Al 13/10/12 02:10, En/na Andrej Mitrovic ha escrit:
> For example:
>
> $ dmd -H -o- atk/Action.d gio/DBusProxy.d -Hdinclude
>
> Both files are written to the 'include' folder but they're flat
> because the original folder structure is lost. So instead of having:
>
> include/atk/Action.d
> includ
On 10/13/2012 04:22 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
...
// PROBLEM #1: due to PROBLEM #1, this causes an
// infinite recursion that eventually overflows
// the stack.
...
I'm sure it does :).
@topic: yes this is a bug.
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 05:00:40AM +0200, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 10/13/12, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > This seems to be a compiler bug to me?
>
> Has to be: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/89a646b7
OK, filed an issue for it:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8809
T
--
Laissez-faire
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 04:35:12AM +0200, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 10/13/12, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > The problem is, I can't seem to specify that I want it to _statically_
> > bind the save method to call B.eval;
>
> Try using typeof(this).eval
>
> typeof(this) and typeof(super) are mentioned h
On 10/13/12, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> The problem is, I can't seem to specify that I want it to _statically_
> bind the save method to call B.eval;
Try using typeof(this).eval
typeof(this) and typeof(super) are mentioned here:
http://dlang.org/declaration.html#typeof
http://dlang.org/expression.html
Today I ran into a bit of a bind. I have a class hierarchy in which a
base class B defines a method eval, which returns a forward range struct
whose save method consists of a delegate that simply re-invokes eval
with the same arguments. Then there's a derived class C, which overrides
B.eval, but us
On 10/13/12, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> I didn't find an open bug report on this, but I think this is worthy
> of an enhancement request.
And writing header files one at a time is incredibly slow because DMD
parses every import on each header generation.
On 10/13/12, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 10/13/12, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>> I didn't find an open bug report on this, but I think this is worthy
>> of an enhancement request.
>
> And writing header files one at a time is incredibly slow because DMD
> parses every import on each header generation
For example:
$ dmd -H -o- atk/Action.d gio/DBusProxy.d -Hdinclude
Both files are written to the 'include' folder but they're flat
because the original folder structure is lost. So instead of having:
include/atk/Action.d
include/gio/DBusProxy.d
I have:
include/Action.d
include/DBusProxy.d
The f
On Oct 12, 2012, at 10:18 AM, denizzzka <4deni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for answer!
>
> After investigation came to the conclusion that here is needed not
> synchronized-based solution. I am need compare-and-swap single linked list
> because it will be used in callback proc from C, and it
On Oct 12, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Chopin wrote:
>
> I got this 109 MB json file that I read... and it takes over 32
> seconds for parseJSON() to finish it. So I was wondering if it
> was a way to save it as binary or something like that so I can
> read it super fast?
The performance problem is becaus
On Friday, October 12, 2012 23:10:47 Dan wrote:
> What is best way to get equivalent of C++ private inheritance
> combined with using declarations in the drived to expose some
> functionality. For example, suppose I want a basic RateCurve
> class that defers almost entirely to type Array as below.
What is best way to get equivalent of C++ private inheritance
combined with using declarations in the drived to expose some
functionality. For example, suppose I want a basic RateCurve
class that defers almost entirely to type Array as below. The
problem is, once RateCurve is moved to a differe
I really don't know where to ask that, I hope you can help me :).
Is it possible to use an import lib generated with implib on 32bit on a
64bit machine? And if so, is it also possible to have dlls which work
for 32 and 64bit?
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:18:31 +0200
"Jonathan M Davis" wrote:
> On Thursday, October 11, 2012 18:45:36 Rizo Isrof wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Why the `in` expression can only be applied to associative
> > arrays and cannot be used with static or dynamic arrays as
> > it is possible with, _e.g._, Pytho
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:51:02 +0200
Lubos Pintes wrote:
> Hi,
> I am still playing with DGUI library. Besides other things, I would
> like to convert enum names from
> "THIS_STUPID_NAMING_CONVENTION_WHICH_I_ABSOLUTELY_HATE" to
> "thisGoodOne". Obviously I could do this by hand but it is a bit tim
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:51:02 +0200, Lubos Pintes
wrote:
Hi,
I am still playing with DGUI library. Besides other things, I would like
to convert enum names from
"THIS_STUPID_NAMING_CONVENTION_WHICH_I_ABSOLUTELY_HATE" to "thisGoodOne".
Obviously I could do this by hand but it is a bit time co
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:30:11 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I liked the style that the Tango docs are using much better.
What? You don't like my soft, green colours? Shame on you! :P
Ok, I'm not happy with the style myself, but I want to concentrate on
functionality more atm.
