -property. The
absolutely minimal level is that anything marked with @property must be used
as a property. Without this, you can't swap out a property function for a
variable without
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 23:35:12 Timon Gehr wrote:
The second level - i.e. strict property enforcement - also requires that
non- property functions be called as functions.
Exactly. This part is useless.
And there, we will forever disagree.
- Jonathan M Davis
On 07/15/2012 11:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 23:35:12 Timon Gehr wrote:
The second level - i.e. strict property enforcement - also requires that
non- property functions be called as functions.
Exactly. This part is useless.
And there, we will forever disagree.
On 07/15/2012 11:35 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 23:29:04 Timon Gehr wrote:
The current plan is (and has been for some time)
that -property will become the normal behavior,
It is obvious that -property is broken and will not become the normal
behaviour.
It is obvious
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 23:47:58 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/15/2012 11:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 23:35:12 Timon Gehr wrote:
The second level - i.e. strict property enforcement - also requires that
non- property functions be called as functions.
Exactly. This
On 07/15/2012 11:56 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 23:47:58 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/15/2012 11:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 23:35:12 Timon Gehr wrote:
The second level - i.e. strict property enforcement - also requires that
non- property
Is something like this possible?
Foo* create_ptr(Foo f) {
assert(f !is null);
// ...
}
Foo* fp = create_ptr(new Foo());
with ref Foo f of course, there is no limitation.
On Monday, July 16, 2012 00:47:27 Namespace wrote:
Is something like this possible?
Foo* create_ptr(Foo f) {
assert(f !is null);
// ...
}
Foo* fp = create_ptr(new Foo());
with ref Foo f of course, there is no limitation.
You cannot have pointers to classes. The language
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
writeln(typeid(Test!int));
}
template Test(T...)
{
alias immutable(T[0]) Test;
}
This prints int instead of immutable(int) like I would
expect. Is this a bug, or is that what is supposed to happen?
On Monday, July 16, 2012 01:38:05 Nick Gurrola wrote:
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
writeln(typeid(Test!int));
}
template Test(T...)
{
alias immutable(T[0]) Test;
}
It looks like a bug to me.
- Jonathan M Davis
On 7/16/2012 1:01 AM, Alexandr Druzhinin wrote:
15.07.2012 22:56, Alexandr Druzhinin пишет:
15.07.2012 22:33, Alex Rønne Petersen пишет:
test case:
class A {
}
__gshared A a;
void main(string[] args) {
a = new A;
}
every time after finishing application I get
On 07/15/2012 09:01 AM, Alexandr Druzhinin wrote:
15.07.2012 22:56, Alexandr Druzhinin пишет:
15.07.2012 22:33, Alex Rønne Petersen пишет:
test case:
class A {
}
__gshared A a;
void main(string[] args) {
a = new A;
}
every time after finishing application I get
32 matches
Mail list logo
