On Tuesday, 14 June 2016 at 03:40:01 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 June 2016 at 03:15:04 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
It actually is a free function
no, it isn't, it is on File.
Your code doesn't compile on my dmd (and indeed it shouldn't on
yours either unless you have a version
On Tuesday, 14 June 2016 at 03:15:04 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
It actually is a free function
no, it isn't, it is on File.
Your code doesn't compile on my dmd (and indeed it shouldn't on
yours either unless you have a version mismatch. rdmd just calls
dmd, it doesn't produce its own
On Tuesday, 14 June 2016 at 01:35:32 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 June 2016 at 01:05:46 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
This code doesn't seem to work with rdmd. Is this a bug?
import std.stdio : byLine;
int main(string[] args)
{
foreach(line; stdin.byLine) {
}
This code doesn't seem to work with rdmd. Is this a bug?
import std.stdio : byLine;
int main(string[] args)
{
foreach(line; stdin.byLine) {
}
return 0;
}
Compiler Output:
Error: module std.stdio import 'byLine' not found
I'm writing a custom (originally multi-dimensional) Slice-type,
analogous to the builtin T[], and stumbled upon the problem that
the following code won't compile. The workaround is simple: just
write the function three times for mutable/const/immutable. But
as "inout" was invented to make that
I made a small (could be reduced further) example that creates and walks
a templated binary tree. The tree also gets a factory function to use
type deduction to conveniently construct a tree. Unfortunately this does
not compile, if I remove the three ugly methods between /* these should
go */
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 14:16:58 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
So returning a reference to something on the stack is a bad
idea, but copying the value would be fine.
This is easy enough to get wrong elsewhere too. I recall having
an issue with a foreach, until I added a 'ref' to it. Looking at
the
On Sunday, 12 June 2016 at 01:39:11 UTC, Joerg Joergonson wrote:
This doesn't seem to be the case though in more complex
examples ;/
it is.
My code is almost identical do what you have written
your code is *completely* different. that's why there are no
traces of CTFE values in my sample.
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 16:46:38 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 12 June 2016 at 14:22:54 UTC, Joerg Joergonson wrote:
Error: undefined identifier 'Sleep' in module 'core.thread',
did you mean function 'Sleep'?
It is supposed to be `Thread.sleep(1.seconds);`
I'm pretty sure the
On 2016-06-13 17:00, Basile B. wrote:
Unless It's you Jacob who have proposed Orange to phobos in 2012. And
then since refused it's not developed at all. IIRC it's even not
possible to compile it with DUB.
Yes, I've written Orange and proposed it to Phobos. Not sure what you
mean with
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 19:11:59 UTC, John wrote:
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 17:38:41 UTC, Incognito wrote:
Cool. Oleview gives me the idl files. How to convert the idl
files to d or possibly c?
Would I just use them in place of IUnknown once I have the
interface?
In OleView you can
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 17:38:41 UTC, Incognito wrote:
Cool. Oleview gives me the idl files. How to convert the idl
files to d or possibly c?
Would I just use them in place of IUnknown once I have the
interface?
In OleView you can save the IDL file, then run another tool,
midl.exe, on
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 04:20:38 UTC, Joerg Joergonson wrote:
BTW I make your code a bit better with resizing
case WM_SIZING:
goto size_changed;
break;
I left that out intentionally because it lagged on my computer...
so I wanted it to stay blank.
Maybe it can be made more
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 07:40:09 UTC, John wrote:
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 01:22:33 UTC, Incognito wrote:
I've been reading over D's com and can't find anything useful.
It seems there are different ways:
http://www.lunesu.com/uploads/ModernCOMProgramminginD.pdf
which is of no help and
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 15:00:06 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 14:30:13 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 11:27:31 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-06-13 09:54, Pierre wrote:
Thank you i will try it.
You don't need to involve the constructor. You can
On Sunday, 12 June 2016 at 14:22:54 UTC, Joerg Joergonson wrote:
Error: undefined identifier 'Sleep' in module 'core.thread',
did you mean function 'Sleep'?
It is supposed to be `Thread.sleep(1.seconds);`
I'm pretty sure the capital Sleep() is supposed to be private
(that is the
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 14:30:13 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 11:27:31 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-06-13 09:54, Pierre wrote:
Thank you i will try it.
You don't need to involve the constructor. You can use
.tupleof, as I mentioned [1] [2].
[1]
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 11:27:31 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-06-13 09:54, Pierre wrote:
Thank you i will try it.
You don't need to involve the constructor. You can use
.tupleof, as I mentioned [1] [2].
[1] http://forum.dlang.org/post/njlohq$1n99$1...@digitalmars.com
[2]
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 01:41:07 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Everything works fine in your example because 'new' always
allocates on the heap. Anything allocated on the stack is not
guaranteed to be valid after the scope exits:
struct Foo
{
int baz;
~this() { baz = 1; }
}
void
On 2016-06-13 09:54, Pierre wrote:
Thank you i will try it.
You don't need to involve the constructor. You can use .tupleof, as I
mentioned [1] [2].
[1] http://forum.dlang.org/post/njlohq$1n99$1...@digitalmars.com
[2] http://forum.dlang.org/post/njlop0$1ngk$1...@digitalmars.com
--
/Jacob
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 07:53:08 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-06-13 09:49, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
For fields, used .tupleof, for other symbols, use a pointer.
Here's an example [1] of accessing a field using the name of
the field as a string. It will bypass private.
That module
On 2016-06-13 09:49, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
For fields, used .tupleof, for other symbols, use a pointer.
Here's an example [1] of accessing a field using the name of the field
as a string. It will bypass private.
That module [1] contains some generic functionality for working with
fields
Thank you i will try it.
On 2016-06-13 09:43, Pierre wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know how can i access private member of class from
outside ?
I think about serialization for instance, serializer must have access to
protected attributes. How this is done ?
Thank you.
For fields, used .tupleof, for other symbols, use a
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 07:43:09 UTC, Pierre wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know how can i access private member of class
from outside ?
I think about serialization for instance, serializer must have
access to protected attributes. How this is done ?
Thank you.
You can perform the
Hi,
I would like to know how can i access private member of class
from outside ?
I think about serialization for instance, serializer must have
access to protected attributes. How this is done ?
Thank you.
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 01:22:33 UTC, Incognito wrote:
I've been reading over D's com and can't find anything useful.
It seems there are different ways:
http://www.lunesu.com/uploads/ModernCOMProgramminginD.pdf
which is of no help and requires an idl file, which I don't
have.
Then
On Monday, 13 June 2016 at 00:57:11 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
This is misleading. Any sort of cooperative system needs
synchronization when two or more tasks try to access the same
data, whether those "tasks" are OS threads, fibers, different
machines on a network, etc.
That is true. Sorry.
28 matches
Mail list logo
