On Friday, 20 July 2018 at 16:53:12 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
Hmm, on that part about the attributes copying their values, I
suppose it would be sufficient if I could apply the attributes
to a group of declarations. However, it didn't seem to work
properly for me with UDAs, and I noticed that even
On Friday, 20 July 2018 at 14:11:23 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Friday, 20 July 2018 at 07:25:23 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
UDAs apply to symbols. When you pass something to a function,
the symbol does not go with the value, and thus that UDA goes
away. It's similar to assigning to a different
On Friday, 20 July 2018 at 15:33:19 UTC, Radu wrote:
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 18:16:17 UTC, kinke wrote:
I'll go with Seb's suggestion and look at the betterC tests
upstream for issues like this.
FYI: I made a reboot of the old PR to a new one which just adds
the betterC testsuite:
On Friday, 20 July 2018 at 15:20:43 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
Can confirm that dpp works to create mex files. Rewriting the
mypow2.c example in D:
[snip]
This sounds really great. I assume if it works with Octave it is
very likely to work with Matlab's mex.h without issues (I might
get
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 18:16:17 UTC, kinke wrote:
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 12:44:30 UTC, Radu wrote:
[...]
Removing some superfluous explicit druntime dependencies from
Phobos would be a start. Your (nice) example compiles fine with
this 4-lines Phobos hack:
[...]
Was able to
On Wednesday, 20 June 2018 at 18:47:10 UTC, Jordi Gutiérrez
Hermoso wrote:
Another possibility might be in dlopen'able functions.
Currently Octave uses so-called oct functions, which are
nothing more than C++ object code that is dynamically loaded by
the interpreter at runtime. They are
On Friday, 20 July 2018 at 07:25:23 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
UDAs apply to symbols. When you pass something to a function,
the symbol does not go with the value, and thus that UDA goes
away. It's similar to assigning to a different variable:
import std.traits : hasUDA;
@("foo")
On Friday, 20 July 2018 at 10:31:44 UTC, Laurent Tréguier wrote:
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 15:42:02 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
Found the problem. The libclang package is looking for
/usr/lib/llvm-3.9/lib/libclang.so. For some reason, Ubuntu has
libclang.so.1. Creating a symlink in that directory
On 7/19/18 4:50 AM, RazvanN wrote:
struct A
{
int a;
@disable ~this() {}
}
void main()
{
A a = A(2);
}
Currently, this code yields:
Error: destructor `A.~this` cannot be used because it is annotated with
@disable
I was expecting that disabling the destructor would make it as
On Friday, 20 July 2018 at 04:31:38 UTC, Jordan Wilson wrote:
On Friday, 20 July 2018 at 01:34:39 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 21:43:35 UTC, Jordan Wilson wrote:
Is there any way I can generate the appropriate lib?
Else I think I'll need to get hold of the proper
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 10:04:34 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 09:50:32 UTC, Jim Balter wrote:
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 08:50:15 UTC, RazvanN wrote:
struct A
{
int a;
@disable ~this() {}
}
void main()
{
A a = A(2);
}
Currently, this code yields:
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 15:42:02 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
Found the problem. The libclang package is looking for
/usr/lib/llvm-3.9/lib/libclang.so. For some reason, Ubuntu has
libclang.so.1. Creating a symlink in that directory to
libclang.so is a solution.
Do you have the development
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 19:18:43 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
However, it seems like hasUDA doesn't seem to produce the
result I would have expected here. I tried using getAttributes,
but that didn't work either.
Am I missing something, or should I submit an enhancement
request?
UDAs apply to
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 19:18:43 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I wanted to create a struct with a member function whose
behavior was different depending on whether the struct instance
had a particular UDA.
However, it seems like hasUDA doesn't seem to produce the
result I would have expected here.
14 matches
Mail list logo
