On 11/12/2017 10:25 PM, Tony wrote:
>>> "Segmentation fault (core dumped)"
I've been assuming that if it says "dumped", the core is dumped.
> I am on Ubuntu 16.04. Thanks, I didn't know that "producing a core file"
> was configurable, and it appears that it isn't.
It is. If you search for
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 05:37:12 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 05:01:18 UTC, Tony wrote:
I am getting the message from my program execution:
"Segmentation fault (core dumped)"
But I don't see a core file in the current directory or in my
home directory. Is
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 05:01:18 UTC, Tony wrote:
I am getting the message from my program execution:
"Segmentation fault (core dumped)"
But I don't see a core file in the current directory or in my
home directory. Is there one somewhere? Would I be able to do
anything meaningful with
I am getting the message from my program execution:
"Segmentation fault (core dumped)"
But I don't see a core file in the current directory or in my
home directory. Is there one somewhere? Would I be able to do
anything meaningful with it if it exists?
On Friday, 25 August 2017 at 21:25:37 UTC, Enjoys Math wrote:
Something like this:
module file_watcher;
import std.concurrency;
import std.file;
import std.signals;
import std.datetime;
void fileWatcher(Tid tid, string filename, int loopSleep) {
auto modified0 =
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 21:45:56 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
But a "status change" for a reading Socket is "stuff can now
connect", for a writing one "connection established", and not
sure about the error ones. It doesn't seem to be "there's data
waiting to be read" which I'd hoped for,
On Monday, 13 November 2017 at 01:03:17 UTC, helxi wrote:
In this program, casting using to does not work as intended
(returning 23/11) on the struct. However, calling opCast
directly seems to do the job. Why is that?
to!string calls a function called `string toString() {}` on the
struct,
struct Fraction
{
private:
int numerator = 1, denominator = 1;
public:
string opCast(T : string)() const
{
import std.conv : to;
return numerator.to!string() ~ "/" ~ denominator.to!string();
}
}
void main()
{
import
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:24:08 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:20:46 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:00:58 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 21:27:28 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
I am not sure I have understood
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:00:58 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 21:27:28 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
Does the compiler generate appropriate unwind information on
Win64? Prsumably if a function is marked 'naked' then it
doesn't?
yeah about stack frame..., also don't
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:20:46 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 22:00:58 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 21:27:28 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
I am not sure I have understood above; will DMD generate the
right Win64 unwind info for this
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 21:27:28 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 18:48:02 UTC, Eugene Wissner
wrote:
https://dlang.org/spec/iasm.html#agregate_member_offsets
aggregate.member.offsetof[someregister]
Sorry I didn't phrase my question accurately. Presumably
I've been using blocking Sockets with timeouts for a while now,
but wherever I look the word is "do consider using a non-blocking
socket". Even the docs for std.socket.setOption;
In a typical application, you might also want to consider using
a non-blocking socket instead of setting a timeout
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 18:48:02 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
https://dlang.org/spec/iasm.html#agregate_member_offsets
aggregate.member.offsetof[someregister]
Sorry I didn't phrase my question accurately. Presumably to
use above with the mnemonics I would need additional mixin
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 20:41:03 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
No, the classes and structs of the examples are simply declared
as 'static' because they are located in a 'unittest' block. You
can ignore the keyword...it just means that they are declared
as if they would stand at the global
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 18:46:54 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 18:34:42 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu
wrote:
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 14:26:34 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Have anybody used allocators to construct class instances?
I might be wrong, but I think you are
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 15:25:43 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 12:32:09 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 12:17:51 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:55:23 UTC, Eugene Wissner
wrote:
[...]
Thank you - I
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 18:34:42 UTC, Eduard Staniloiu
wrote:
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 14:26:34 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Have anybody used allocators to construct class instances?
I might be wrong, but I think you are looking for
std.experimental.allocator.make [0]
[0] -
On Saturday, 11 November 2017 at 14:26:34 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Have anybody used allocators to construct class instances?
I might be wrong, but I think you are looking for
std.experimental.allocator.make [0]
[0] -
https://dlang.org/phobos/std_experimental_allocator.html#make
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 12:32:09 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 12:17:51 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:55:23 UTC, Eugene Wissner
wrote:
[...]
Thank you - I probably could use something like this. It is
uglier than the simpler
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 12:52:48 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Have anybody added logic to Emacs' `comment-dwim` that
automagically inserts a (Ddoc-style) multi-line comment like
/** ...
*/
void foo
{
}
if the cursor is currently in front of a (function) definition
(or declaration)?
I
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 12:52:48 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Have anybody added logic to Emacs' `comment-dwim` that
automagically inserts a (Ddoc-style) multi-line comment like
Posted also here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47249052/automatic-insertion-of-multiline-declaration-comments
Have anybody added logic to Emacs' `comment-dwim` that
automagically inserts a (Ddoc-style) multi-line comment like
/** ...
*/
void foo
{
}
if the cursor is currently in front of a (function) definition
(or declaration)?
I realize that the challenge here is context detection; perhaps
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 12:17:51 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:55:23 UTC, Eugene Wissner
wrote:
[...]
Thank you - I probably could use something like this. It is
uglier than the simpler approach in dynasm of course.
How about when I need to combine
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:55:23 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:01:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
I have recently started work on building a VM for Lua
(actually a derivative of Lua) in X86-64 assembly. I am using
the dynasm tool that is part of LuaJIT. I
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 12:00:00 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:01:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
[...]
The assembly code uses static allocation of registers, but
because of the differences in how registers are used in Win64
versus Unix X64 - different
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:01:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
Hi,
I have recently started work on building a VM for Lua (actually
a derivative of Lua) in X86-64 assembly. I am using the dynasm
tool that is part of LuaJIT. I was wondering whether I could
also write this in D's inline
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:01:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
Hi,
[...]
The assembly code uses static allocation of registers, but
because of the differences in how registers are used in Win64
versus Unix X64 - different registers are assigned depending on
the architecture. dynasm
On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 11:01:39 UTC, Dibyendu Majumdar
wrote:
Hi,
I have recently started work on building a VM for Lua (actually
a derivative of Lua) in X86-64 assembly. I am using the dynasm
tool that is part of LuaJIT. I was wondering whether I could
also write this in D's inline
Hi,
I have recently started work on building a VM for Lua (actually a
derivative of Lua) in X86-64 assembly. I am using the dynasm tool
that is part of LuaJIT. I was wondering whether I could also
write this in D's inline assembly perhaps, but there is one
aspect that I am not sure how to
30 matches
Mail list logo
