On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 at 07:41:29 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
test.naturalSort would sort the array in place before calling
writeln and 'test' would appear naturally sorted as well. I've
fixed it like this:
Great! Thank you!
On 02/06/2017 09:00 PM, Dmitry wrote:
> On Monday, 6 February 2017 at 18:57:17 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> I think it's now std.algorithm.chunkBy. Please fix Rosetta
>
> Thank you!
> I fixed
Thank you!
> but anyway it works incorrect (it doesn't any changes):
The problem was with the following
On 02/07/2017 01:17 AM, Chris Katko wrote:
void function3(T)(T) //hypothetical, specify the datatype in the
argument list
{
T data;
}
Related:
https://dlang.org/library/object/type_info.html
and
https://dlang.org/library/object/object.factory.html
This compiles but I'm not
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 at 21:40:04 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 at 10:21:20 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
function2!float(); //?
function3!float(); //?
Yes, this is how it's done.
Not quite with function3, because it takes one unnamed runtime
parameter. It can be
On 02/07/2017 02:04 PM, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
>> This optimization cannot work if the array is a static array inside
>> the same struct. It would work with a dynamic array but then it would
>> probably be slower than applying the *(ptr+index) technique.
>
> You mean slower than the
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 at 20:33:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 02/07/2017 02:11 AM, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
> We do not need to take measures against the GC?
Of course we have to and the struct that I wrote is illegal
because it is self-referencing through the _ptr member. (D has
the right
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 at 09:21:18 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Can't find a reason why it's not inferred @safe (on linux). Any
idea?
Perhaps you are trying to read as a type for which a conversion
from string to it is @system? Not sure if that's possible.
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 at 10:21:20 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
function2!float(); //?
function3!float(); //?
Yes, this is how it's done.
Not quite with function3, because it takes one unnamed runtime
parameter. It can be called like function1 however. The value of
the parameter
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 at 20:28:30 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
You forgot to call that most important function. ;)
Hah of course. I assumed the name would give it some special
meaning, like postblit.
1) I don't understand the first assert there, which does not
pass for me, so I commented
Pressed send too soon, before considering your GC question.
On 02/07/2017 02:11 AM, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
> We do not need to take measures against the GC?
Of course we have to and the struct that I wrote is illegal because it
is self-referencing through the _ptr member. (D has the right to
On 02/07/2017 02:11 AM, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
> void init() {
> assert( first < cast(size_t)_payload.ptr); //
> Address space underrun.
> assert(-first < size_t.max - cast(size_t)_payload.ptr); //
> Address space overrun.
> this._ptr = _payload.ptr -
auto arr = uninitializedArray!(int[][])(ROWS,COLS);
arr.each!"a[]=-1";
This looks like what I was looking for. At least I think I
understand what's going on here. The other two suggestions are
beyond my scope yet, but I'll come back, when I improved on my D
skills. Thanks for your replies.
On Sunday, 5 February 2017 at 20:33:06 UTC, berni wrote:
With X not known at compile time:
auto arr = new int[][](X,X);
for (int i=0;i
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 at 13:37:01 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Here still example
https://pp.vk.me/c636630/v636630885/46579/neSdIip1ySI.jpg
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 at 13:37:01 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 at 10:46:24 UTC, kinke wrote:
I've only every done trivial C++ integration before. As soon as
I tried something "real" it all broke down incredibly fast.
Probably going to have to file some bugs on
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 at 10:46:24 UTC, kinke wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 at 10:15:09 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I can declare a C++ struct like so:
extern(C++, mynamespace)
struct Foo {
//...
}
But... I don't want to repeat the initialisation code for that
struct's default
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 at 10:15:09 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I can declare a C++ struct like so:
extern(C++, mynamespace)
struct Foo {
//...
}
But... I don't want to repeat the initialisation code for that
struct's default constructor. I can't declare one in D because
D doesn't allow
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 at 09:17:04 UTC, Chris Katko wrote:
Can I pass a type, instead of a variable of a type, to a
template function in order to decide the datatype of T in a
function?
Yes. That's rather the point.
function1(f); //works
That is actually shorthand for this:
I can declare a C++ struct like so:
extern(C++, mynamespace)
struct Foo {
//...
}
But... I don't want to repeat the initialisation code for that
struct's default constructor. I can't declare one in D because D
doesn't allow default constructors for structs. What's my way
out? Thanks,
On Monday, 6 February 2017 at 23:42:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Then you use _ptr when indexing:
// Support e = arr[5];
ref T opIndex(ptrdiff_t index) {
assert(index >= first);
assert(index <= last);
return *(_ptr + index);
}
Ali
Thank you very much for
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017 at 09:21:18 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Can't find a reason why it's not inferred @safe (on linux). Any
idea?
Uh ? It's safe
Just tried
import std.stdio;
void main(string[] args) @safe
{
File f;
ubyte[] z;
z = f.rawRead(z);
}
And it compiles (DMD
Can't find a reason why it's not inferred @safe (on linux). Any
idea?
Can I pass a type, instead of a variable of a type, to a template
function in order to decide the datatype of T in a function?
void function(T)(T x) //works
{
T data;
//do stuff with T, ignoring x.
}
void function2(T)() //hypothetical, specify the type... somehow?
{
T
23 matches
Mail list logo