Hello,
What's the difference between x = Nullable!Test.init and
x.nullify?
class Test{}
void test()pure nothrow{
Nullable!Test x;
x = Nullable!Test.init; //OK
x.nullify; //Error: function
'std.typecons.Nullable!(Test).Nullable.nullify!().nullify' is not
nothrow
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 16:08:20 UTC, Zz wrote:
Hi,
Just tried migrating from std.experimental.ndslice to
mir-algorithm.
Is there a guide on how migrate old code?
I used the following imports before and using then with ndslice.
import std.experimental.ndslice;
import std.algorithm :
On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 20:47 +, Mike B Johnson via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> […]
>
> Would you mind, when you get some time, to write up a more
> detailed analysis of the problems you had to overcome to get it
> to work? Possibly we could get some type of library solution that
> just
On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 12:27 +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 09:39:51 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> > With D and Go, both of which claim compilation so fast you do
> > not notice:
>
> 1. Edit
> 2. run rdmd
>
There is no rdmd on Fedora Rawhide.
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 20:47:31 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:
Would you mind, when you get some time, to write up a more
detailed analysis of the problems you had to overcome to get it
to work? Possibly we could get some type of library solution
that just "works" with very little change and
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 23:34:14 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
You've probably seen H. S. Teoh's answer but still... :)
...
Ali
Awesome, thanks everyone!
You've probably seen H. S. Teoh's answer but still... :)
On 06/02/2017 04:05 PM, Mark wrote:
> Am I supposed to write template Struct(T) { class Stack { ... } }?
Not necessary because in this case it's the same thing as
class Stack(T) {
// Don't templatize functions in here (in general)
}
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:05:43PM +, Mark via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> Stefan, what do you mean that it must be a template?
>
> Am I supposed to write template Struct(T) { class Stack { ... } }?
No, he means to turn class Stack into a template by adding a template
parameter to it,
Awesome. That worked.
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 22:30:28 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 22:21:07 UTC, Mark wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to make a class that can accept any type as an
argument.
[...]
the stack class needs to be a template as well.
This is not java ;)
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 10:21:07PM +, Mark via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to make a class that can accept any type as an argument.
>
> Here is the class:
>
>
> import std.container: SList;
>
>
> class Stack {
>
> private SList!T list;
> private int _size;
>
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 22:21:07 UTC, Mark wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to make a class that can accept any type as an
argument.
[...]
the stack class needs to be a template as well.
This is not java ;)
Hello,
I am trying to make a class that can accept any type as an
argument.
Here is the class:
import std.container: SList;
class Stack {
private SList!T list;
private int _size;
this(T)() {
list = SList!T;
_size = 0;
}
public void push(T)(T item) {
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 12:19:48 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 11:09:05 UTC, aberba wrote:
1. Get shared libs to work in D (the best approach for all D
code)
I have done very little with this myself but other people have
so it is doable.
1. some kind of embeddable
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 23:24:13 UTC, aberba wrote:
Want to create and load plugins written in D into a D app at
run-time, the kind that can make api calls or extended main app
with other functionality.
I'm currently interested in it for a vibe.d app. How does these
stuff work?
Plugin
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 15:55:53 UTC, Lewis wrote:
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 02:06:27 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:
I wonder if it is possible to somehow turn D in to a scripting
language that can be run inside D?
On a game project I'm working on at home, I've done:
- Hot reloading via a DLL
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 17:50:30 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 05:22:20PM +, Stefan Koch via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 16:13:03 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
> [...]
No there is not. First it's woefully incomplete and secondly
it's tightly bound
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 17:22:20 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 16:13:03 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 02:06:27 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:
[...]
Stefan Koch has written a good part of an interpreter for D
AST, no? And I guess the lexing and parsing
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 05:22:20PM +, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 16:13:03 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
> > On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 02:06:27 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:
> > > [...]
> >
> > Stefan Koch has written a good part of an interpreter for D
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 12:00:45 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
So why is the offset off by 14h (20 bytes)? It's not like we
need a to set a ptr first.
Go figure i probably found a bug...
Well as a side note a simple yet not happy workaround is making
a new array slice of the memory and
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 08:39:07AM +0100, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 16:37 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
> >
> […]
> > With D, we can have the cake and eat it too. The understandable /
> > naïve implementation can be available as a
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 16:13:03 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 02:06:27 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:
[...]
