On Monday, 4 December 2017 at 01:54:57 UTC, ketmar wrote:
Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 22:22:47 UTC, Arun
Chandrasekaran wrote:
Git CLI is arcane and esoteric. I've lost my commits before
(yeah, my mistake).
Who hasn't ;)
me.
Happened to me last time because i tried a
Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 22:22:47 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran wrote:
Git CLI is arcane and esoteric. I've lost my commits before (yeah, my
mistake).
Who hasn't ;)
me.
Happened to me last time because i tried a command supposed to remove
untracked files in
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 23:39:49 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 22:22:47 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran
wrote:
Git CLI is arcane and esoteric. I've lost my commits before
(yeah, my mistake).
Who hasn't ;)
Happened to me last time because i tried a command supposed to
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 22:22:47 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran
wrote:
Git CLI is arcane and esoteric. I've lost my commits before
(yeah, my mistake).
Who hasn't ;)
Happened to me last time because i tried a command supposed to
remove untracked files in submodules...but used "reset" in a
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 22:33:40 UTC, kdevel wrote:
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 14:58:03 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
In this case i'd go for a typed pointer, e.g
---
immutable struct Configuration
{
this(string){/*load some file...*/}
int value;
}
Configuration* config;
void main()
On Sun, 03 Dec 2017 16:42:46 +, vino wrote:
> Question:
> Is there a way to map network drive in windows using D code, similar to
> the windows command such as "net use" or "pushd" or powershell command
> New-PSDrive.?
>
> From,
> Vino.B
There's WNetAddConnection2[1] and
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 14:58:03 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
In this case i'd go for a typed pointer, e.g
---
immutable struct Configuration
{
this(string){/*load some file...*/}
int value;
}
Configuration* config;
void main()
{
try config = new Configuration("config.sdl");
Git CLI is arcane and esoteric. I've lost my commits before
(yeah, my mistake). Since then I always access git via mercurial.
In comparison Mercurial is far better a VCS tool.
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 20:05:47 UTC, bitwise wrote:
I've finally started learning git, due to our team expanding
beyond one person - awesome, right? Anyways, I've got things
more or less figured out, which is nice, because being clueless
about git is a big blocker for me trying to do
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 20:05:47 UTC, bitwise wrote:
I've finally started learning git, due to our team expanding
beyond one person - awesome, right? Anyways, I've got things
more or less figured out, which is nice, because being clueless
about git is a big blocker for me trying to do
I've finally started learning git, due to our team expanding
beyond one person - awesome, right? Anyways, I've got things more
or less figured out, which is nice, because being clueless about
git is a big blocker for me trying to do any real work on
dmd/phobos/druntime. As far as working on a
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 15:24:27 UTC, Manuel Maier wrote:
I've been experimenting with the -betterC switch and stumbled
upon something that didn't quite make sense to me.
betterC doesn't change the language, it just doesn't compile in
all the features automatically. So rules about
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 01:27:40 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Saturday, 2 December 2017 at 14:23:48 UTC, Vino wrote:
Hi,
Even tried the Option "Run with Highest Privilege" but no
luck. and also tried with option "Configure for : Windows
Vista , Windows Server 2008"
From,
Vino.B
You
Why is template param T != B but T == Rebindable!(const(B)) when
specialization is T : const(A)?
abstract class A{}
class B : A{}
string foo(T : const(A))(T x){
return T.stringof;
}
void main(){
import std.typecons : Rebindable;
import std.stdio : writeln;
Rebindable!(const
On 2017-12-03 10:57, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
On 12/03/2017 03:46 AM, bauss wrote:
It wouldn't make much sense either, if a struct was able to do it.
Why is that?
It would get an extra field, making the size of the struct larger and
not compatible with a C struct. But I guess
I've been experimenting with the -betterC switch and stumbled
upon something that didn't quite make sense to me.
I've put together a small example [1] of Win32 code with a window
callback that has to be nothrow as per the definition of WNDPROC
somewhere in core.sys.windows. However, calling
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 05:49:54 UTC, Fra Mecca wrote:
I have this code:
Configuration conf = void ;
try {
conf = parse_config("config.sdl");
} catch (Exception e) {
std.stdio.stderr.writeln("Error reading configuration
file: ", e.msg);
exit(1);
}
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 14:16:42 UTC, kdevel wrote:
int main ()
{
try {
real_main ();
}
catch (Exception e) {
std.stdio.stderr.writeln(e.msg);
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
```
This is better:
int main ()
{
try {
return real_main ();
}
catch
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 05:49:54 UTC, Fra Mecca wrote:
I have this code:
Configuration conf = void ;
try {
conf = parse_config("config.sdl");
} catch (Exception e) {
std.stdio.stderr.writeln("Error reading configuration
file: ", e.msg);
exit(1);
}
On 12/03/2017 03:46 AM, bauss wrote:
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 07:38:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
As I understand it, there is no outer for nested structs, only nested
classes. So, you'll either have to use a nested class or explicitly
pass a reference to the outer class to the nested
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 at 07:38:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, December 03, 2017 01:05:00 Nick Sabalausky via
Digitalmars-d- learn wrote:
Is this even possible? My attempts:
class Outer {
struct Inner {
void foo() {
// Error: no property 'outer' for type
21 matches
Mail list logo