Jonathan M Davis:
Because that would mean than in was O(n), whereas it's
generally assumed to be
at least o(log n) (which is what you'd get in a balanced binary
tree such as
red-black tree). AA's do it in O(1), so they're okay, but
dynamic arrays can't do better than O(n).
Time ago the built
I would be grateful if someone share singly linked list based
on cas()
Ok, this is a good opportunity to learn how to write such by
oneself :-)
Hi,
I am still playing with DGUI library. Besides other things, I would like
to convert enum names from
"THIS_STUPID_NAMING_CONVENTION_WHICH_I_ABSOLUTELY_HATE" to "thisGoodOne".
Obviously I could do this by hand but it is a bit time consuming. Any
tool / hack to help me with this?
Thank
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:06:16 -0400, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
std.stdio has a nice struct called LockingTextReader in the source. The
thing is it isn't documented at all, and I don't think it even does its
own interface.
It claims to return dchars, but apparently reads bytes.
Its counterpart
Chopin wrote:
Thanks! I tried using it:
auto document = parseJSON(content).array; // this works with std.json :)
Using json.d from the link:
auto j = JSONReader!string(content);
auto document = j.value.whole.array; // this doesn't "Error:
undefined identifier 'array'"
If you're sure that
Thanks! I tried using it:
auto document = parseJSON(content).array; // this works with
std.json :)
Using json.d from the link:
auto j = JSONReader!string(content);
auto document = j.value.whole.array; // this doesn't "Error:
undefined identifier 'array'"
Thanks for answer!
After investigation came to the conclusion that here is needed
not synchronized-based solution. I am need compare-and-swap
single linked list because it will be used in callback proc from
C, and it cannot be throwable, but synchronized contains
throwable _d_monitorenter and
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 18:45:36 Rizo Isrof wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why the `in` expression can only be applied to associative
> arrays and cannot be used with static or dynamic arrays as
> it is possible with, _e.g._, Python?
>
> The following code is not legal:
>
> int[] a = [1,2,3,4,5];
>
Hi,
Why the `in` expression can only be applied to associative
arrays and cannot be used with static or dynamic arrays as
it is possible with, _e.g._, Python?
The following code is not legal:
int[] a = [1,2,3,4,5];
if (1 in a) { }
Are there any technical explanation for this limitation
std.stdio has a nice struct called LockingTextReader in the
source. The thing is it isn't documented at all, and I don't
think it even does its own interface.
It claims to return dchars, but apparently reads bytes.
Its counterpart, LockingTextWriter, seems to do a little more
dchar related st
On Friday, October 12, 2012 14:59:56 denizzzka wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Specifically, pushBack(x) and moveFront() operations should be a
> thread safe.
Not in Phobos. No containers in Phobos contain any kind of synchronization.
The same goes for the built-in array types. If any of them are shared, you'l
Chopin wrote:
Hello!
I got this 109 MB json file that I read... and it takes over 32
seconds for parseJSON() to finish it. So I was wondering if it
was a way to save it as binary or something like that so I can
read it super fast?
Thanks for all suggestions :)
Try this implementation:
https:
Hello!
I got this 109 MB json file that I read... and it takes over 32
seconds for parseJSON() to finish it. So I was wondering if it
was a way to save it as binary or something like that so I can
read it super fast?
Thanks for all suggestions :)
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:16:54 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Why is that? Tango is working just fine and Phobos is still missing some
stuff that Tango has. Actually, I'm using both and there's nothing wrong
with that. Tango is just yet another third party library.
Yeah, no disagreement ther
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:19:23 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Have a look at this documentation of submodules:
http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Submodules
Be sure to point submodules to a public address.
That was a good read, but unfortunately it deterred me from using
submodules. Sounds
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 at 18:08:47 UTC, Aziz K. wrote:
I'll be happy to help you compile DIL yourself. That way I can
see where my assumptions are false and my instructions are
lacking and make it work for different platforms and needs.
I've been considering just copying Tango's files to
or dynamic array with this methods
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 20:30 -0700, Charles Hixson wrote:
[…]
> I'm not clear on what Fibers are. From Ruby they seem to mean
> co-routines, and that doesn't have much advantage. But it also seems as
[…]
I think the emerging consensus is that threads allow for pre-emptive
scheduling whereas fib
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 at 14:26:54 UTC, Dan wrote:
Also, pointers to any doc generation setup with decent styling
that works out of the box would be great.
bootDoc[1] uses Twitter's Bootstrap theme for styling, and has a
lot of extra features implemented with JavaScript. It works right
37 matches
Mail list logo