Stefan Koch has written a good part of an interpreter for D
AST, no? And I guess the lexing and parsing stage doesn't take
so long, whereas not having to link
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 12:19:48PM +, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 11:09:05 UTC, aberba wrote:
> > 1. Get shared libs to work in D (the best approach for all D code)
>
> I have done very little with this myself but other people have so it is
>
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 02:06:27 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:
I wonder if it is possible to somehow turn D in to a scripting
language that can be run inside D?
The point? To have the same uniform syntax for quickly
developing scripts that can then be easily transferred, if
desired, in to a
Hi,
Just tried migrating from std.experimental.ndslice to
mir-algorithm.
Is there a guide on how migrate old code?
I used the following imports before and using then with ndslice.
import std.experimental.ndslice;
import std.algorithm : each, max, sort;
import std.range : iota, repeat;
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 02:06:27 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:
I wonder if it is possible to somehow turn D in to a scripting
language that can be run inside D?
On a game project I'm working on at home, I've done:
- Hot reloading via a DLL
- A build script that runs in the background, detects
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 02:06:27 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:
I wonder if it is possible to somehow turn D in to a scripting
language that can be run inside D?
The point? To have the same uniform syntax for quickly
developing scripts that can then be easily transferred, if
desired, in to a
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 13:32:02 UTC, Suliman wrote:
I remember that there was topic about remobing data from
struct/arrays of structs. But I do not remember what is
idiomatic way to do it, and can't google it.
something like:
struct MyTrack
{
ulong id;
string
I remember that there was topic about remobing data from
struct/arrays of structs. But I do not remember what is idiomatic
way to do it, and can't google it.
something like:
struct MyTrack
{
ulong id;
string recordDate;
int velocity;
int
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 13:05:41 UTC, aberba wrote:
Can source of script be reloaded at runtime?
It is just an ordinary string.
Do I have to wrap external APIs in the "global" object passed
as argument to "interpreter()"
Yes, anything the script calls must be exposed through that. It
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 12:19:48 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 11:09:05 UTC, aberba wrote:
1. Get shared libs to work in D (the best approach for all D
code)
I have done very little with this myself but other people have
so it is doable.
1. some kind of embeddable
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 09:39:51 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
With D and Go, both of which claim compilation so fast you do
not notice:
1. Edit
2. run rdmd
Especially if you only expose to the "script" in D the same
functions you'd expose to, say, a javascript script, that compile
can be
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 04:50:00 UTC, Mike B Johnson wrote:
4. Passing of the hosting D app's context. this could be pretty
hard to get right?
You'd ideally access the data through functions and shared value
types instead of loading it directly. Then you can easily do it
with shared libs
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 11:09:05 UTC, aberba wrote:
1. Get shared libs to work in D (the best approach for all D
code)
I have done very little with this myself but other people have so
it is doable.
1. some kind of embeddable interpreter for a scripting language
like (a mini js engine)
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 02:05:23 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 23:24:13 UTC, aberba wrote:
Want to create and load plugins written in D into a D app at
run-time, the kind that can make api calls or extended main
app with other functionality.
I'm currently interested
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 02:05:23 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 23:24:13 UTC, aberba wrote:
Want to create and load plugins written in D into a D app at
run-time, the kind that can make api calls or extended main
app with other functionality.
I'm currently interested
On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 02:39 +, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> […]
> The D compiler is fast enough that it will not break your flow.
>
This argument may work for you but it definitely doesn't work for me.
Using a language like Python, Groovy, Clojure, Lisp:
1. Edit
2. Run
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 07:33:05 UTC, Vasileios Anagnostopoulos
wrote:
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 17:03:52 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
[...]
But still I believe that @nothrow should be mandatory if there
is no possibility for a function to throw something. I
understand that in the DLL/LIB
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 17:03:52 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 06/01/2017 08:41 AM, Vasileios Anagnostopoulos wrote:
//If I do not know
void haveToCommunicateWithAli() {
sendEmailToAli();
}
//can blow-up after code has shipped
//and have no chance to recover
What shall I do in this case?
38 matches
Mail list logo
