On Monday, 13 December 2021 at 09:36:57 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
```d
@safe:
string prematureoptimizations(string s, char stripchar)
@trusted {
import core.memory;
immutable uint flags =
GC.BlkAttr.NO_SCAN|GC.BlkAttr.APPENDABLE;
char* begin =
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 20:14:01 UTC, Dr Machine Code
wrote:
it differ from assert because it contains the expression, file
and line information. See this
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14420857/check-expect-example-in-racket
what's the closest thing we have in D? can we make it
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 20:14:01 UTC, Dr Machine Code
wrote:
it differ from assert because it contains the expression, file
and line information. See this
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14420857/check-expect-example-in-racket
what's the closest thing we have in D? can we make it
it differ from assert because it contains the expression, file
and line information. See this
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14420857/check-expect-example-in-racket
what's the closest thing we have in D? can we make it without
compiler builtin?
On 2021-12-22 16:28, Paul Backus wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 15:20:15 UTC, Christian Köstlin wrote:
https://github.com/rui314/mold
Kind regards,
Christian
This was recently discussed in the "General" forum:
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/fiyfgqykhdmglqypx...@forum.dlang.org
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 16:10:42 UTC, Adam D Ruppe
wrote:
So OUTSIDE a function, static foreach() {{ }} is illegal
because a plain {} is illegal outside a function.
But INSIDE a function, static foreach() {{ }} is legal, but it
isn't magic about static foreach - it is just a body
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 16:01:49 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Seems to be working just fine as of 2.098.
```d
import std;
void main()
{
static foreach(Foo; ["Abc", "def"]) {{
string str = Foo;
writeln("Hello D ", str, __VERSION__);
}}
}
```
```
Hello D Abc2098
On 22.12.21 17:01, rikki cattermole wrote:
Anyway, AliasAssign has nothing to do with this. This "trick" creates a
closure aka ``() { ... }``. Thats all its doing.
From the AST dump:
```
import object;
import std;
void main()
{
{
string str = "Abc";
writeln("Hello D ",
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 15:57:29 UTC, data pulverizer
wrote:
I noticed that the double bracket `{{` for scoping `static
foreach` is no longer part of D and it looks like it has been
replaced with
https://dlang.org/changelog/2.098.0.html#AliasAssign
None of these things have
Seems to be working just fine as of 2.098.
```d
import std;
void main()
{
static foreach(Foo; ["Abc", "def"]) {{
string str = Foo;
writeln("Hello D ", str, __VERSION__);
}}
}
```
```
Hello D Abc2098
Hello D def2098
```
Anyway, AliasAssign has nothing to do with this.
Hi All,
I noticed that the double bracket `{{` for scoping `static
foreach` is no longer part of D and it looks like it has been
replaced with
https://dlang.org/changelog/2.098.0.html#AliasAssign. Could
someone confirm this with a link to the DIP and any other tools
that we should be using
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 15:20:15 UTC, Christian Köstlin
wrote:
https://github.com/rui314/mold
Kind regards,
Christian
This was recently discussed in the "General" forum:
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/fiyfgqykhdmglqypx...@forum.dlang.org
https://github.com/rui314/mold
Kind regards,
Christian
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 11:50:06 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 10:37:51 UTC, Michel wrote:
Hey, I've tried coding in Visual Studio Code but there isn't
any function checking/showing what arguments a function
accepts, I can just write
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 10:37:51 UTC, Michel wrote:
Hey, I've tried coding in Visual Studio Code but there isn't
any function checking/showing what arguments a function
accepts, I can just write `Foo.Bar("somerandomarg");` and it
will not give me errors or warnings.
Which IDE do
sorry for intervening... :)
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 08:17:03 UTC, rempas wrote:
No garbage collector, no exceptions
GOLDEN WORDS!!!
Yeah, Seriously D's developers and user really underestimate
the fact that the biggest percent of people not using D are
doing so because of the
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 10:05:25 UTC, rempas wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 09:49:59 UTC, eugene wrote:
It looks strange - leading D compiler is not in Linux/FreeBSD
repos :)
Well no so much.
Well, ok. Now the only thing I can "do" is to wait until
[the
Hey, I've tried coding in Visual Studio Code but there isn't any
function checking/showing what arguments a function accepts, I
can just write `Foo.Bar("somerandomarg");` and it will not give
me errors or warnings.
Which IDE do you guys use to get proper intellisense?
Thanks
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 09:49:59 UTC, eugene wrote:
It looks strange - leading D compiler is not in Linux/FreeBSD
repos :)
Well no so much. The only official compiler is DMD and when it
comes to that, Digital Mars, has pre-built binaries for most
Linux distros and for FreeBSD.
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 00:43:16 UTC, Johan wrote:
When you run `ldc2 -v test.d` (some arbitrary d file), you
should see "predefs" at the top, followed by a bunch of
predefined versions by the compiler. FreeBSD_xx should be on
that list, and the number should correspond to your OS
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 08:41:56 UTC, eugene wrote:
Both these files are just copies from DMD distribution.
Forget to mention...
[installation instructions](https://dlang.org/dmd-freebsd.html)
are complete mess
I just copied right things to right places manually.
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 08:41:56 UTC, eugene wrote:
You thought right - I **DID NOT** try the latest LDC, I just
looked into
ldc2-1.28.0-freebsd-x86_64.tar.xz archive to see
what is in core/sys/freebsd/config.d and in
core/sys/freebsd/sys/event.d
Both these files are just copies
On Wednesday, 22 December 2021 at 06:50:00 UTC, rempas wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 21:09:14 UTC, eugene wrote:
* The ldc installed by 'pkg install ldc' (the old one), does
not have config module
* Most resent ldc (link you indicated), does have condig
module, and it is exactly the
On Tuesday, 21 December 2021 at 22:50:57 UTC, russhy wrote:
I took a look and to be honest, it's the same story as
everything in the STD, they try to do everything at the same
time, so they up end calling each other, you end up lost in
multiple 8k LOC modules, not understanding what the
24 matches
Mail list logo
